Robert Hopefl, Jing Wang, Abhinav Ram Mohan, Wei-Jhe Sun, Myong-Jin Kim, Meng Hu, Lanyan Fang
{"title":"基于随机生存森林的孤儿药仿制药首次申报预测分析","authors":"Robert Hopefl, Jing Wang, Abhinav Ram Mohan, Wei-Jhe Sun, Myong-Jin Kim, Meng Hu, Lanyan Fang","doi":"10.1111/cts.70365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rare diseases affect a small population of patients, resulting in low incentives for developing orphan drug products (ODPs). The United States Congress passed the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 to incentivize pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop drugs to treat rare diseases. However, ODPs generally have higher treatment costs than non-ODP treatments. Developing generic ODPs can benefit patients by increasing market competition and providing alternate treatment options. This research aims to identify factors influencing the first submission of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for generic orphan drugs. Data were collected from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases (including but not limited to the FDA Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals database, Orange Book, and the internal drug product complexity designation) and the IQVIA sales database to inform the drug product information, regulatory factors, and pharmacoeconomic factors. The Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning method was employed to conduct the analysis for New Chemical Entities (NCEs) and non-NCEs. The modeling analysis was adequately assessed through both internal and external validations. For NCEs and non-NCEs, the RSF was able to predict ANDA submission with a repeated cross-validation C-index of 0.675 ± 0.0261 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.915) and 0.754 ± 0.0441 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.838), respectively. The variables with the highest importance in the RSF model to predict ANDA submission of NCE ODPs were sales data, while for non-NCEs, regulatory data was the most important (i.e., availability of product-specific guidances (PSGs)). As more data becomes available in the future, the RSF methodology will likely be able to predict ANDA submissions of ODPs more effectively. The model-informed results may be utilized in future intervention strategies to promote ANDA submissions for orphan drugs and to increase the availability of generic ODPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Analysis for First Submission of Generic Drug Application for Orphan Drug Products Using Random Survival Forest\",\"authors\":\"Robert Hopefl, Jing Wang, Abhinav Ram Mohan, Wei-Jhe Sun, Myong-Jin Kim, Meng Hu, Lanyan Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rare diseases affect a small population of patients, resulting in low incentives for developing orphan drug products (ODPs). The United States Congress passed the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 to incentivize pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop drugs to treat rare diseases. However, ODPs generally have higher treatment costs than non-ODP treatments. Developing generic ODPs can benefit patients by increasing market competition and providing alternate treatment options. This research aims to identify factors influencing the first submission of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for generic orphan drugs. Data were collected from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases (including but not limited to the FDA Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals database, Orange Book, and the internal drug product complexity designation) and the IQVIA sales database to inform the drug product information, regulatory factors, and pharmacoeconomic factors. The Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning method was employed to conduct the analysis for New Chemical Entities (NCEs) and non-NCEs. The modeling analysis was adequately assessed through both internal and external validations. For NCEs and non-NCEs, the RSF was able to predict ANDA submission with a repeated cross-validation C-index of 0.675 ± 0.0261 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.915) and 0.754 ± 0.0441 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.838), respectively. The variables with the highest importance in the RSF model to predict ANDA submission of NCE ODPs were sales data, while for non-NCEs, regulatory data was the most important (i.e., availability of product-specific guidances (PSGs)). As more data becomes available in the future, the RSF methodology will likely be able to predict ANDA submissions of ODPs more effectively. The model-informed results may be utilized in future intervention strategies to promote ANDA submissions for orphan drugs and to increase the availability of generic ODPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497357/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70365\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictive Analysis for First Submission of Generic Drug Application for Orphan Drug Products Using Random Survival Forest
Rare diseases affect a small population of patients, resulting in low incentives for developing orphan drug products (ODPs). The United States Congress passed the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 to incentivize pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop drugs to treat rare diseases. However, ODPs generally have higher treatment costs than non-ODP treatments. Developing generic ODPs can benefit patients by increasing market competition and providing alternate treatment options. This research aims to identify factors influencing the first submission of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for generic orphan drugs. Data were collected from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases (including but not limited to the FDA Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals database, Orange Book, and the internal drug product complexity designation) and the IQVIA sales database to inform the drug product information, regulatory factors, and pharmacoeconomic factors. The Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning method was employed to conduct the analysis for New Chemical Entities (NCEs) and non-NCEs. The modeling analysis was adequately assessed through both internal and external validations. For NCEs and non-NCEs, the RSF was able to predict ANDA submission with a repeated cross-validation C-index of 0.675 ± 0.0261 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.915) and 0.754 ± 0.0441 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.838), respectively. The variables with the highest importance in the RSF model to predict ANDA submission of NCE ODPs were sales data, while for non-NCEs, regulatory data was the most important (i.e., availability of product-specific guidances (PSGs)). As more data becomes available in the future, the RSF methodology will likely be able to predict ANDA submissions of ODPs more effectively. The model-informed results may be utilized in future intervention strategies to promote ANDA submissions for orphan drugs and to increase the availability of generic ODPs.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.