重症监护综合征后的感知:通过看护者的棱镜看。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anne-Françoise Rousseau, Pauline Minguet, Camille Colson, Sarah Neis-Gilson, Bernard Lambermont, Aurélie Wagener
{"title":"重症监护综合征后的感知:通过看护者的棱镜看。","authors":"Anne-Françoise Rousseau, Pauline Minguet, Camille Colson, Sarah Neis-Gilson, Bernard Lambermont, Aurélie Wagener","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2569098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The critical illness, the stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) impact the patients and their caregivers. The aim of this observational study was to compare their respective perceptions of major post-ICU troubles. Patients who survived a prolonged ICU stay were routinely invited to a standardized post-ICU follow-up program including several visits scheduled during the year after ICU discharge. Patients were invited to a face-to-face interview, accompanied by a caregiver if needed. Using the same 10-item questionnaire, patients reported their perception of their current health status while caregivers reported how they perceived the patient's current health status. A total score ranging from 0 to 100 expressed the perceived global health status. Caregivers' anxiety was assessed using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). From October 2022 to December 2024, a total of 105 follow-up consultations were conducted 105 days (IQR 85-211) after ICU discharge, during which patients were accompanied by a caregiver, and both completed the questionnaires. They represented 97 different pairs. The caregivers were mostly partners (70/97, 72.2%), living in the same home (81/97, 83.5%). The total score differed between patients and relatives (<i>p</i> = 0.003), respectively reaching 24 (12-40) and 25 (14-50). On average, the score was 5.3 ± 16.4 points lower when reported by caregivers. Items of the questionnaire were scored similarly in 23.8-45.8% of the cases. The scores obtained at the end of the consultation (59/105) were similar (<i>p</i> = 0.062), unlike those obtained at the beginning (46/105) (<i>p</i> = 0.029). The caregivers' HADS-A did not correlate with the total scores differences but correlated with the patients total score (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.004). This study highlights that the perception of post-ICU troubles differed between ICU survivors and their caregivers. The impact of this different perception on PICS or PICS-family severity or management should be further studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-intensive care syndrome perception: a look through the caregivers' prism.\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Françoise Rousseau, Pauline Minguet, Camille Colson, Sarah Neis-Gilson, Bernard Lambermont, Aurélie Wagener\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2025.2569098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The critical illness, the stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) impact the patients and their caregivers. The aim of this observational study was to compare their respective perceptions of major post-ICU troubles. Patients who survived a prolonged ICU stay were routinely invited to a standardized post-ICU follow-up program including several visits scheduled during the year after ICU discharge. Patients were invited to a face-to-face interview, accompanied by a caregiver if needed. Using the same 10-item questionnaire, patients reported their perception of their current health status while caregivers reported how they perceived the patient's current health status. A total score ranging from 0 to 100 expressed the perceived global health status. Caregivers' anxiety was assessed using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). From October 2022 to December 2024, a total of 105 follow-up consultations were conducted 105 days (IQR 85-211) after ICU discharge, during which patients were accompanied by a caregiver, and both completed the questionnaires. They represented 97 different pairs. The caregivers were mostly partners (70/97, 72.2%), living in the same home (81/97, 83.5%). The total score differed between patients and relatives (<i>p</i> = 0.003), respectively reaching 24 (12-40) and 25 (14-50). On average, the score was 5.3 ± 16.4 points lower when reported by caregivers. Items of the questionnaire were scored similarly in 23.8-45.8% of the cases. The scores obtained at the end of the consultation (59/105) were similar (<i>p</i> = 0.062), unlike those obtained at the beginning (46/105) (<i>p</i> = 0.029). The caregivers' HADS-A did not correlate with the total scores differences but correlated with the patients total score (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.004). This study highlights that the perception of post-ICU troubles differed between ICU survivors and their caregivers. The impact of this different perception on PICS or PICS-family severity or management should be further studied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2569098\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2569098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

危重症、重症监护病房(ICU)和重症监护后综合征(PICS)对患者及其护理人员的影响。本观察性研究的目的是比较他们各自对icu后主要问题的看法。在ICU长时间住院后存活下来的患者通常被邀请参加标准化的ICU后随访计划,包括在ICU出院后一年内安排的几次访问。患者被邀请进行面对面的访谈,如果需要的话,还会有护理人员陪同。使用同样的10项调查问卷,患者报告他们对目前健康状况的看法,而护理人员报告他们如何看待患者目前的健康状况。总分从0到100表示感知到的全球健康状况。使用医院焦虑与抑郁量表(HADS-A)的焦虑子量表评估护理人员的焦虑。从2022年10月至2024年12月,在ICU出院后105天(IQR 85-211)共进行了105次随访咨询,患者在护理人员陪同下完成问卷调查。他们代表了97对不同的组合。照顾者多为伴侣(70/97,72.2%)、同住者(81/97,83.5%)。患者与亲属的总分差异有统计学意义(p = 0.003),分别为24分(12-40分)和25分(14-50分)。照护者报告的平均得分低5.3±16.4分。23.8% ~ 45.8%的病例的问卷项目得分相似。咨询结束时的得分(59/105)相似(p = 0.062),与开始时的得分(46/105)不同(p = 0.029)。护理人员的HADS-A与总分差异无相关性,但与患者总分差异有相关性(rs = 0.29, p = 0.004)。本研究强调,ICU幸存者和他们的照顾者对ICU后麻烦的看法不同。这种不同的看法对PICS或PICS家庭严重程度或管理的影响应进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-intensive care syndrome perception: a look through the caregivers' prism.

The critical illness, the stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) impact the patients and their caregivers. The aim of this observational study was to compare their respective perceptions of major post-ICU troubles. Patients who survived a prolonged ICU stay were routinely invited to a standardized post-ICU follow-up program including several visits scheduled during the year after ICU discharge. Patients were invited to a face-to-face interview, accompanied by a caregiver if needed. Using the same 10-item questionnaire, patients reported their perception of their current health status while caregivers reported how they perceived the patient's current health status. A total score ranging from 0 to 100 expressed the perceived global health status. Caregivers' anxiety was assessed using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). From October 2022 to December 2024, a total of 105 follow-up consultations were conducted 105 days (IQR 85-211) after ICU discharge, during which patients were accompanied by a caregiver, and both completed the questionnaires. They represented 97 different pairs. The caregivers were mostly partners (70/97, 72.2%), living in the same home (81/97, 83.5%). The total score differed between patients and relatives (p = 0.003), respectively reaching 24 (12-40) and 25 (14-50). On average, the score was 5.3 ± 16.4 points lower when reported by caregivers. Items of the questionnaire were scored similarly in 23.8-45.8% of the cases. The scores obtained at the end of the consultation (59/105) were similar (p = 0.062), unlike those obtained at the beginning (46/105) (p = 0.029). The caregivers' HADS-A did not correlate with the total scores differences but correlated with the patients total score (rs = 0.29, p = 0.004). This study highlights that the perception of post-ICU troubles differed between ICU survivors and their caregivers. The impact of this different perception on PICS or PICS-family severity or management should be further studied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信