考察1915年以来各州自主服务的差异(c)老年人豁免。

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Natalie R Turner, Carli Friedman
{"title":"考察1915年以来各州自主服务的差异(c)老年人豁免。","authors":"Natalie R Turner, Carli Friedman","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2568441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-Direction is a service delivery model rooted in choice, empowerment, and control over long-term services and supports that allows older adults to select their services and who provides them. States determine key Self-Direction characteristics including level of state commitment, services that can be self-directed, and employer and budget authority, which may affect access and use. This mixed-method study identifies cross-state differences in how states are allowing Self-Direction among the 60 fiscal year 2023 Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) 1915(c) waivers that serve older adults using Framework Analysis and descriptive statistics. Framework Analysis resulted in three qualitative categories for analysis: description of program values, determination of capacity, explanation of authority granted to self-directing participants. Descriptive findings showed significant cross-state differences in Self-Direction design, with high variation in goals set for Self-Direction participation, projected spending on Self-Direction eligible services, and number of waiver services eligible for Self-Direction. Findings indicate significant variation in design of Self-Direction across 1915(c) waivers. Older adults' access to and experience with Self-Direction may be significantly influenced by their state of residence. States can use these findings to learn from other waivers and enhance their own design.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Cross-State Differences in Self Directed Services Provided Through 1915(c) Waivers for Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie R Turner, Carli Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959420.2025.2568441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-Direction is a service delivery model rooted in choice, empowerment, and control over long-term services and supports that allows older adults to select their services and who provides them. States determine key Self-Direction characteristics including level of state commitment, services that can be self-directed, and employer and budget authority, which may affect access and use. This mixed-method study identifies cross-state differences in how states are allowing Self-Direction among the 60 fiscal year 2023 Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) 1915(c) waivers that serve older adults using Framework Analysis and descriptive statistics. Framework Analysis resulted in three qualitative categories for analysis: description of program values, determination of capacity, explanation of authority granted to self-directing participants. Descriptive findings showed significant cross-state differences in Self-Direction design, with high variation in goals set for Self-Direction participation, projected spending on Self-Direction eligible services, and number of waiver services eligible for Self-Direction. Findings indicate significant variation in design of Self-Direction across 1915(c) waivers. Older adults' access to and experience with Self-Direction may be significantly influenced by their state of residence. States can use these findings to learn from other waivers and enhance their own design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2568441\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2568441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我指导是一种基于选择、授权和控制长期服务和支持的服务提供模式,允许老年人选择自己的服务和由谁提供服务。国家决定关键的自我指导特征,包括国家承诺的级别、可以自我指导的服务以及可能影响访问和使用的雇主和预算权限。这项混合方法研究确定了各州在2023财政年度医疗补助家庭和社区服务(HCBS) 1915(c)豁免中允许自我指导的跨州差异,这些豁免使用框架分析和描述性统计数据为老年人提供服务。框架分析产生了三个定性的分析类别:项目价值的描述,能力的确定,对授予自我指导参与者的权威的解释。描述性研究结果显示,在自我指导设计上存在显著的跨州差异,在自我指导参与的目标设定、在自我指导合格服务上的预计支出以及符合自我指导的豁免服务的数量上存在很大差异。研究结果表明,在1915年(c)豁免中,自我指导的设计存在显著差异。老年人对自我指导的获取和体验可能受到其居住状态的显著影响。各州可以利用这些发现从其他豁免中学习,并加强自己的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Cross-State Differences in Self Directed Services Provided Through 1915(c) Waivers for Older Adults.

Self-Direction is a service delivery model rooted in choice, empowerment, and control over long-term services and supports that allows older adults to select their services and who provides them. States determine key Self-Direction characteristics including level of state commitment, services that can be self-directed, and employer and budget authority, which may affect access and use. This mixed-method study identifies cross-state differences in how states are allowing Self-Direction among the 60 fiscal year 2023 Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) 1915(c) waivers that serve older adults using Framework Analysis and descriptive statistics. Framework Analysis resulted in three qualitative categories for analysis: description of program values, determination of capacity, explanation of authority granted to self-directing participants. Descriptive findings showed significant cross-state differences in Self-Direction design, with high variation in goals set for Self-Direction participation, projected spending on Self-Direction eligible services, and number of waiver services eligible for Self-Direction. Findings indicate significant variation in design of Self-Direction across 1915(c) waivers. Older adults' access to and experience with Self-Direction may be significantly influenced by their state of residence. States can use these findings to learn from other waivers and enhance their own design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信