{"title":"[生物标志物在阿尔茨海默病诊断中的现状和未来展望]。","authors":"Takanobu Ishiguro, Kensaku Kasuga","doi":"10.11477/mf.030126030530050923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, characterized by the pathological accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau in the brain. Recent advances in biomarker technology have significantly improved AD diagnosis and treatment. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography imaging are now available in clinical settings and serve as key tools in identifying early-stage AD, especially when considering anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapies. In 2024, the Alzheimer's Association proposed revised diagnostic criteria that integrate both biomarker-based and clinical staging systems. This framework introduces a classification of \"core biomarkers\" that reflect AD-specific pathology and defines biological and clinical symptom stages. Furthermore, blood-based biomarkers, such as plasma p-tau217 and MTBR-tau243, are gaining attention as minimally invasive tools for early diagnosis and disease staging. As these biomarkers become more accessible, proper interpretation within a clinical context remains essential. In Japan, biomarker testing is currently recommended only for symptomatic individuals, and its use requires careful judgment regarding indications and relevance to the clinical setting. This review outlines the evolution of diagnostic criteria, current and emerging biomarkers, and their implications for personalized AD care while emphasizing the need for expert clinical interpretation to ensure responsible and patient-centric use.</p>","PeriodicalId":35984,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Surgery","volume":"53 5","pages":"923-931"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Current Status and Future Perspectives of Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis].\",\"authors\":\"Takanobu Ishiguro, Kensaku Kasuga\",\"doi\":\"10.11477/mf.030126030530050923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, characterized by the pathological accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau in the brain. Recent advances in biomarker technology have significantly improved AD diagnosis and treatment. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography imaging are now available in clinical settings and serve as key tools in identifying early-stage AD, especially when considering anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapies. In 2024, the Alzheimer's Association proposed revised diagnostic criteria that integrate both biomarker-based and clinical staging systems. This framework introduces a classification of \\\"core biomarkers\\\" that reflect AD-specific pathology and defines biological and clinical symptom stages. Furthermore, blood-based biomarkers, such as plasma p-tau217 and MTBR-tau243, are gaining attention as minimally invasive tools for early diagnosis and disease staging. As these biomarkers become more accessible, proper interpretation within a clinical context remains essential. In Japan, biomarker testing is currently recommended only for symptomatic individuals, and its use requires careful judgment regarding indications and relevance to the clinical setting. This review outlines the evolution of diagnostic criteria, current and emerging biomarkers, and their implications for personalized AD care while emphasizing the need for expert clinical interpretation to ensure responsible and patient-centric use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Surgery\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"923-931\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.030126030530050923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.030126030530050923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Current Status and Future Perspectives of Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis].
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, characterized by the pathological accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau in the brain. Recent advances in biomarker technology have significantly improved AD diagnosis and treatment. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography imaging are now available in clinical settings and serve as key tools in identifying early-stage AD, especially when considering anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapies. In 2024, the Alzheimer's Association proposed revised diagnostic criteria that integrate both biomarker-based and clinical staging systems. This framework introduces a classification of "core biomarkers" that reflect AD-specific pathology and defines biological and clinical symptom stages. Furthermore, blood-based biomarkers, such as plasma p-tau217 and MTBR-tau243, are gaining attention as minimally invasive tools for early diagnosis and disease staging. As these biomarkers become more accessible, proper interpretation within a clinical context remains essential. In Japan, biomarker testing is currently recommended only for symptomatic individuals, and its use requires careful judgment regarding indications and relevance to the clinical setting. This review outlines the evolution of diagnostic criteria, current and emerging biomarkers, and their implications for personalized AD care while emphasizing the need for expert clinical interpretation to ensure responsible and patient-centric use.