老年人参与政策制定的范围评估。

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Chunyan Kong, Arlind Reuter, Tine Buffel, Wenqian Xu
{"title":"老年人参与政策制定的范围评估。","authors":"Chunyan Kong, Arlind Reuter, Tine Buffel, Wenqian Xu","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2568433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The importance of older adults' participation in policymaking is increasingly recognized, but the nuanced participation processes remain insufficiently understood. This scoping review aims to map existing research on older adults' participation in policymaking, focusing on who participates, their activities and contributions, resulting outputs and outcomes, and the enablers and barriers affecting their participation. A systematic search was conducted to identify peer-reviewed literature through Web of Science, SocINDEX, Academic Search Complete, Humanities International Complete, and Scopus, and gray literature through Google Scholar, institutional repositories, and expert recommendations. The eligibility criteria are original empirical studies focusing on individuals aged 50 years and older and their participation in policymaking. In total, 23 studies were included in the final review. A structured extraction form was developed to capture study characteristics, participant socio-demographics, participation activities, policy outputs and outcomes, and factors affecting participation. Descriptive analysis was performed on study characteristics, and content analysis was conducted on participation processes. Most studies (78%) were conducted in high-income countries, often overrepresenting women, younger cohorts, more educated and community-dwelling older adults. This participation was often ad hoc rather than institutionally established and supported. Older adults contributed to developing policy documents, shaping long-term outcomes, and enhancing personal well-being. The review identified participation enablers at individual and institutional levels and highlighted barriers such as time and resource constraints, health limitations, power imbalances, and ageism. The findings inform policy and program interventions to establish mechanisms for older adults' participation, address barriers for disadvantaged groups, and create meaningful pathways for translating their contributions into policy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review on Older Adults' Participation in Policymaking.\",\"authors\":\"Chunyan Kong, Arlind Reuter, Tine Buffel, Wenqian Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959420.2025.2568433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The importance of older adults' participation in policymaking is increasingly recognized, but the nuanced participation processes remain insufficiently understood. This scoping review aims to map existing research on older adults' participation in policymaking, focusing on who participates, their activities and contributions, resulting outputs and outcomes, and the enablers and barriers affecting their participation. A systematic search was conducted to identify peer-reviewed literature through Web of Science, SocINDEX, Academic Search Complete, Humanities International Complete, and Scopus, and gray literature through Google Scholar, institutional repositories, and expert recommendations. The eligibility criteria are original empirical studies focusing on individuals aged 50 years and older and their participation in policymaking. In total, 23 studies were included in the final review. A structured extraction form was developed to capture study characteristics, participant socio-demographics, participation activities, policy outputs and outcomes, and factors affecting participation. Descriptive analysis was performed on study characteristics, and content analysis was conducted on participation processes. Most studies (78%) were conducted in high-income countries, often overrepresenting women, younger cohorts, more educated and community-dwelling older adults. This participation was often ad hoc rather than institutionally established and supported. Older adults contributed to developing policy documents, shaping long-term outcomes, and enhancing personal well-being. The review identified participation enablers at individual and institutional levels and highlighted barriers such as time and resource constraints, health limitations, power imbalances, and ageism. The findings inform policy and program interventions to establish mechanisms for older adults' participation, address barriers for disadvantaged groups, and create meaningful pathways for translating their contributions into policy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2568433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2568433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人参与政策制定的重要性日益得到承认,但其参与过程的细微差别仍未得到充分了解。这一范围审查的目的是绘制关于老年人参与决策的现有研究的地图,重点是参与者、他们的活动和贡献、产生的产出和结果,以及影响他们参与的推动因素和障碍。通过Web of Science、SocINDEX、Academic search Complete、Humanities International Complete和Scopus对同行评议文献进行了系统检索,并通过谷歌Scholar、机构知识库和专家推荐对灰色文献进行了系统检索。资格标准是针对50岁及以上的个人及其参与政策制定的原始实证研究。总共有23项研究被纳入最终审查。开发了一种结构化的提取表格,以捕获研究特征、参与者社会人口统计学、参与活动、政策产出和结果以及影响参与的因素。对研究特征进行描述性分析,对参与过程进行内容分析。大多数研究(78%)是在高收入国家进行的,往往是女性、年轻人群、受教育程度更高和居住在社区的老年人。这种参与往往是临时的,而不是体制上建立和支持的。老年人为制定政策文件、形成长期成果和提高个人福祉做出了贡献。审查确定了个人和机构层面的参与促进因素,并强调了时间和资源限制、健康限制、权力不平衡和年龄歧视等障碍。研究结果为政策和项目干预提供了信息,以建立老年人参与机制,解决弱势群体的障碍,并为将老年人的贡献转化为政策成果创造有意义的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Scoping Review on Older Adults' Participation in Policymaking.

The importance of older adults' participation in policymaking is increasingly recognized, but the nuanced participation processes remain insufficiently understood. This scoping review aims to map existing research on older adults' participation in policymaking, focusing on who participates, their activities and contributions, resulting outputs and outcomes, and the enablers and barriers affecting their participation. A systematic search was conducted to identify peer-reviewed literature through Web of Science, SocINDEX, Academic Search Complete, Humanities International Complete, and Scopus, and gray literature through Google Scholar, institutional repositories, and expert recommendations. The eligibility criteria are original empirical studies focusing on individuals aged 50 years and older and their participation in policymaking. In total, 23 studies were included in the final review. A structured extraction form was developed to capture study characteristics, participant socio-demographics, participation activities, policy outputs and outcomes, and factors affecting participation. Descriptive analysis was performed on study characteristics, and content analysis was conducted on participation processes. Most studies (78%) were conducted in high-income countries, often overrepresenting women, younger cohorts, more educated and community-dwelling older adults. This participation was often ad hoc rather than institutionally established and supported. Older adults contributed to developing policy documents, shaping long-term outcomes, and enhancing personal well-being. The review identified participation enablers at individual and institutional levels and highlighted barriers such as time and resource constraints, health limitations, power imbalances, and ageism. The findings inform policy and program interventions to establish mechanisms for older adults' participation, address barriers for disadvantaged groups, and create meaningful pathways for translating their contributions into policy outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信