{"title":"【从高冈博士的论述谈“水俣病的慢性特征”】。","authors":"Makoto Futatsuka, Komyo Eto, Makoto Uchino","doi":"10.1265/jjh.24013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We received Dr. Takaoka's responses. The nine major points described in these responses were reviewed from the basic perspectives of epidemiology, toxicology and neuroscience. The responses indicate important failures in our views: exposure and health hazards are misconsidered from the toxicological perspective, mass biases in epidemiological surveys, and ignorance from the pathological viewpoint. We are looking forward to scientific discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":35643,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Hygiene","volume":"80 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Discussion About \\\"Chronic Feature of Minamata Disease\\\" Based on Dr. Takaoka's Response].\",\"authors\":\"Makoto Futatsuka, Komyo Eto, Makoto Uchino\",\"doi\":\"10.1265/jjh.24013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We received Dr. Takaoka's responses. The nine major points described in these responses were reviewed from the basic perspectives of epidemiology, toxicology and neuroscience. The responses indicate important failures in our views: exposure and health hazards are misconsidered from the toxicological perspective, mass biases in epidemiological surveys, and ignorance from the pathological viewpoint. We are looking forward to scientific discussion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Hygiene\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.24013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.24013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Discussion About "Chronic Feature of Minamata Disease" Based on Dr. Takaoka's Response].
We received Dr. Takaoka's responses. The nine major points described in these responses were reviewed from the basic perspectives of epidemiology, toxicology and neuroscience. The responses indicate important failures in our views: exposure and health hazards are misconsidered from the toxicological perspective, mass biases in epidemiological surveys, and ignorance from the pathological viewpoint. We are looking forward to scientific discussion.