儿童腹股沟疝腹腔镜经皮腹膜外缝合(LPEC)方法的疾病特异性模拟器:经验丰富的儿科外科医生和新手比较的验证研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Masakazu Murakami, Yumiko Tabata, Yumiko Iwamoto, Masato Ogata, Lynne Takada, Chihiro Kedoin, Yudai Tsuruno, Koshiro Sugita, Keisuke Yano, Shun Onishi, Takafumi Kawano, Satoshi Ieiri
{"title":"儿童腹股沟疝腹腔镜经皮腹膜外缝合(LPEC)方法的疾病特异性模拟器:经验丰富的儿科外科医生和新手比较的验证研究。","authors":"Masakazu Murakami, Yumiko Tabata, Yumiko Iwamoto, Masato Ogata, Lynne Takada, Chihiro Kedoin, Yudai Tsuruno, Koshiro Sugita, Keisuke Yano, Shun Onishi, Takafumi Kawano, Satoshi Ieiri","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure in the pediatric field and is one of the first pediatric endoscopic surgical procedures that a trainee should learn. Off-the-job training is important in pediatric surgery to compensate for the lack of experience due to the small number of cases. We developed a disease-specific simulator for laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) of inguinal hernia. We compared the results of simulated surgery using this simulator between experts and novices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The simulator was developed for a 1-year-old infant body size and allowed for training in needle manipulation unique to LPEC. The participants were pediatric surgeons and trainees and were divided into novice and experienced groups. The task involved simulated LPEC operations. The task completion time, three-dimensional characteristics of needle device manipulation evaluated by a magnetic three-dimensional position-measuring device, and accuracy of needle device manipulation evaluated by a checklist were compared. A questionnaire survey was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the simulator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 35 and 18 participants in the experienced and novice groups, respectively. The experienced group had a significantly shorter task completion time than the novice group (308.1 vs. 695.8 s, p < 0.001), shorter total pass length (37591.1 vs. 102678.1 mm, p = 0.001), slower average velocity (79.2 vs. 136.8 mm/s, p = 0.002), and lower average acceleration than the novice group (8477.9 vs. 17775.5 mm/s<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.005). The experienced group showed significantly better performance in the evaluation using a checklist. In the questionnaire survey, the effectiveness of the simulator was highly evaluated by experienced surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our simulator could clearly differentiate between novice and experienced surgeons, and the validity of the LPEC simulator was established. The validity of the LPEC simulator was also proven using a questionnaire survey after simulation surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Disease-Specific Simulator of the Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure (LPEC) Method for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Validation Study With Comparison of Experienced Pediatric Surgeons and Novices.\",\"authors\":\"Masakazu Murakami, Yumiko Tabata, Yumiko Iwamoto, Masato Ogata, Lynne Takada, Chihiro Kedoin, Yudai Tsuruno, Koshiro Sugita, Keisuke Yano, Shun Onishi, Takafumi Kawano, Satoshi Ieiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.70119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure in the pediatric field and is one of the first pediatric endoscopic surgical procedures that a trainee should learn. Off-the-job training is important in pediatric surgery to compensate for the lack of experience due to the small number of cases. We developed a disease-specific simulator for laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) of inguinal hernia. We compared the results of simulated surgery using this simulator between experts and novices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The simulator was developed for a 1-year-old infant body size and allowed for training in needle manipulation unique to LPEC. The participants were pediatric surgeons and trainees and were divided into novice and experienced groups. The task involved simulated LPEC operations. The task completion time, three-dimensional characteristics of needle device manipulation evaluated by a magnetic three-dimensional position-measuring device, and accuracy of needle device manipulation evaluated by a checklist were compared. A questionnaire survey was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the simulator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 35 and 18 participants in the experienced and novice groups, respectively. The experienced group had a significantly shorter task completion time than the novice group (308.1 vs. 695.8 s, p < 0.001), shorter total pass length (37591.1 vs. 102678.1 mm, p = 0.001), slower average velocity (79.2 vs. 136.8 mm/s, p = 0.002), and lower average acceleration than the novice group (8477.9 vs. 17775.5 mm/s<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.005). The experienced group showed significantly better performance in the evaluation using a checklist. In the questionnaire survey, the effectiveness of the simulator was highly evaluated by experienced surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our simulator could clearly differentiate between novice and experienced surgeons, and the validity of the LPEC simulator was established. The validity of the LPEC simulator was also proven using a questionnaire survey after simulation surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术是儿科领域最常见的手术,也是儿童内窥镜外科手术中首先要学习的手术之一。脱产培训在儿科外科中很重要,以弥补由于病例少而缺乏经验。我们开发了一种针对腹股沟疝腹腔镜经皮腹腔外闭合(LPEC)的疾病特异性模拟器。我们比较了专家和新手使用该模拟器进行模拟手术的结果。方法:该模拟器是针对1岁的婴儿体型开发的,并允许训练LPEC独有的针操作。参与者是儿科外科医生和实习医生,分为新手组和有经验组。该任务涉及模拟LPEC操作。比较了任务完成时间、用磁性三维测位仪评价针具操作的三维特征和用检查表评价针具操作的精度。通过问卷调查来评估模拟器的有效性。结果:经验组35人,新手组18人。经验组的任务完成时间明显短于新手组(308.1 vs 695.8 s, p 2, p = 0.005)。有经验的一组在使用检查表的评估中表现出明显更好的表现。在问卷调查中,经验丰富的外科医生对模拟器的有效性给予了高度评价。结论:该模拟器能明显区分新手和经验丰富的外科医生,验证了LPEC模拟器的有效性。模拟手术后通过问卷调查验证了LPEC模拟器的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Disease-Specific Simulator of the Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure (LPEC) Method for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Validation Study With Comparison of Experienced Pediatric Surgeons and Novices.

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure in the pediatric field and is one of the first pediatric endoscopic surgical procedures that a trainee should learn. Off-the-job training is important in pediatric surgery to compensate for the lack of experience due to the small number of cases. We developed a disease-specific simulator for laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) of inguinal hernia. We compared the results of simulated surgery using this simulator between experts and novices.

Methods: The simulator was developed for a 1-year-old infant body size and allowed for training in needle manipulation unique to LPEC. The participants were pediatric surgeons and trainees and were divided into novice and experienced groups. The task involved simulated LPEC operations. The task completion time, three-dimensional characteristics of needle device manipulation evaluated by a magnetic three-dimensional position-measuring device, and accuracy of needle device manipulation evaluated by a checklist were compared. A questionnaire survey was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the simulator.

Results: There were 35 and 18 participants in the experienced and novice groups, respectively. The experienced group had a significantly shorter task completion time than the novice group (308.1 vs. 695.8 s, p < 0.001), shorter total pass length (37591.1 vs. 102678.1 mm, p = 0.001), slower average velocity (79.2 vs. 136.8 mm/s, p = 0.002), and lower average acceleration than the novice group (8477.9 vs. 17775.5 mm/s2, p = 0.005). The experienced group showed significantly better performance in the evaluation using a checklist. In the questionnaire survey, the effectiveness of the simulator was highly evaluated by experienced surgeons.

Conclusion: Our simulator could clearly differentiate between novice and experienced surgeons, and the validity of the LPEC simulator was established. The validity of the LPEC simulator was also proven using a questionnaire survey after simulation surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信