虚拟骨科门诊随访上肢关节置换术在三级转诊中心。

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jack Thomson, Amanda Denton, Will Rudge, David Butt, Deborah Higgs, Mark Falworth, Addie Majed
{"title":"虚拟骨科门诊随访上肢关节置换术在三级转诊中心。","authors":"Jack Thomson, Amanda Denton, Will Rudge, David Butt, Deborah Higgs, Mark Falworth, Addie Majed","doi":"10.1177/17585732251380457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Follow-up for upper limb arthroplasty often requires costly and long-distance travel for patients. This pilot study outlines the process of implementing a virtual clinic (VC) review pathway, and assesses patient satisfaction, safety and costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trust ethics approval was sought prior to implementation. The VC review pathway involved a locally performed X-ray, requested by the general practitioner, followed by a proforma-based telephone questionnaire with a clinical nurse specialist. Following the VC appointment, a telephone satisfaction survey was performed, which included overall satisfaction, a friends and family test, and time for feedback. Conversion back to traditional clinic review and adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four patients were reviewed out of 101 invited. Of those, 89% reported the VC was the same or better than standard follow-up and 93% would recommend the VC to friends or family. There were no adverse events or missed diagnoses recorded.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This pilot study supports the introduction of a VC review pathway, which provides high satisfaction, reduced cost and no adverse events. Clarifying challenges highlighted by GPs and patients will improve uptake of the pathway. Our institution is now preparing to expand the pathway model to other disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251380457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual orthopaedic clinic follow-up for upper limb arthroplasty in a tertiary referral centre.\",\"authors\":\"Jack Thomson, Amanda Denton, Will Rudge, David Butt, Deborah Higgs, Mark Falworth, Addie Majed\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732251380457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Follow-up for upper limb arthroplasty often requires costly and long-distance travel for patients. This pilot study outlines the process of implementing a virtual clinic (VC) review pathway, and assesses patient satisfaction, safety and costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trust ethics approval was sought prior to implementation. The VC review pathway involved a locally performed X-ray, requested by the general practitioner, followed by a proforma-based telephone questionnaire with a clinical nurse specialist. Following the VC appointment, a telephone satisfaction survey was performed, which included overall satisfaction, a friends and family test, and time for feedback. Conversion back to traditional clinic review and adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four patients were reviewed out of 101 invited. Of those, 89% reported the VC was the same or better than standard follow-up and 93% would recommend the VC to friends or family. There were no adverse events or missed diagnoses recorded.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This pilot study supports the introduction of a VC review pathway, which provides high satisfaction, reduced cost and no adverse events. Clarifying challenges highlighted by GPs and patients will improve uptake of the pathway. Our institution is now preparing to expand the pathway model to other disciplines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732251380457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251380457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251380457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:上肢关节置换术的随访往往需要昂贵的费用和长途旅行。这项试点研究概述了实施虚拟诊所(VC)审查途径的过程,并评估了患者满意度、安全性和成本。方法:实施前进行信托伦理审批。VC审查途径包括全科医生要求在当地进行x光检查,然后由临床专科护士进行形式电话问卷调查。在VC任命之后,进行电话满意度调查,其中包括总体满意度,朋友和家人测试以及反馈时间。转换回传统的临床回顾和不良事件记录。结果:101例被邀请的患者中有84例被回顾。其中,89%的人表示风险投资与标准随访相同或更好,93%的人会向朋友或家人推荐风险投资。无不良事件或漏诊记录。讨论:本初步研究支持引入VC审查途径,该途径提供高满意度、低成本和无不良事件。澄清全科医生和患者强调的挑战将改善对该途径的吸收。我们的机构现在正准备将路径模式扩展到其他学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual orthopaedic clinic follow-up for upper limb arthroplasty in a tertiary referral centre.

Aim: Follow-up for upper limb arthroplasty often requires costly and long-distance travel for patients. This pilot study outlines the process of implementing a virtual clinic (VC) review pathway, and assesses patient satisfaction, safety and costs.

Methods: Trust ethics approval was sought prior to implementation. The VC review pathway involved a locally performed X-ray, requested by the general practitioner, followed by a proforma-based telephone questionnaire with a clinical nurse specialist. Following the VC appointment, a telephone satisfaction survey was performed, which included overall satisfaction, a friends and family test, and time for feedback. Conversion back to traditional clinic review and adverse events were recorded.

Results: Eighty-four patients were reviewed out of 101 invited. Of those, 89% reported the VC was the same or better than standard follow-up and 93% would recommend the VC to friends or family. There were no adverse events or missed diagnoses recorded.

Discussion: This pilot study supports the introduction of a VC review pathway, which provides high satisfaction, reduced cost and no adverse events. Clarifying challenges highlighted by GPs and patients will improve uptake of the pathway. Our institution is now preparing to expand the pathway model to other disciplines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信