臂丛出生损伤所致肘关节屈曲挛缩的手术治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Irene Escudero, Javier Gutierrez-Pereira, Jorge Salvador, Alfonso Ley, Antonio Garcia-Lopez
{"title":"臂丛出生损伤所致肘关节屈曲挛缩的手术治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Irene Escudero, Javier Gutierrez-Pereira, Jorge Salvador, Alfonso Ley, Antonio Garcia-Lopez","doi":"10.1177/17585732251380555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatments for elbow flexion contracture in patients with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI), as well as to assess postoperative complications-specifically, loss of elbow flexion-associated with these interventions. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare pre- and postoperative outcomes across different surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Eight case series were included, reporting on anterior release, olecranon resection, biceps tendon lengthening, and gradual arthrodiastasis. Mean differences in elbow extension gain and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses considered follow-up duration and age at surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2700 initially screened articles, eight were included. The mean gain in elbow extension was 29.69° (CI: 23.69-35.53, <i>p</i> < .00001). Gradual arthrodiastasis achieved the highest improvement (47.00°, CI: 37.08-56.92), followed by anterior release (30.36°, CI: 26.56-34.16). Subgroup analysis showed better outcomes in the 12-36 month follow-up group (29.83°, CI: 22.66-37.01). Furthermore, patients over 18 years of age showed the greatest improvement (47.00°, CI: 37.08-59.92); however, this result is based solely on a single study that utilized gradual arthrodiastasis, thereby limiting its generalizability .No significant loss of elbow flexion was observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Surgical interventions significantly improve elbow extension in BPBI patients. Gradual arthrodiastasis is the most effective, though variability in techniques limits direct comparison. Standardized protocols and long-term prospective studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251380555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical treatment of elbow flexion contracture due to brachial plexus birth injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Irene Escudero, Javier Gutierrez-Pereira, Jorge Salvador, Alfonso Ley, Antonio Garcia-Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732251380555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatments for elbow flexion contracture in patients with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI), as well as to assess postoperative complications-specifically, loss of elbow flexion-associated with these interventions. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare pre- and postoperative outcomes across different surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Eight case series were included, reporting on anterior release, olecranon resection, biceps tendon lengthening, and gradual arthrodiastasis. Mean differences in elbow extension gain and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses considered follow-up duration and age at surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2700 initially screened articles, eight were included. The mean gain in elbow extension was 29.69° (CI: 23.69-35.53, <i>p</i> < .00001). Gradual arthrodiastasis achieved the highest improvement (47.00°, CI: 37.08-56.92), followed by anterior release (30.36°, CI: 26.56-34.16). Subgroup analysis showed better outcomes in the 12-36 month follow-up group (29.83°, CI: 22.66-37.01). Furthermore, patients over 18 years of age showed the greatest improvement (47.00°, CI: 37.08-59.92); however, this result is based solely on a single study that utilized gradual arthrodiastasis, thereby limiting its generalizability .No significant loss of elbow flexion was observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Surgical interventions significantly improve elbow extension in BPBI patients. Gradual arthrodiastasis is the most effective, though variability in techniques limits direct comparison. Standardized protocols and long-term prospective studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732251380555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488615/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251380555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251380555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估手术治疗臂丛出生损伤(BPBI)患者肘关节屈曲挛缩的有效性,并评估与这些干预措施相关的术后并发症,特别是肘关节屈曲的丧失。进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以比较不同手术技术的术前和术后结果。方法:在PubMed、Scopus和Embase中进行系统检索。我们纳入了8个病例系列,报道了前路松解、鹰嘴切除、肱二头肌肌腱延长和逐渐的关节分离。计算肘部伸展增益和95%置信区间(ci)的平均差异。亚组分析考虑随访时间和手术年龄。结果:在最初筛选的2700篇文章中,有8篇被纳入。肘关节伸展的平均增益为29.69°(CI: 23.69-35.53, p)。渐进式关节分离是最有效的,尽管技术的差异限制了直接比较。标准化方案和长期前瞻性研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical treatment of elbow flexion contracture due to brachial plexus birth injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatments for elbow flexion contracture in patients with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI), as well as to assess postoperative complications-specifically, loss of elbow flexion-associated with these interventions. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare pre- and postoperative outcomes across different surgical techniques.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Eight case series were included, reporting on anterior release, olecranon resection, biceps tendon lengthening, and gradual arthrodiastasis. Mean differences in elbow extension gain and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses considered follow-up duration and age at surgery.

Results: Out of 2700 initially screened articles, eight were included. The mean gain in elbow extension was 29.69° (CI: 23.69-35.53, p < .00001). Gradual arthrodiastasis achieved the highest improvement (47.00°, CI: 37.08-56.92), followed by anterior release (30.36°, CI: 26.56-34.16). Subgroup analysis showed better outcomes in the 12-36 month follow-up group (29.83°, CI: 22.66-37.01). Furthermore, patients over 18 years of age showed the greatest improvement (47.00°, CI: 37.08-59.92); however, this result is based solely on a single study that utilized gradual arthrodiastasis, thereby limiting its generalizability .No significant loss of elbow flexion was observed.

Discussion: Surgical interventions significantly improve elbow extension in BPBI patients. Gradual arthrodiastasis is the most effective, though variability in techniques limits direct comparison. Standardized protocols and long-term prospective studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信