背侧入路皮质类固醇注射治疗扳机指:范围综述。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Muhammadhasan Nasser, Kaitlyn Soro, Natasha Barone, Kevin J Zuo
{"title":"背侧入路皮质类固醇注射治疗扳机指:范围综述。","authors":"Muhammadhasan Nasser, Kaitlyn Soro, Natasha Barone, Kevin J Zuo","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger) is a common condition caused by inflammation and hypertrophy of flexor tendons. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) is an effective and safe treatment option. A palmar approach for CSI is typically used; however dorsal injection, which may be less painful, is not well-studied. <b>Methods:</b> A 6-stage scoping review was conducted to characterize outcomes associated with dorsal CSI for trigger finger management. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for eligible articles in English from inception to July 2024. Data regarding study characteristics and CSI outcomes were synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. <b>Results:</b> Four articles were included in the review, comprising 1 case series, 2 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT). Symptom resolution rates following dorsal CSI ranged from 54% to 73.5%, comparable to a palmar approach. Two studies compared dorsal and palmar injections and found no significant differences in effectiveness. Pain scores for dorsal injections were similar or significantly lower than those for palmar injections in 2 studies. No adverse effects or complications were reported with either injection technique. <b>Conclusion:</b> Current evidence suggests a dorsal approach for CSI in trigger finger management is noninferior to a palmar approach in terms of efficacy and safety, with potential benefits in reducing injection-associated pain. However, more high-quality studies, including RCTs, are needed. Future research should assess anesthetic distribution and patient-reported outcomes to better understand the clinical implications of a dorsal CSI approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379892"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dorsal Approach for Corticosteroid Injection in Trigger Finger Management: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammadhasan Nasser, Kaitlyn Soro, Natasha Barone, Kevin J Zuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22925503251379892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger) is a common condition caused by inflammation and hypertrophy of flexor tendons. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) is an effective and safe treatment option. A palmar approach for CSI is typically used; however dorsal injection, which may be less painful, is not well-studied. <b>Methods:</b> A 6-stage scoping review was conducted to characterize outcomes associated with dorsal CSI for trigger finger management. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for eligible articles in English from inception to July 2024. Data regarding study characteristics and CSI outcomes were synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. <b>Results:</b> Four articles were included in the review, comprising 1 case series, 2 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT). Symptom resolution rates following dorsal CSI ranged from 54% to 73.5%, comparable to a palmar approach. Two studies compared dorsal and palmar injections and found no significant differences in effectiveness. Pain scores for dorsal injections were similar or significantly lower than those for palmar injections in 2 studies. No adverse effects or complications were reported with either injection technique. <b>Conclusion:</b> Current evidence suggests a dorsal approach for CSI in trigger finger management is noninferior to a palmar approach in terms of efficacy and safety, with potential benefits in reducing injection-associated pain. However, more high-quality studies, including RCTs, are needed. Future research should assess anesthetic distribution and patient-reported outcomes to better understand the clinical implications of a dorsal CSI approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"22925503251379892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251379892\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251379892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:狭窄性腱鞘炎(扳机指)是由屈肌腱炎症和肥大引起的一种常见疾病。皮质类固醇注射(CSI)是一种有效和安全的治疗选择。CSI通常采用手掌法;然而,背侧注射可能较少疼痛,但尚未得到充分研究。方法:进行了一项6阶段的范围审查,以表征与扳机指管理的背侧CSI相关的结果。我们检索了Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE和Web of Science,检索了从创立到2024年7月的符合条件的英文文章。综合有关研究特征和CSI结果的数据。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入4篇文献,包括1个病例系列、2个队列研究和1个随机对照试验(RCT)。背侧CSI后症状缓解率为54%至73.5%,与掌侧入路相当。两项研究比较了背部注射和手掌注射,发现效果没有显著差异。2项研究中,背部注射的疼痛评分与掌部注射相似或显著低于掌部注射。两种注射方法均无不良反应或并发症报道。结论:目前的证据表明,在触发指的CSI治疗中,背侧入路的疗效和安全性不亚于掌侧入路,在减少注射相关疼痛方面具有潜在的优势。然而,需要更多高质量的研究,包括随机对照试验。未来的研究应评估麻醉分布和患者报告的结果,以更好地了解背侧CSI入路的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dorsal Approach for Corticosteroid Injection in Trigger Finger Management: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger) is a common condition caused by inflammation and hypertrophy of flexor tendons. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) is an effective and safe treatment option. A palmar approach for CSI is typically used; however dorsal injection, which may be less painful, is not well-studied. Methods: A 6-stage scoping review was conducted to characterize outcomes associated with dorsal CSI for trigger finger management. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for eligible articles in English from inception to July 2024. Data regarding study characteristics and CSI outcomes were synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Results: Four articles were included in the review, comprising 1 case series, 2 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT). Symptom resolution rates following dorsal CSI ranged from 54% to 73.5%, comparable to a palmar approach. Two studies compared dorsal and palmar injections and found no significant differences in effectiveness. Pain scores for dorsal injections were similar or significantly lower than those for palmar injections in 2 studies. No adverse effects or complications were reported with either injection technique. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests a dorsal approach for CSI in trigger finger management is noninferior to a palmar approach in terms of efficacy and safety, with potential benefits in reducing injection-associated pain. However, more high-quality studies, including RCTs, are needed. Future research should assess anesthetic distribution and patient-reported outcomes to better understand the clinical implications of a dorsal CSI approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信