脑电图对成年创伤性脑损伤危重患者预后价值的系统评价。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marit Verboom, Robert van den Berg, Mark van de Ruit, Mathieu van der Jagt
{"title":"脑电图对成年创伤性脑损伤危重患者预后价值的系统评价。","authors":"Marit Verboom, Robert van den Berg, Mark van de Ruit, Mathieu van der Jagt","doi":"10.1177/08977151251381351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prognostication after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite the existence of well-validated online prognostication tools. Changes in brain activity related to TBI can be measured using electroencephalography (EEG), making it a potentially interesting diagnostic tool to refine prognostication. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature concerning the prognostic value of EEG among patients with TBI in the ICU. Five databases were searched from inception until August 13, 2024. The search identified 1492 unique records. Eventually, 27 manuscripts met the inclusion criteria (>18 years old, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12, EEG performed in the ICU). The QUIPS (QUality In Prognostic Studies) and PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) tools were used to assess the study quality and bias. Due to high heterogeneity in EEG feature and outcome definitions and a lack of correction for confounding factors, all studies had a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Nonetheless, specific EEG features (identified through visual and quantitative EEG, EEG reactivity, and machine learning techniques) were found to be predictive of neurological outcomes up to 1.5 years after TBI. While epileptiform discharges and seizures were not consistently associated with outcomes, a higher alpha variability, a more continuous EEG, present EEG reactivity, and present EEG sleep features were predictive of better outcomes. The combination of EEG features with clinical parameters demonstrated improved predictive performance compared with models using standard clinical parameters alone. Still, the EEG features described and their potential additional value in outcome prediction after TBI merit further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Value of Electroencephalography in Critically Ill Adult Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Marit Verboom, Robert van den Berg, Mark van de Ruit, Mathieu van der Jagt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08977151251381351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prognostication after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite the existence of well-validated online prognostication tools. Changes in brain activity related to TBI can be measured using electroencephalography (EEG), making it a potentially interesting diagnostic tool to refine prognostication. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature concerning the prognostic value of EEG among patients with TBI in the ICU. Five databases were searched from inception until August 13, 2024. The search identified 1492 unique records. Eventually, 27 manuscripts met the inclusion criteria (>18 years old, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12, EEG performed in the ICU). The QUIPS (QUality In Prognostic Studies) and PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) tools were used to assess the study quality and bias. Due to high heterogeneity in EEG feature and outcome definitions and a lack of correction for confounding factors, all studies had a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Nonetheless, specific EEG features (identified through visual and quantitative EEG, EEG reactivity, and machine learning techniques) were found to be predictive of neurological outcomes up to 1.5 years after TBI. While epileptiform discharges and seizures were not consistently associated with outcomes, a higher alpha variability, a more continuous EEG, present EEG reactivity, and present EEG sleep features were predictive of better outcomes. The combination of EEG features with clinical parameters demonstrated improved predictive performance compared with models using standard clinical parameters alone. Still, the EEG features described and their potential additional value in outcome prediction after TBI merit further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251381351\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251381351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管存在经过良好验证的在线预测工具,但在重症监护病房(ICU)中,中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的预测仍然具有挑战性。脑电描记术(EEG)可以测量与脑外伤相关的脑活动变化,使其成为一种潜在的有趣的诊断工具,以改进预后。本系统综述的主要目的是评价有关脑电图对ICU TBI患者预后价值的文献。从成立到2024年8月13日,共搜索了5个数据库。搜索确定了1492条独特的记录。最终,27篇文章符合纳入标准(>,18岁,格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤12,脑电图在ICU进行)。使用QUIPS(预后研究质量)和PROBAST(预测模型偏倚风险评估工具)工具评估研究质量和偏倚。由于脑电图特征和结果定义的高度异质性以及缺乏对混杂因素的校正,所有研究都有中等至高度的偏倚风险。尽管如此,特定的脑电图特征(通过视觉和定量脑电图、脑电图反应性和机器学习技术识别)被发现可以预测TBI后1.5年的神经预后。虽然癫痫样放电和癫痫发作与结果并不一致相关,但较高的α变异性、更连续的脑电图、当前脑电图反应性和当前脑电图睡眠特征可预测更好的结果。与单独使用标准临床参数的模型相比,脑电图特征与临床参数的组合显示出更好的预测性能。尽管如此,所描述的脑电图特征及其在TBI后预后预测中的潜在附加价值值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Value of Electroencephalography in Critically Ill Adult Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Prognostication after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite the existence of well-validated online prognostication tools. Changes in brain activity related to TBI can be measured using electroencephalography (EEG), making it a potentially interesting diagnostic tool to refine prognostication. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature concerning the prognostic value of EEG among patients with TBI in the ICU. Five databases were searched from inception until August 13, 2024. The search identified 1492 unique records. Eventually, 27 manuscripts met the inclusion criteria (>18 years old, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12, EEG performed in the ICU). The QUIPS (QUality In Prognostic Studies) and PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) tools were used to assess the study quality and bias. Due to high heterogeneity in EEG feature and outcome definitions and a lack of correction for confounding factors, all studies had a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Nonetheless, specific EEG features (identified through visual and quantitative EEG, EEG reactivity, and machine learning techniques) were found to be predictive of neurological outcomes up to 1.5 years after TBI. While epileptiform discharges and seizures were not consistently associated with outcomes, a higher alpha variability, a more continuous EEG, present EEG reactivity, and present EEG sleep features were predictive of better outcomes. The combination of EEG features with clinical parameters demonstrated improved predictive performance compared with models using standard clinical parameters alone. Still, the EEG features described and their potential additional value in outcome prediction after TBI merit further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信