将环境因素纳入卫生技术评估:荷兰利益相关者的定性研究。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rhiannon C Reising, Mohamed El Alili, Merel L Kimman, Mickael Hiligsmann
{"title":"将环境因素纳入卫生技术评估:荷兰利益相关者的定性研究。","authors":"Rhiannon C Reising, Mohamed El Alili, Merel L Kimman, Mickael Hiligsmann","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325100536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Dutch National Health Care Institute (ZIN) advises the Dutch Minister of Health on the basic benefit package using Health Technology Assessment (HTA), focusing on necessity, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility. Despite the huge environmental impact of the healthcare sector, this impact is not taken into consideration. Several methodological approaches to integrate the environmental impact into HTA have been proposed, including information conduit, integrated evaluation, parallel evaluation, and environment-focused evaluation. There is significant uncertainty as to which approach is the most appropriate. Therefore, it is important to understand stakeholders' perspectives on these approaches.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore Dutch stakeholders' perspectives on integrating environmental impacts into HTA and assess preferred methods and challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using a focus group with members from ZIN (n = 7) and individual interviews (n = 7) with experts in HTA, market access, and reimbursement. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders highlighted the importance of addressing environmental impacts such as pharmaceutical pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and waste. Integrated and parallel evaluations were preferred, but barriers such as data gaps, methodological complexity, and lack of guidelines were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating environmental impacts into HTA is crucial but requires clear guidelines, better data, and stakeholder collaboration to support sustainable healthcare practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"41 1","pages":"e71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Environmental Aspects into Health Technology Assessment: A Qualitative Study among Dutch Stakeholders.\",\"authors\":\"Rhiannon C Reising, Mohamed El Alili, Merel L Kimman, Mickael Hiligsmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462325100536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Dutch National Health Care Institute (ZIN) advises the Dutch Minister of Health on the basic benefit package using Health Technology Assessment (HTA), focusing on necessity, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility. Despite the huge environmental impact of the healthcare sector, this impact is not taken into consideration. Several methodological approaches to integrate the environmental impact into HTA have been proposed, including information conduit, integrated evaluation, parallel evaluation, and environment-focused evaluation. There is significant uncertainty as to which approach is the most appropriate. Therefore, it is important to understand stakeholders' perspectives on these approaches.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore Dutch stakeholders' perspectives on integrating environmental impacts into HTA and assess preferred methods and challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using a focus group with members from ZIN (n = 7) and individual interviews (n = 7) with experts in HTA, market access, and reimbursement. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders highlighted the importance of addressing environmental impacts such as pharmaceutical pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and waste. Integrated and parallel evaluations were preferred, but barriers such as data gaps, methodological complexity, and lack of guidelines were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating environmental impacts into HTA is crucial but requires clear guidelines, better data, and stakeholder collaboration to support sustainable healthcare practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"e71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100536\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:荷兰国家卫生保健研究所(ZIN)就使用卫生技术评估(HTA)的基本福利方案向荷兰卫生部长提供建议,重点关注必要性、临床效果、成本效益和可行性。尽管医疗保健行业对环境有巨大的影响,但这种影响并没有被考虑在内。提出了将环境影响纳入HTA的几种方法方法,包括信息渠道评价、综合评价、平行评价和环境评价。至于哪一种方法是最合适的,存在很大的不确定性。因此,了解涉众对这些方法的看法是很重要的。目的:探讨荷兰利益相关者对将环境影响纳入HTA的观点,并评估首选方法和挑战。方法:采用焦点小组(n = 7)和对HTA、市场准入和报销专家的个别访谈(n = 7)进行定性研究。采访被记录下来并按主题进行分析。结果:利益相关者强调了解决药物污染、温室气体排放和废物等环境影响的重要性。综合和并行评价是首选,但注意到数据差距、方法复杂性和缺乏指导方针等障碍。结论:将环境影响纳入HTA至关重要,但需要明确的指导方针、更好的数据和利益相关者的合作,以支持可持续的医疗保健实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Environmental Aspects into Health Technology Assessment: A Qualitative Study among Dutch Stakeholders.

Background: The Dutch National Health Care Institute (ZIN) advises the Dutch Minister of Health on the basic benefit package using Health Technology Assessment (HTA), focusing on necessity, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility. Despite the huge environmental impact of the healthcare sector, this impact is not taken into consideration. Several methodological approaches to integrate the environmental impact into HTA have been proposed, including information conduit, integrated evaluation, parallel evaluation, and environment-focused evaluation. There is significant uncertainty as to which approach is the most appropriate. Therefore, it is important to understand stakeholders' perspectives on these approaches.

Objectives: To explore Dutch stakeholders' perspectives on integrating environmental impacts into HTA and assess preferred methods and challenges.

Methods: A qualitative study using a focus group with members from ZIN (n = 7) and individual interviews (n = 7) with experts in HTA, market access, and reimbursement. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically.

Results: Stakeholders highlighted the importance of addressing environmental impacts such as pharmaceutical pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and waste. Integrated and parallel evaluations were preferred, but barriers such as data gaps, methodological complexity, and lack of guidelines were noted.

Conclusion: Incorporating environmental impacts into HTA is crucial but requires clear guidelines, better data, and stakeholder collaboration to support sustainable healthcare practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信