健康传播的代际数字鸿沟:中国社会媒体使用动机、感知社会支持与心理健康

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Yuqiu Chen, Wenhao Yang, Xiaofan Zhang, Yibo Wu
{"title":"健康传播的代际数字鸿沟:中国社会媒体使用动机、感知社会支持与心理健康","authors":"Yuqiu Chen, Wenhao Yang, Xiaofan Zhang, Yibo Wu","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2567514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a growing body of research that has examined the correlation between social media usage and mental health, two limitations remain: the lack of generational comparative studies and the oversimplification of social media use measurements in previous research, which often focused on frequency, duration, and active/passive usage. Drawing on two cross-sectional Chinese datasets (Study 1: <i>N</i> = 30,054; Study 2: <i>N</i> = 603), this study investigated the generational differences in \"social media use → perceived social support → mental health\" from a motivation perspective. Study 1 found that older adults reported lower levels of social media use motivations, while younger and middle-aged individuals showed higher engagement. For young adults, each social media use motivation was positively related to perceived social support, which in turn was linked to better mental health. Among middle-aged adults, the same pattern held for four motivations, but seeking self-status did not show a positive association with perceived social support. In contrast, among older adults, all media motivations, except for relaxation, were associated with perceived social support and mental health outcomes negatively, highlighting a generational digital divide. Study 2 replicated some findings of Study 1 and found that emotional social support - rather than informational support - could significantly mediate the relationship between information-seeking motivation and mental health. These findings underscore the need for tailored health communication strategies and interventions that account for generational differences and help bridge the digital divide.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generational Digital Divide of Health Communication: Social Media Use Motivations, Perceived Social Support, and Mental Health in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yuqiu Chen, Wenhao Yang, Xiaofan Zhang, Yibo Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2025.2567514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite a growing body of research that has examined the correlation between social media usage and mental health, two limitations remain: the lack of generational comparative studies and the oversimplification of social media use measurements in previous research, which often focused on frequency, duration, and active/passive usage. Drawing on two cross-sectional Chinese datasets (Study 1: <i>N</i> = 30,054; Study 2: <i>N</i> = 603), this study investigated the generational differences in \\\"social media use → perceived social support → mental health\\\" from a motivation perspective. Study 1 found that older adults reported lower levels of social media use motivations, while younger and middle-aged individuals showed higher engagement. For young adults, each social media use motivation was positively related to perceived social support, which in turn was linked to better mental health. Among middle-aged adults, the same pattern held for four motivations, but seeking self-status did not show a positive association with perceived social support. In contrast, among older adults, all media motivations, except for relaxation, were associated with perceived social support and mental health outcomes negatively, highlighting a generational digital divide. Study 2 replicated some findings of Study 1 and found that emotional social support - rather than informational support - could significantly mediate the relationship between information-seeking motivation and mental health. These findings underscore the need for tailored health communication strategies and interventions that account for generational differences and help bridge the digital divide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2567514\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2567514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管越来越多的研究调查了社交媒体使用与心理健康之间的相关性,但仍然存在两个局限性:缺乏代际比较研究,以及之前的研究中对社交媒体使用的测量过于简化,这些研究通常侧重于频率、持续时间和主动/被动使用。本研究利用中国两组横断面数据集(研究1:N = 30,054;研究2:N = 603),从动机角度考察了“社交媒体使用→感知社会支持→心理健康”的代际差异。研究1发现,老年人使用社交媒体的动机较低,而年轻人和中年人则表现出更高的参与度。对于年轻人来说,每种社交媒体使用动机都与感知到的社会支持呈正相关,而社会支持又与更好的心理健康有关。在中年人中,同样的模式也适用于四种动机,但寻求自我地位与感知到的社会支持没有正相关。相比之下,在老年人中,除了放松之外,所有媒体动机都与感知到的社会支持和心理健康结果呈负相关,突出了代际数字鸿沟。研究2重复了研究1的一些发现,发现情感社会支持(而非信息支持)能显著调节信息寻求动机与心理健康之间的关系。这些发现强调,需要制定量身定制的卫生传播战略和干预措施,以考虑代际差异并帮助弥合数字鸿沟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generational Digital Divide of Health Communication: Social Media Use Motivations, Perceived Social Support, and Mental Health in China.

Despite a growing body of research that has examined the correlation between social media usage and mental health, two limitations remain: the lack of generational comparative studies and the oversimplification of social media use measurements in previous research, which often focused on frequency, duration, and active/passive usage. Drawing on two cross-sectional Chinese datasets (Study 1: N = 30,054; Study 2: N = 603), this study investigated the generational differences in "social media use → perceived social support → mental health" from a motivation perspective. Study 1 found that older adults reported lower levels of social media use motivations, while younger and middle-aged individuals showed higher engagement. For young adults, each social media use motivation was positively related to perceived social support, which in turn was linked to better mental health. Among middle-aged adults, the same pattern held for four motivations, but seeking self-status did not show a positive association with perceived social support. In contrast, among older adults, all media motivations, except for relaxation, were associated with perceived social support and mental health outcomes negatively, highlighting a generational digital divide. Study 2 replicated some findings of Study 1 and found that emotional social support - rather than informational support - could significantly mediate the relationship between information-seeking motivation and mental health. These findings underscore the need for tailored health communication strategies and interventions that account for generational differences and help bridge the digital divide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信