听不见的声音:中国妇女健康经验中的交流(不)权利。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Yanpei Chen, Jeanine Warisse Turner
{"title":"听不见的声音:中国妇女健康经验中的交流(不)权利。","authors":"Yanpei Chen, Jeanine Warisse Turner","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2566974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In China, despite global awareness of the importance of gender equity as it relates to healthcare, attention to women's health issues especially gynecological conditions lags behind. These challenges stem from deficiencies in health education and the persistence of social norms discounting women's health problems and women's pain. To explore and amplify voices of women and their health experiences, this study employed the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement (TCD) as a framework to analyze the communication challenges Chinese females face. Analysis of 27 in-depth interviews revealed two dominant ideologies: the subordination of women to men and the stigmatization of women's gynecological functions as \"dirty.\" These ideologies drive both societal-level ramifications (stereotyping, restrictive rules, healthcare system limitations, and knowledge embargo) and personal-level ramifications, including emotional distress (e.g. anxiety, self-doubt) and behavioral changes (e.g. reluctance to seek medical help). Additionally, participants identified six functions of (Dis)enfranchising Talk (DT), including discrediting, reducing, stereotyping, silencing, dominating, and disregarding, which manifest across interpersonal and organizational discursive spaces. Women's responses to DT ranged from passive compliance to proactive strategies. This study broadens the scope of TCD literature by revealing the communicative mechanisms that perpetuate (dis)enfranchisement within China's unique cultural, historical, and systemic contexts, thereby challenging, enriching, and extending TCD theorizing beyond its traditional Western-centric focus.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unheard Voices: Communicative (Dis)enfranchisement in Women's Health Experiences in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yanpei Chen, Jeanine Warisse Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2025.2566974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In China, despite global awareness of the importance of gender equity as it relates to healthcare, attention to women's health issues especially gynecological conditions lags behind. These challenges stem from deficiencies in health education and the persistence of social norms discounting women's health problems and women's pain. To explore and amplify voices of women and their health experiences, this study employed the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement (TCD) as a framework to analyze the communication challenges Chinese females face. Analysis of 27 in-depth interviews revealed two dominant ideologies: the subordination of women to men and the stigmatization of women's gynecological functions as \\\"dirty.\\\" These ideologies drive both societal-level ramifications (stereotyping, restrictive rules, healthcare system limitations, and knowledge embargo) and personal-level ramifications, including emotional distress (e.g. anxiety, self-doubt) and behavioral changes (e.g. reluctance to seek medical help). Additionally, participants identified six functions of (Dis)enfranchising Talk (DT), including discrediting, reducing, stereotyping, silencing, dominating, and disregarding, which manifest across interpersonal and organizational discursive spaces. Women's responses to DT ranged from passive compliance to proactive strategies. This study broadens the scope of TCD literature by revealing the communicative mechanisms that perpetuate (dis)enfranchisement within China's unique cultural, historical, and systemic contexts, thereby challenging, enriching, and extending TCD theorizing beyond its traditional Western-centric focus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2566974\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2566974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国,尽管全球都意识到性别平等在医疗保健方面的重要性,但对妇女健康问题,特别是妇科疾病的关注却滞后。这些挑战源于保健教育的不足和持续存在的忽视妇女健康问题和妇女痛苦的社会规范。为了探索和放大女性的声音和她们的健康经历,本研究以沟通(不)授权(TCD)理论为框架,分析了中国女性面临的沟通挑战。对27个深度访谈的分析揭示了两种占主导地位的意识形态:女性从属于男性,以及将女性的妇科功能污名化为“肮脏”。这些意识形态造成了社会层面的影响(刻板印象、限制性规则、医疗保健系统限制和知识封锁)和个人层面的影响,包括情绪困扰(例如焦虑、自我怀疑)和行为改变(例如不愿寻求医疗帮助)。此外,参与者还确定了(Dis)赋予谈话(DT)的六种功能,包括诋毁、减少、刻板印象、沉默、支配和无视,这些功能在人际和组织话语空间中都有体现。女性对DT的反应从被动服从到主动策略不等。本研究通过揭示在中国独特的文化、历史和制度背景下延续(剥夺)选举权的交流机制,拓宽了TCD文献的范围,从而挑战、丰富和扩展了传统的以西方为中心的TCD理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unheard Voices: Communicative (Dis)enfranchisement in Women's Health Experiences in China.

In China, despite global awareness of the importance of gender equity as it relates to healthcare, attention to women's health issues especially gynecological conditions lags behind. These challenges stem from deficiencies in health education and the persistence of social norms discounting women's health problems and women's pain. To explore and amplify voices of women and their health experiences, this study employed the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement (TCD) as a framework to analyze the communication challenges Chinese females face. Analysis of 27 in-depth interviews revealed two dominant ideologies: the subordination of women to men and the stigmatization of women's gynecological functions as "dirty." These ideologies drive both societal-level ramifications (stereotyping, restrictive rules, healthcare system limitations, and knowledge embargo) and personal-level ramifications, including emotional distress (e.g. anxiety, self-doubt) and behavioral changes (e.g. reluctance to seek medical help). Additionally, participants identified six functions of (Dis)enfranchising Talk (DT), including discrediting, reducing, stereotyping, silencing, dominating, and disregarding, which manifest across interpersonal and organizational discursive spaces. Women's responses to DT ranged from passive compliance to proactive strategies. This study broadens the scope of TCD literature by revealing the communicative mechanisms that perpetuate (dis)enfranchisement within China's unique cultural, historical, and systemic contexts, thereby challenging, enriching, and extending TCD theorizing beyond its traditional Western-centric focus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信