将健康筛查和管理的社会驱动因素纳入产前护理:混合方法实施评估方案。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Paige Anderson, Vanessa Neustrom, Samantha Hepting, M Kathryn Menard, Keziah Cash, Korene Gbozah, Jennifer Tang
{"title":"将健康筛查和管理的社会驱动因素纳入产前护理:混合方法实施评估方案。","authors":"Paige Anderson, Vanessa Neustrom, Samantha Hepting, M Kathryn Menard, Keziah Cash, Korene Gbozah, Jennifer Tang","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social drivers of health (SDOH), such as housing stability, food security and access to transportation, profoundly influence both healthcare access and health outcomes. In pregnancy, screening positively for SDOH domains correlates with poorer perinatal outcomes. While the American college of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends screening for SDOH at every routine prenatal visit, many prenatal practices struggle to systematically screen patients for SDOH. This study evaluates the implementation of a universal SDOH screening and management protocol in prenatal care and aims to bridge the gap between the recommendation for universal SDOH screening in prenatal care and its actual integration by evaluating implementation strategies that can serve as a guide for other prenatal care clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This multi-site, prospective formative implementation evaluation will assess the integration of standardised SDOH screening and management into prenatal care workflows at four prenatal clinic sites within an academic Obstetrics and Gynaecology department. The study employs a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods approach integrating chart-abstracted patient data, staff surveys, and staff and patient semi-structured interviews, guided by established implementation science frameworks (exploration, preparation, implementation and sustainment, consolidated framework for implementation research and implementation outcomes framework). Key implementation strategies include workflow integration, electronic medical record optimisation, role clarification and comprehensive training. Implementation outcomes to be evaluated include feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study was approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Institutional Review Board (IRB #24-3104). Verbal informed consent will be obtained from all interview participants, and consent will be embedded in staff surveys. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder meetings and directly to participating clinical sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e104837"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating social drivers of health screening and management into prenatal care: protocol for a mixed-methods implementation evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Paige Anderson, Vanessa Neustrom, Samantha Hepting, M Kathryn Menard, Keziah Cash, Korene Gbozah, Jennifer Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social drivers of health (SDOH), such as housing stability, food security and access to transportation, profoundly influence both healthcare access and health outcomes. In pregnancy, screening positively for SDOH domains correlates with poorer perinatal outcomes. While the American college of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends screening for SDOH at every routine prenatal visit, many prenatal practices struggle to systematically screen patients for SDOH. This study evaluates the implementation of a universal SDOH screening and management protocol in prenatal care and aims to bridge the gap between the recommendation for universal SDOH screening in prenatal care and its actual integration by evaluating implementation strategies that can serve as a guide for other prenatal care clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This multi-site, prospective formative implementation evaluation will assess the integration of standardised SDOH screening and management into prenatal care workflows at four prenatal clinic sites within an academic Obstetrics and Gynaecology department. The study employs a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods approach integrating chart-abstracted patient data, staff surveys, and staff and patient semi-structured interviews, guided by established implementation science frameworks (exploration, preparation, implementation and sustainment, consolidated framework for implementation research and implementation outcomes framework). Key implementation strategies include workflow integration, electronic medical record optimisation, role clarification and comprehensive training. Implementation outcomes to be evaluated include feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study was approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Institutional Review Board (IRB #24-3104). Verbal informed consent will be obtained from all interview participants, and consent will be embedded in staff surveys. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder meetings and directly to participating clinical sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"e104837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104837\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104837","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康的社会驱动因素(SDOH),如住房稳定性、粮食安全和交通可及性,深刻影响医疗保健可及性和健康结果。在妊娠期,SDOH结构域阳性筛查与较差的围产期结局相关。虽然美国妇产科医师学会建议在每次常规产前检查时进行SDOH筛查,但许多产前诊所难以系统地筛查患者的SDOH。本研究评估了产前护理中SDOH普遍筛查和管理方案的实施情况,旨在通过评估实施策略,弥合产前护理中SDOH普遍筛查的建议与实际整合之间的差距,为其他产前护理诊所提供指导。方法和分析:这个多地点,前瞻性形成性实施评估将评估标准化SDOH筛查和管理整合到一个学术产科和妇科的四个产前诊所的产前护理工作流程中。本研究采用并行三角测量混合方法,结合图表抽象的患者数据、工作人员调查和工作人员与患者半结构化访谈,并以已建立的实施科学框架(探索、准备、实施和维持、实施研究综合框架和实施结果框架)为指导。关键的实施策略包括工作流集成、电子病历优化、角色明确和全面培训。要评估的实施结果包括可行性、可接受性、适当性、采用度、保真度和可持续性。伦理与传播:本研究已获得北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校机构审查委员会批准(IRB #24-3104)。我们将获得所有访谈参与者的口头知情同意,并将知情同意嵌入到员工调查中。研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物、会议报告、利益相关者会议和直接向参与的临床站点传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating social drivers of health screening and management into prenatal care: protocol for a mixed-methods implementation evaluation.

Background: Social drivers of health (SDOH), such as housing stability, food security and access to transportation, profoundly influence both healthcare access and health outcomes. In pregnancy, screening positively for SDOH domains correlates with poorer perinatal outcomes. While the American college of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends screening for SDOH at every routine prenatal visit, many prenatal practices struggle to systematically screen patients for SDOH. This study evaluates the implementation of a universal SDOH screening and management protocol in prenatal care and aims to bridge the gap between the recommendation for universal SDOH screening in prenatal care and its actual integration by evaluating implementation strategies that can serve as a guide for other prenatal care clinics.

Methods and analysis: This multi-site, prospective formative implementation evaluation will assess the integration of standardised SDOH screening and management into prenatal care workflows at four prenatal clinic sites within an academic Obstetrics and Gynaecology department. The study employs a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods approach integrating chart-abstracted patient data, staff surveys, and staff and patient semi-structured interviews, guided by established implementation science frameworks (exploration, preparation, implementation and sustainment, consolidated framework for implementation research and implementation outcomes framework). Key implementation strategies include workflow integration, electronic medical record optimisation, role clarification and comprehensive training. Implementation outcomes to be evaluated include feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity and sustainability.

Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Institutional Review Board (IRB #24-3104). Verbal informed consent will be obtained from all interview participants, and consent will be embedded in staff surveys. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder meetings and directly to participating clinical sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信