对与副肿瘤神经综合征(PNS)相关的自身抗体检测的协调:一项欧洲实验室实践调查。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Matthijs Oyaert, Marco Schreurs, David Goncalves, Dina Patel, Ravishankar Sargur, Carol Stanley, Monica Probst, Marie-Agnès Durey, Jan Damoiseaux, Carolien Bonroy
{"title":"对与副肿瘤神经综合征(PNS)相关的自身抗体检测的协调:一项欧洲实验室实践调查。","authors":"Matthijs Oyaert, Marco Schreurs, David Goncalves, Dina Patel, Ravishankar Sargur, Carol Stanley, Monica Probst, Marie-Agnès Durey, Jan Damoiseaux, Carolien Bonroy","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-1030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Detection of paraneoplastic anti-neuronal antibodies (PNS autoantibodies) aids in diagnosing the particular syndrome and guides the search for an underlying tumor. To identify opportunities for harmonization that could enhance diagnostic value, we assessed variability in autoimmune serological testing for PNS across laboratories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI) developed a questionnaire addressing testing methods, digital tools, interpretation, clinical context, and quality assurance. This was distributed through two external quality assessment (EQA) providers (UK NEQAS and IfQ Lübeck) to clinical labs routinely performing PNS autoantibody assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 139 responding laboratories, 78 % perform both cerebellum indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and line/dot blot assays on serum and cerebrospinal fluid (76 %). Alignment on sample dilution (61 %) and conjugate type (70 %) is variable. Differences in antigen composition and reporting strategies contribute to variability in line/dot blot testing. Digitization is widespread for line/dot blot data (87 %) but limited for cerebellum IIF (31 %). About 53 % use testing algorithms that vary by sample type and requested antibodies. Internal quality control is performed by 89 % (IIF) and 48 % (line/dot blot), mainly using commercial controls. Nearly half (43 %) participate in multiple EQA programs; 46 % (IIF) and 42 % (line/dot blot) have ISO15189 certification, with 20 % planning certification. Positivity rates are low (<6 % in 73 % of labs), indicating low pre-test probability. While only 46 % restrict testing by discipline, most labs access clinical context (84 %) and interact with clinicians (63 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considerable variability exists in PNS autoantibody assay execution, reporting, and quality control. Introducing lab-specific recommendations may harmonize practices and improve diagnostic quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards harmonization of autoantibody detection in relation to paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS): a European Survey on laboratory practices.\",\"authors\":\"Matthijs Oyaert, Marco Schreurs, David Goncalves, Dina Patel, Ravishankar Sargur, Carol Stanley, Monica Probst, Marie-Agnès Durey, Jan Damoiseaux, Carolien Bonroy\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-1030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Detection of paraneoplastic anti-neuronal antibodies (PNS autoantibodies) aids in diagnosing the particular syndrome and guides the search for an underlying tumor. To identify opportunities for harmonization that could enhance diagnostic value, we assessed variability in autoimmune serological testing for PNS across laboratories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI) developed a questionnaire addressing testing methods, digital tools, interpretation, clinical context, and quality assurance. This was distributed through two external quality assessment (EQA) providers (UK NEQAS and IfQ Lübeck) to clinical labs routinely performing PNS autoantibody assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 139 responding laboratories, 78 % perform both cerebellum indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and line/dot blot assays on serum and cerebrospinal fluid (76 %). Alignment on sample dilution (61 %) and conjugate type (70 %) is variable. Differences in antigen composition and reporting strategies contribute to variability in line/dot blot testing. Digitization is widespread for line/dot blot data (87 %) but limited for cerebellum IIF (31 %). About 53 % use testing algorithms that vary by sample type and requested antibodies. Internal quality control is performed by 89 % (IIF) and 48 % (line/dot blot), mainly using commercial controls. Nearly half (43 %) participate in multiple EQA programs; 46 % (IIF) and 42 % (line/dot blot) have ISO15189 certification, with 20 % planning certification. Positivity rates are low (<6 % in 73 % of labs), indicating low pre-test probability. While only 46 % restrict testing by discipline, most labs access clinical context (84 %) and interact with clinicians (63 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considerable variability exists in PNS autoantibody assay execution, reporting, and quality control. Introducing lab-specific recommendations may harmonize practices and improve diagnostic quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-1030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-1030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:检测副肿瘤抗神经元抗体(PNS自身抗体)有助于诊断特定综合征并指导寻找潜在肿瘤。为了确定能够提高诊断价值的统一机会,我们评估了各实验室PNS自身免疫血清学检测的可变性。方法:欧洲自身免疫标准化倡议(EASI)制定了一份调查问卷,涉及检测方法、数字工具、解释、临床背景和质量保证。通过两个外部质量评估(EQA)提供者(UK NEQAS和IfQ l beck)分发给常规进行PNS自身抗体检测的临床实验室。结果:在139个响应的实验室中,78% %同时对血清和脑脊液进行了小脑间接免疫荧光(IIF)和线/点杂交(76 %)。样品稀释度(61 %)和共轭型(70 %)的对准是可变的。抗原组成和报告策略的差异导致了线/点印迹检测的可变性。数字化广泛用于线/点印迹数据(87% %),但仅限于小脑IIF(31% %)。大约53 %使用的测试算法因样品类型和要求的抗体而异。内部质量控制由89% % (IIF)和48% %(线/点印迹)执行,主要使用商业控制。近一半(43% %)参加了多个EQA项目;46个 % (IIF)和42个 %(线/点印迹)通过ISO15189认证,20个 %计划认证。阳性率低(结论:在PNS自身抗体检测执行、报告和质量控制方面存在相当大的可变性。引入特定实验室的建议可以协调实践并提高诊断质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards harmonization of autoantibody detection in relation to paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS): a European Survey on laboratory practices.

Objectives: Detection of paraneoplastic anti-neuronal antibodies (PNS autoantibodies) aids in diagnosing the particular syndrome and guides the search for an underlying tumor. To identify opportunities for harmonization that could enhance diagnostic value, we assessed variability in autoimmune serological testing for PNS across laboratories.

Methods: The European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI) developed a questionnaire addressing testing methods, digital tools, interpretation, clinical context, and quality assurance. This was distributed through two external quality assessment (EQA) providers (UK NEQAS and IfQ Lübeck) to clinical labs routinely performing PNS autoantibody assays.

Results: Among 139 responding laboratories, 78 % perform both cerebellum indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and line/dot blot assays on serum and cerebrospinal fluid (76 %). Alignment on sample dilution (61 %) and conjugate type (70 %) is variable. Differences in antigen composition and reporting strategies contribute to variability in line/dot blot testing. Digitization is widespread for line/dot blot data (87 %) but limited for cerebellum IIF (31 %). About 53 % use testing algorithms that vary by sample type and requested antibodies. Internal quality control is performed by 89 % (IIF) and 48 % (line/dot blot), mainly using commercial controls. Nearly half (43 %) participate in multiple EQA programs; 46 % (IIF) and 42 % (line/dot blot) have ISO15189 certification, with 20 % planning certification. Positivity rates are low (<6 % in 73 % of labs), indicating low pre-test probability. While only 46 % restrict testing by discipline, most labs access clinical context (84 %) and interact with clinicians (63 %).

Conclusions: Considerable variability exists in PNS autoantibody assay execution, reporting, and quality control. Introducing lab-specific recommendations may harmonize practices and improve diagnostic quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信