Andrea Manfrin, Kingyin Lee, Crina Cacou, James Pound, Anthony Harnden, June Raine, Munir Pirmohamed
{"title":"药品和保健产品监管机构对临床试验引入风险比例方法的评估:对2023年9月至2024年8月期间评估的4617份申请的分析。","authors":"Andrea Manfrin, Kingyin Lee, Crina Cacou, James Pound, Anthony Harnden, June Raine, Munir Pirmohamed","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) introduced a risk-proportionate approach to assess clinical trial applications for authorisation in August 2023. This study evaluates the impact of this approach on the timelines for reviewing proposals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on new clinical trial initial submissions and substantial amendments were extracted from the MHRA's clinical trials unit database. The primary endpoint was the number of days for the MHRA's first review of initial applications. The secondary endpoints were the days taken by the sponsor's replies to grounds for nonacceptance, the MHRA's days to issue the final decision and the percentage of reviews within statutory timelines. For substantial amendments, the days for the final decision and the percentage of statutory timelines met were the endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2023 and August 2024, 4617 applications were received, 615 relating to initial clinical trial submissions, while 4002 were substantial amendments. The first review was completed within the statutory timelines for 99% of submissions, with a median of 28 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27-30); 48.5% of sponsors' replies to grounds for nonacceptance met the statutory timelines with no statistically significant difference between the commercial and noncommercial sponsors (median 15 days, IQR 9-22). The final decision from the MHRA was within the nonstatutory timelines (median 15 days, IQR 13-27); 99.9% of the substantial amendments were completed within the statutory timelines (median 31 days, IQR 24-34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MHRA's risk-proportionate approach enabled the Clinical Trials Unit to consistently meet its timelines, confirming its reliability, consistency and predictability while maintaining its priority to protect patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's introduction of a risk-proportionate approach for clinical trials: An analysis of 4617 applications assessed between September 2023 and August 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Manfrin, Kingyin Lee, Crina Cacou, James Pound, Anthony Harnden, June Raine, Munir Pirmohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) introduced a risk-proportionate approach to assess clinical trial applications for authorisation in August 2023. This study evaluates the impact of this approach on the timelines for reviewing proposals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on new clinical trial initial submissions and substantial amendments were extracted from the MHRA's clinical trials unit database. The primary endpoint was the number of days for the MHRA's first review of initial applications. The secondary endpoints were the days taken by the sponsor's replies to grounds for nonacceptance, the MHRA's days to issue the final decision and the percentage of reviews within statutory timelines. For substantial amendments, the days for the final decision and the percentage of statutory timelines met were the endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2023 and August 2024, 4617 applications were received, 615 relating to initial clinical trial submissions, while 4002 were substantial amendments. The first review was completed within the statutory timelines for 99% of submissions, with a median of 28 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27-30); 48.5% of sponsors' replies to grounds for nonacceptance met the statutory timelines with no statistically significant difference between the commercial and noncommercial sponsors (median 15 days, IQR 9-22). The final decision from the MHRA was within the nonstatutory timelines (median 15 days, IQR 13-27); 99.9% of the substantial amendments were completed within the statutory timelines (median 31 days, IQR 24-34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MHRA's risk-proportionate approach enabled the Clinical Trials Unit to consistently meet its timelines, confirming its reliability, consistency and predictability while maintaining its priority to protect patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's introduction of a risk-proportionate approach for clinical trials: An analysis of 4617 applications assessed between September 2023 and August 2024.
Aims: The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) introduced a risk-proportionate approach to assess clinical trial applications for authorisation in August 2023. This study evaluates the impact of this approach on the timelines for reviewing proposals.
Methods: Data on new clinical trial initial submissions and substantial amendments were extracted from the MHRA's clinical trials unit database. The primary endpoint was the number of days for the MHRA's first review of initial applications. The secondary endpoints were the days taken by the sponsor's replies to grounds for nonacceptance, the MHRA's days to issue the final decision and the percentage of reviews within statutory timelines. For substantial amendments, the days for the final decision and the percentage of statutory timelines met were the endpoints.
Results: Between September 2023 and August 2024, 4617 applications were received, 615 relating to initial clinical trial submissions, while 4002 were substantial amendments. The first review was completed within the statutory timelines for 99% of submissions, with a median of 28 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27-30); 48.5% of sponsors' replies to grounds for nonacceptance met the statutory timelines with no statistically significant difference between the commercial and noncommercial sponsors (median 15 days, IQR 9-22). The final decision from the MHRA was within the nonstatutory timelines (median 15 days, IQR 13-27); 99.9% of the substantial amendments were completed within the statutory timelines (median 31 days, IQR 24-34).
Conclusion: The MHRA's risk-proportionate approach enabled the Clinical Trials Unit to consistently meet its timelines, confirming its reliability, consistency and predictability while maintaining its priority to protect patient safety.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.