药品和保健产品监管机构对临床试验引入风险比例方法的评估:对2023年9月至2024年8月期间评估的4617份申请的分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Andrea Manfrin, Kingyin Lee, Crina Cacou, James Pound, Anthony Harnden, June Raine, Munir Pirmohamed
{"title":"药品和保健产品监管机构对临床试验引入风险比例方法的评估:对2023年9月至2024年8月期间评估的4617份申请的分析。","authors":"Andrea Manfrin, Kingyin Lee, Crina Cacou, James Pound, Anthony Harnden, June Raine, Munir Pirmohamed","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) introduced a risk-proportionate approach to assess clinical trial applications for authorisation in August 2023. This study evaluates the impact of this approach on the timelines for reviewing proposals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on new clinical trial initial submissions and substantial amendments were extracted from the MHRA's clinical trials unit database. The primary endpoint was the number of days for the MHRA's first review of initial applications. The secondary endpoints were the days taken by the sponsor's replies to grounds for nonacceptance, the MHRA's days to issue the final decision and the percentage of reviews within statutory timelines. For substantial amendments, the days for the final decision and the percentage of statutory timelines met were the endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2023 and August 2024, 4617 applications were received, 615 relating to initial clinical trial submissions, while 4002 were substantial amendments. The first review was completed within the statutory timelines for 99% of submissions, with a median of 28 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27-30); 48.5% of sponsors' replies to grounds for nonacceptance met the statutory timelines with no statistically significant difference between the commercial and noncommercial sponsors (median 15 days, IQR 9-22). The final decision from the MHRA was within the nonstatutory timelines (median 15 days, IQR 13-27); 99.9% of the substantial amendments were completed within the statutory timelines (median 31 days, IQR 24-34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MHRA's risk-proportionate approach enabled the Clinical Trials Unit to consistently meet its timelines, confirming its reliability, consistency and predictability while maintaining its priority to protect patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's introduction of a risk-proportionate approach for clinical trials: An analysis of 4617 applications assessed between September 2023 and August 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Manfrin, Kingyin Lee, Crina Cacou, James Pound, Anthony Harnden, June Raine, Munir Pirmohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) introduced a risk-proportionate approach to assess clinical trial applications for authorisation in August 2023. This study evaluates the impact of this approach on the timelines for reviewing proposals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on new clinical trial initial submissions and substantial amendments were extracted from the MHRA's clinical trials unit database. The primary endpoint was the number of days for the MHRA's first review of initial applications. The secondary endpoints were the days taken by the sponsor's replies to grounds for nonacceptance, the MHRA's days to issue the final decision and the percentage of reviews within statutory timelines. For substantial amendments, the days for the final decision and the percentage of statutory timelines met were the endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2023 and August 2024, 4617 applications were received, 615 relating to initial clinical trial submissions, while 4002 were substantial amendments. The first review was completed within the statutory timelines for 99% of submissions, with a median of 28 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27-30); 48.5% of sponsors' replies to grounds for nonacceptance met the statutory timelines with no statistically significant difference between the commercial and noncommercial sponsors (median 15 days, IQR 9-22). The final decision from the MHRA was within the nonstatutory timelines (median 15 days, IQR 13-27); 99.9% of the substantial amendments were completed within the statutory timelines (median 31 days, IQR 24-34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MHRA's risk-proportionate approach enabled the Clinical Trials Unit to consistently meet its timelines, confirming its reliability, consistency and predictability while maintaining its priority to protect patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药品和保健产品监管局(MHRA)于2023年8月引入了一种风险比例方法来评估临床试验申请的授权。本研究评估此方法对检讨建议书时间表的影响。方法:从MHRA的临床试验单元数据库中提取新的临床试验初始提交和实质性修订的数据。主要终点是MHRA首次审查初始申请的天数。次要终点是申办者对不接受理由作出答复所需的天数,MHRA发布最终决定的天数以及法定时限内审核的百分比。对于实质性修订,最终决定的天数和法定时限达到的百分比是终点。结果:在2023年9月至2024年8月期间,共收到4617份申请,其中615份涉及初步临床试验申请,4002份为实质性修订申请。99%的提交材料在法定时限内完成了第一次审查,中位数为28天(四分位数范围[IQR] 27-30);48.5%的赞助商对不接受理由的答复符合法定时限,商业和非商业赞助商之间没有统计学上的显著差异(中位数为15天,IQR 9-22)。MHRA的最终决定在非法定时限内(中位数为15天,IQR 13-27);99.9%的重大修订在法定时限内完成(中位数为31天,IQR 24-34)。结论:MHRA的风险比例方法使临床试验部门能够始终如一地满足其时间表,确认其可靠性、一致性和可预测性,同时保持其优先保护患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's introduction of a risk-proportionate approach for clinical trials: An analysis of 4617 applications assessed between September 2023 and August 2024.

Aims: The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) introduced a risk-proportionate approach to assess clinical trial applications for authorisation in August 2023. This study evaluates the impact of this approach on the timelines for reviewing proposals.

Methods: Data on new clinical trial initial submissions and substantial amendments were extracted from the MHRA's clinical trials unit database. The primary endpoint was the number of days for the MHRA's first review of initial applications. The secondary endpoints were the days taken by the sponsor's replies to grounds for nonacceptance, the MHRA's days to issue the final decision and the percentage of reviews within statutory timelines. For substantial amendments, the days for the final decision and the percentage of statutory timelines met were the endpoints.

Results: Between September 2023 and August 2024, 4617 applications were received, 615 relating to initial clinical trial submissions, while 4002 were substantial amendments. The first review was completed within the statutory timelines for 99% of submissions, with a median of 28 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27-30); 48.5% of sponsors' replies to grounds for nonacceptance met the statutory timelines with no statistically significant difference between the commercial and noncommercial sponsors (median 15 days, IQR 9-22). The final decision from the MHRA was within the nonstatutory timelines (median 15 days, IQR 13-27); 99.9% of the substantial amendments were completed within the statutory timelines (median 31 days, IQR 24-34).

Conclusion: The MHRA's risk-proportionate approach enabled the Clinical Trials Unit to consistently meet its timelines, confirming its reliability, consistency and predictability while maintaining its priority to protect patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信