Zhaoqian Xu, Qi Huang, Xinlei Zhang, Song Wang, Yingying Luo, Feng Liu, Linong Ji, Xiantong Zou
{"title":"重新评估肝脂肪和高血糖之间的因果关系。","authors":"Zhaoqian Xu, Qi Huang, Xinlei Zhang, Song Wang, Yingying Luo, Feng Liu, Linong Ji, Xiantong Zou","doi":"10.1111/dom.70178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Given the proposed role of liver fat in diabetes, this study examined its potential causal relationship with glycaemic traits.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from 37 358 individuals was conducted to evaluate the causal effect of liver fat on fasting glucose level, HbA1c level, postprandial glucose level, fasting insulin level, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining drugs that target hepatic steatosis and their effects on glycaemic traits was subsequently performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MR analysis revealed no causal effect of liver fat content on the following glycaemic traits: fasting glucose level (β = -0.006; p = 0.827), HbA1c level (β = -0.009; p = 0.366), postprandial glucose level (β = -0.063; p = 0.257), fasting insulin level (β = 0.010; p = 0.691), and HOMA-IR (β = 0.001; p = 0.965). In 13 RCTs of liver fat-targeted drugs (n = 2482), no significant differences were observed in the changes in fasting blood glucose (SMD: -0.09, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.01) or HbA1c levels (SMD: -0.02, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.07) between drug-treated patients and controls. Meta-regression analysis revealed no statistically significant linear relationship between liver fat reduction and changes in fasting blood glucose or HbA1c levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absence of a causal relationship between hepatic steatosis and glycaemic traits suggests that hyperglycaemia in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease may involve additional mechanisms beyond liver fat accumulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reevaluating the causal link between liver fat and hyperglycaemia.\",\"authors\":\"Zhaoqian Xu, Qi Huang, Xinlei Zhang, Song Wang, Yingying Luo, Feng Liu, Linong Ji, Xiantong Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.70178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Given the proposed role of liver fat in diabetes, this study examined its potential causal relationship with glycaemic traits.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from 37 358 individuals was conducted to evaluate the causal effect of liver fat on fasting glucose level, HbA1c level, postprandial glucose level, fasting insulin level, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining drugs that target hepatic steatosis and their effects on glycaemic traits was subsequently performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MR analysis revealed no causal effect of liver fat content on the following glycaemic traits: fasting glucose level (β = -0.006; p = 0.827), HbA1c level (β = -0.009; p = 0.366), postprandial glucose level (β = -0.063; p = 0.257), fasting insulin level (β = 0.010; p = 0.691), and HOMA-IR (β = 0.001; p = 0.965). In 13 RCTs of liver fat-targeted drugs (n = 2482), no significant differences were observed in the changes in fasting blood glucose (SMD: -0.09, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.01) or HbA1c levels (SMD: -0.02, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.07) between drug-treated patients and controls. Meta-regression analysis revealed no statistically significant linear relationship between liver fat reduction and changes in fasting blood glucose or HbA1c levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absence of a causal relationship between hepatic steatosis and glycaemic traits suggests that hyperglycaemia in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease may involve additional mechanisms beyond liver fat accumulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70178\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:鉴于肝脏脂肪在糖尿病中的作用,本研究探讨了其与血糖特征的潜在因果关系。材料和方法:利用来自37358名个体的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据进行双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以评估肝脏脂肪对空腹血糖水平、HbA1c水平、餐后血糖水平、空腹胰岛素水平和胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)的因果关系。随后进行了一项随机对照试验(RCTs)的荟萃分析,研究了针对肝脂肪变性的药物及其对血糖特征的影响。结果:磁共振分析显示,肝脏脂肪含量对以下血糖指标没有因果关系:空腹血糖水平(β = -0.006, p = 0.827)、糖化血红蛋白水平(β = -0.009, p = 0.366)、餐后血糖水平(β = -0.063, p = 0.257)、空腹胰岛素水平(β = 0.010, p = 0.691)和HOMA-IR (β = 0.001, p = 0.965)。在13项肝脏脂肪靶向药物的随机对照试验(n = 2482)中,药物治疗组与对照组的空腹血糖(SMD: -0.09, 95% CI: -0.18 ~ 0.01)或HbA1c水平(SMD: -0.02, 95% CI: -0.12 ~ 0.07)变化无显著差异。meta回归分析显示,肝脏脂肪减少与空腹血糖或HbA1c水平变化之间无统计学意义的线性关系。结论:肝脏脂肪变性和血糖特征之间缺乏因果关系,这表明代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪变性肝病的高血糖可能涉及肝脏脂肪积累以外的其他机制。
Reevaluating the causal link between liver fat and hyperglycaemia.
Aims: Given the proposed role of liver fat in diabetes, this study examined its potential causal relationship with glycaemic traits.
Materials and methods: A two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from 37 358 individuals was conducted to evaluate the causal effect of liver fat on fasting glucose level, HbA1c level, postprandial glucose level, fasting insulin level, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining drugs that target hepatic steatosis and their effects on glycaemic traits was subsequently performed.
Results: MR analysis revealed no causal effect of liver fat content on the following glycaemic traits: fasting glucose level (β = -0.006; p = 0.827), HbA1c level (β = -0.009; p = 0.366), postprandial glucose level (β = -0.063; p = 0.257), fasting insulin level (β = 0.010; p = 0.691), and HOMA-IR (β = 0.001; p = 0.965). In 13 RCTs of liver fat-targeted drugs (n = 2482), no significant differences were observed in the changes in fasting blood glucose (SMD: -0.09, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.01) or HbA1c levels (SMD: -0.02, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.07) between drug-treated patients and controls. Meta-regression analysis revealed no statistically significant linear relationship between liver fat reduction and changes in fasting blood glucose or HbA1c levels.
Conclusion: The absence of a causal relationship between hepatic steatosis and glycaemic traits suggests that hyperglycaemia in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease may involve additional mechanisms beyond liver fat accumulation.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.