机器学习驱动的城市环境NO2预测与分析及其催化剂还原

IF 3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Balendra V. S. Chauhan, Maureen J. Berg, Kirsty L. Smallbone, Indra Rautela, Suhas Ballal, Kevin P. Wyche
{"title":"机器学习驱动的城市环境NO2预测与分析及其催化剂还原","authors":"Balendra V. S. Chauhan,&nbsp;Maureen J. Berg,&nbsp;Kirsty L. Smallbone,&nbsp;Indra Rautela,&nbsp;Suhas Ballal,&nbsp;Kevin P. Wyche","doi":"10.1007/s11244-025-02161-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study employed machine learning (ML) to predict nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) pollution in Marylebone Road, London a high-traffic urban corridor using historical data from 2015 to 2022 to forecast concentrations for the period January 2023 to January 2025. Four ML models were developed and evaluated: Linear Regression, Random Forest, LightGBM, and an Ensemble Stacking model. These models incorporated meteorological and pollutant data and were assessed using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²). The Ensemble Stacking model outperformed the others, achieving an R² of 0.9723, MAE of 3.91 µg/m³, and RMSE of 6.25 µg/m³. In comparison, the Linear Regression model showed the lowest performance (R² = 0.8307, MAE = 11.55, RMSE = 15.45), while Random Forest (R² = 0.9232) and LightGBM (R² = 0.9719) demonstrated intermediate accuracy. The best-performing ensemble model was further used to simulate NO₂ trends with and without titanium dioxide (TiO₂) catalyst intervention, assuming a 28% NO₂ reduction. Temporal analysis revealed that NO, NO₂, and NOₓ concentrations peaked during colder months (November–January) and weekdays. Correlation analysis showed a weak negative relationship between NO₂ and ozone (O₃) (R² = 0.26), moderate positive correlations with black carbon (BC) (R² = 0.597) and sulfur dioxide (SO₂) (R² = 0.654), and a very weak positive correlation with particulate matter (PM2.5) (R² = 0.143). The study concludes that ensemble stacked ML models are effective for predicting NO₂ concentrations and that TiO₂ nanocatalyst interventions hold promise for reducing NO₂, BC, and SO₂ levels in urban environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":801,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Catalysis","volume":"68 18-19","pages":"2089 - 2108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11244-025-02161-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Driven Prediction and Analysis of NO2 and its Catalyst Based Reduction in Urban Environments\",\"authors\":\"Balendra V. S. Chauhan,&nbsp;Maureen J. Berg,&nbsp;Kirsty L. Smallbone,&nbsp;Indra Rautela,&nbsp;Suhas Ballal,&nbsp;Kevin P. Wyche\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11244-025-02161-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study employed machine learning (ML) to predict nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) pollution in Marylebone Road, London a high-traffic urban corridor using historical data from 2015 to 2022 to forecast concentrations for the period January 2023 to January 2025. Four ML models were developed and evaluated: Linear Regression, Random Forest, LightGBM, and an Ensemble Stacking model. These models incorporated meteorological and pollutant data and were assessed using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²). The Ensemble Stacking model outperformed the others, achieving an R² of 0.9723, MAE of 3.91 µg/m³, and RMSE of 6.25 µg/m³. In comparison, the Linear Regression model showed the lowest performance (R² = 0.8307, MAE = 11.55, RMSE = 15.45), while Random Forest (R² = 0.9232) and LightGBM (R² = 0.9719) demonstrated intermediate accuracy. The best-performing ensemble model was further used to simulate NO₂ trends with and without titanium dioxide (TiO₂) catalyst intervention, assuming a 28% NO₂ reduction. Temporal analysis revealed that NO, NO₂, and NOₓ concentrations peaked during colder months (November–January) and weekdays. Correlation analysis showed a weak negative relationship between NO₂ and ozone (O₃) (R² = 0.26), moderate positive correlations with black carbon (BC) (R² = 0.597) and sulfur dioxide (SO₂) (R² = 0.654), and a very weak positive correlation with particulate matter (PM2.5) (R² = 0.143). The study concludes that ensemble stacked ML models are effective for predicting NO₂ concentrations and that TiO₂ nanocatalyst interventions hold promise for reducing NO₂, BC, and SO₂ levels in urban environments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Catalysis\",\"volume\":\"68 18-19\",\"pages\":\"2089 - 2108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11244-025-02161-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Catalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11244-025-02161-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Catalysis","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11244-025-02161-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用机器学习(ML)预测伦敦Marylebone路(一个高流量的城市走廊)的二氧化氮(NO₂)污染,使用2015年至2022年的历史数据预测2023年1月至2025年1月期间的浓度。开发并评估了四种ML模型:线性回归、随机森林、LightGBM和集成堆叠模型。这些模型纳入了气象和污染物数据,并使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和R平方(R²)进行评估。集成堆叠模型优于其他模型,R²为0.9723,MAE为3.91µg/m³,RMSE为6.25µg/m³。相比之下,线性回归模型的准确率最低(R²= 0.8307,MAE = 11.55, RMSE = 15.45),而随机森林模型(R²= 0.9232)和LightGBM模型(R²= 0.9719)的准确率为中等。在假设NO₂减少28%的情况下,使用性能最好的集合模型进一步模拟了有和没有二氧化钛(TiO₂)催化剂干预的NO₂趋势。时间分析表明,NO、NO 2和NOₓ浓度在较冷的月份(11 - 1月)和工作日达到峰值。相关分析表明,NO₂与臭氧(O₃)呈弱负相关(R²= 0.26),与黑碳(BC) (R²= 0.597)和二氧化硫(SO₂)(R²= 0.654)呈中等正相关(R²= 0.143),与颗粒物(PM2.5)呈极弱正相关(R²= 0.143)。该研究得出结论,集成堆叠ML模型可有效预测NO₂浓度,而TiO₂纳米催化剂干预有望降低城市环境中的NO₂、BC和SO₂水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning Driven Prediction and Analysis of NO2 and its Catalyst Based Reduction in Urban Environments

This study employed machine learning (ML) to predict nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) pollution in Marylebone Road, London a high-traffic urban corridor using historical data from 2015 to 2022 to forecast concentrations for the period January 2023 to January 2025. Four ML models were developed and evaluated: Linear Regression, Random Forest, LightGBM, and an Ensemble Stacking model. These models incorporated meteorological and pollutant data and were assessed using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²). The Ensemble Stacking model outperformed the others, achieving an R² of 0.9723, MAE of 3.91 µg/m³, and RMSE of 6.25 µg/m³. In comparison, the Linear Regression model showed the lowest performance (R² = 0.8307, MAE = 11.55, RMSE = 15.45), while Random Forest (R² = 0.9232) and LightGBM (R² = 0.9719) demonstrated intermediate accuracy. The best-performing ensemble model was further used to simulate NO₂ trends with and without titanium dioxide (TiO₂) catalyst intervention, assuming a 28% NO₂ reduction. Temporal analysis revealed that NO, NO₂, and NOₓ concentrations peaked during colder months (November–January) and weekdays. Correlation analysis showed a weak negative relationship between NO₂ and ozone (O₃) (R² = 0.26), moderate positive correlations with black carbon (BC) (R² = 0.597) and sulfur dioxide (SO₂) (R² = 0.654), and a very weak positive correlation with particulate matter (PM2.5) (R² = 0.143). The study concludes that ensemble stacked ML models are effective for predicting NO₂ concentrations and that TiO₂ nanocatalyst interventions hold promise for reducing NO₂, BC, and SO₂ levels in urban environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Catalysis
Topics in Catalysis 化学-物理化学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Topics in Catalysis publishes topical collections in all fields of catalysis which are composed only of invited articles from leading authors. The journal documents today’s emerging and critical trends in all branches of catalysis. Each themed issue is organized by renowned Guest Editors in collaboration with the Editors-in-Chief. Proposals for new topics are welcome and should be submitted directly to the Editors-in-Chief. The publication of individual uninvited original research articles can be sent to our sister journal Catalysis Letters. This journal aims for rapid publication of high-impact original research articles in all fields of both applied and theoretical catalysis, including heterogeneous, homogeneous and biocatalysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信