Ravi Ojha,Emilia Timin,Leonora Szirovicza,Wujun Xu,Jussi Hepojoki
{"title":"系统比较内部制备的转染试剂在mRNA或DNA传递到广泛的培养细胞中的作用。","authors":"Ravi Ojha,Emilia Timin,Leonora Szirovicza,Wujun Xu,Jussi Hepojoki","doi":"10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transfection is a fundamental molecular biology technique, enabling gene editing, protein expression, and vaccine development. However, transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity vary widely between reagent and cell type, necessitating optimization. Commercial reagents such as Lipofectamine 2000 and FuGENE HD are widely used for their high efficiency, but they are expensive and the efficiency can associate with cytotoxicity. In-house alternatives such as linear polyethylenimine (PEI; 25 kDa and 40 kDa) and cationic lipids-1,2-di-O-octadecenyl-3-trimethylammonium propane (DOTMA) and 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP)-combined with dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) offer cost-effective options, but their performance across diverse cell types and nucleic acid type (RNA or DNA) remains insufficiently characterized. This motivated us to systematically evaluate transfection efficiency, cytotoxicity, and complex stability of these in-house reagents (DOPE:DOTAP and DOPE:DOTMA tested at molar ratios of 0.5:1, 1:1, and 2:1) over a broad range of reagent to nucleic acid ratios, using plasmid DNA and mRNA encoding mCherry. We performed transfections across 14 cell lines derived from human, monkey, frog, snake, and rodent tissues. We utilized automated fluorescence microscopy for quantifying transfection efficiency, luminescence-based viability assays for cytotoxicity, and studied complex stability during storage at 4°C (0, 4, and 24 hours) through transfection. Results revealed cell line-dependent differences in transfection efficiency, and showed in-house cationic lipid formulations to have a high mRNA transfection efficiency with low cytotoxicity. Lipofectamine 2000 and PEI 40k formed the most stable DNA complexes, but with higher cytotoxicity. This study provides a comprehensive reference for selecting customizable, cost-effective transfection reagents for specific cell and nucleic acid types.","PeriodicalId":15140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Chemistry","volume":"3 1","pages":"110742"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic comparison of in-house prepared transfection reagents in the delivery of mRNA or DNA to a wide range of cultured cells.\",\"authors\":\"Ravi Ojha,Emilia Timin,Leonora Szirovicza,Wujun Xu,Jussi Hepojoki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transfection is a fundamental molecular biology technique, enabling gene editing, protein expression, and vaccine development. However, transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity vary widely between reagent and cell type, necessitating optimization. Commercial reagents such as Lipofectamine 2000 and FuGENE HD are widely used for their high efficiency, but they are expensive and the efficiency can associate with cytotoxicity. In-house alternatives such as linear polyethylenimine (PEI; 25 kDa and 40 kDa) and cationic lipids-1,2-di-O-octadecenyl-3-trimethylammonium propane (DOTMA) and 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP)-combined with dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) offer cost-effective options, but their performance across diverse cell types and nucleic acid type (RNA or DNA) remains insufficiently characterized. This motivated us to systematically evaluate transfection efficiency, cytotoxicity, and complex stability of these in-house reagents (DOPE:DOTAP and DOPE:DOTMA tested at molar ratios of 0.5:1, 1:1, and 2:1) over a broad range of reagent to nucleic acid ratios, using plasmid DNA and mRNA encoding mCherry. We performed transfections across 14 cell lines derived from human, monkey, frog, snake, and rodent tissues. We utilized automated fluorescence microscopy for quantifying transfection efficiency, luminescence-based viability assays for cytotoxicity, and studied complex stability during storage at 4°C (0, 4, and 24 hours) through transfection. Results revealed cell line-dependent differences in transfection efficiency, and showed in-house cationic lipid formulations to have a high mRNA transfection efficiency with low cytotoxicity. Lipofectamine 2000 and PEI 40k formed the most stable DNA complexes, but with higher cytotoxicity. This study provides a comprehensive reference for selecting customizable, cost-effective transfection reagents for specific cell and nucleic acid types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biological Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"110742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biological Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110742\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic comparison of in-house prepared transfection reagents in the delivery of mRNA or DNA to a wide range of cultured cells.
Transfection is a fundamental molecular biology technique, enabling gene editing, protein expression, and vaccine development. However, transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity vary widely between reagent and cell type, necessitating optimization. Commercial reagents such as Lipofectamine 2000 and FuGENE HD are widely used for their high efficiency, but they are expensive and the efficiency can associate with cytotoxicity. In-house alternatives such as linear polyethylenimine (PEI; 25 kDa and 40 kDa) and cationic lipids-1,2-di-O-octadecenyl-3-trimethylammonium propane (DOTMA) and 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP)-combined with dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) offer cost-effective options, but their performance across diverse cell types and nucleic acid type (RNA or DNA) remains insufficiently characterized. This motivated us to systematically evaluate transfection efficiency, cytotoxicity, and complex stability of these in-house reagents (DOPE:DOTAP and DOPE:DOTMA tested at molar ratios of 0.5:1, 1:1, and 2:1) over a broad range of reagent to nucleic acid ratios, using plasmid DNA and mRNA encoding mCherry. We performed transfections across 14 cell lines derived from human, monkey, frog, snake, and rodent tissues. We utilized automated fluorescence microscopy for quantifying transfection efficiency, luminescence-based viability assays for cytotoxicity, and studied complex stability during storage at 4°C (0, 4, and 24 hours) through transfection. Results revealed cell line-dependent differences in transfection efficiency, and showed in-house cationic lipid formulations to have a high mRNA transfection efficiency with low cytotoxicity. Lipofectamine 2000 and PEI 40k formed the most stable DNA complexes, but with higher cytotoxicity. This study provides a comprehensive reference for selecting customizable, cost-effective transfection reagents for specific cell and nucleic acid types.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biological Chemistry welcomes high-quality science that seeks to elucidate the molecular and cellular basis of biological processes. Papers published in JBC can therefore fall under the umbrellas of not only biological chemistry, chemical biology, or biochemistry, but also allied disciplines such as biophysics, systems biology, RNA biology, immunology, microbiology, neurobiology, epigenetics, computational biology, ’omics, and many more. The outcome of our focus on papers that contribute novel and important mechanistic insights, rather than on a particular topic area, is that JBC is truly a melting pot for scientists across disciplines. In addition, JBC welcomes papers that describe methods that will help scientists push their biochemical inquiries forward and resources that will be of use to the research community.