基准单细胞方法的现状和新出现的挑战。

IF 7.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Yue Cao, Lijia Yu, Marni Torkel, Sanghyun Kim, Yingxin Lin, Pengyi Yang, Terence P Speed, Shila Ghazanfar, Jean Yee Hwa Yang
{"title":"基准单细胞方法的现状和新出现的挑战。","authors":"Yue Cao, Lijia Yu, Marni Torkel, Sanghyun Kim, Yingxin Lin, Pengyi Yang, Terence P Speed, Shila Ghazanfar, Jean Yee Hwa Yang","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbaf380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rapid development of computational methods for single-cell sequencing data, benchmarking serves as a valuable resource. As the number of benchmarking studies surges, it is timely to assess the current state of the field. We conducted a systematic literature search and assessed 282 papers, including all 130 benchmark-only papers from the search and an additional 152 method development papers containing benchmarking. This collective effort provides the most comprehensive quantitative summary of the current landscape of single-cell benchmarking studies. We examine performances across nine broad categories, including often ignored aspects such as role of datasets, robustness of methods and downstream evaluation. Our analysis highlights challenges such as how to effectively combine knowledge across multiple benchmarking studies and in what ways can the community recognize the risk and prevent benchmarking fatigue. This paper highlights the importance of adopting a community-led research paradigm to tackle these challenges and establish best practice standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current landscape and emerging challenges of benchmarking single-cell methods.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Cao, Lijia Yu, Marni Torkel, Sanghyun Kim, Yingxin Lin, Pengyi Yang, Terence P Speed, Shila Ghazanfar, Jean Yee Hwa Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bib/bbaf380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the rapid development of computational methods for single-cell sequencing data, benchmarking serves as a valuable resource. As the number of benchmarking studies surges, it is timely to assess the current state of the field. We conducted a systematic literature search and assessed 282 papers, including all 130 benchmark-only papers from the search and an additional 152 method development papers containing benchmarking. This collective effort provides the most comprehensive quantitative summary of the current landscape of single-cell benchmarking studies. We examine performances across nine broad categories, including often ignored aspects such as role of datasets, robustness of methods and downstream evaluation. Our analysis highlights challenges such as how to effectively combine knowledge across multiple benchmarking studies and in what ways can the community recognize the risk and prevent benchmarking fatigue. This paper highlights the importance of adopting a community-led research paradigm to tackle these challenges and establish best practice standards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Briefings in bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Briefings in bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf380\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着单细胞测序数据计算方法的快速发展,基准测试成为一种宝贵的资源。随着基准研究数量的激增,对该领域的现状进行评估是及时的。我们进行了系统的文献检索,并评估了282篇论文,包括检索到的全部130篇仅包含基准的论文和另外152篇包含基准的方法开发论文。这一集体努力提供了单细胞基准研究的当前景观最全面的定量总结。我们研究了九个大类的性能,包括经常被忽视的方面,如数据集的作用、方法的稳健性和下游评估。我们的分析突出了挑战,例如如何有效地结合多个基准研究的知识,以及社区如何认识到风险并防止基准疲劳。本文强调了采用社区主导的研究范式来解决这些挑战和建立最佳实践标准的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The current landscape and emerging challenges of benchmarking single-cell methods.

With the rapid development of computational methods for single-cell sequencing data, benchmarking serves as a valuable resource. As the number of benchmarking studies surges, it is timely to assess the current state of the field. We conducted a systematic literature search and assessed 282 papers, including all 130 benchmark-only papers from the search and an additional 152 method development papers containing benchmarking. This collective effort provides the most comprehensive quantitative summary of the current landscape of single-cell benchmarking studies. We examine performances across nine broad categories, including often ignored aspects such as role of datasets, robustness of methods and downstream evaluation. Our analysis highlights challenges such as how to effectively combine knowledge across multiple benchmarking studies and in what ways can the community recognize the risk and prevent benchmarking fatigue. This paper highlights the importance of adopting a community-led research paradigm to tackle these challenges and establish best practice standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信