CASP16中药物蛋白-配体位姿和亲和力预测的评估。

IF 2.8 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Michael K Gilson, Jerome Eberhardt, Peter Škrinjar, Janani Durairaj, Xavier Robin, Andriy Kryshtafovych
{"title":"CASP16中药物蛋白-配体位姿和亲和力预测的评估。","authors":"Michael K Gilson, Jerome Eberhardt, Peter Škrinjar, Janani Durairaj, Xavier Robin, Andriy Kryshtafovych","doi":"10.1002/prot.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The protein-ligand component of the 16th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP16) challenged participants to predict both binding poses and affinities of small molecules to protein targets, with a focus on drug-like compounds from pharmaceutical discovery projects. Thirty research groups submitted predictions for 229 protein-ligand pose targets and 140 affinity targets across five protein systems. Among the submitted predictions, template-based pose-prediction methods did particularly well, with the best groups achieving mean LDDT-PLI values of 0.69 (scale of 0-1 with 1 best). For comparison, we also ran a set of automated baseline pose-prediction methods, including ones using deep neural networks. Of these, AlphaFold 3 did particularly well, with a mean LDDT-PLI of 0.8, thus outscoring the best CASP16 predictor. The CASP affinity predictions showed modest correlation with experimental data (maximum Kendall's τ = 0.42), well below the theoretical maximum possible given experimental uncertainty (~0.73). As seen in prior challenges, providing experimental structures did not improve affinity predictions in the second stage of the challenge, suggesting that the scoring functions used here are a key limiting factor. Overall, the accuracy achieved by CASP participants is similar to that observed in the prior Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) blinded prediction challenges. The present results highlight the progress and persistent challenges in computational protein-ligand modeling and provide valuable benchmarks for the field of computer-aided drug design.</p>","PeriodicalId":56271,"journal":{"name":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Pharmaceutical Protein-Ligand Pose and Affinity Predictions in CASP16.\",\"authors\":\"Michael K Gilson, Jerome Eberhardt, Peter Škrinjar, Janani Durairaj, Xavier Robin, Andriy Kryshtafovych\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prot.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The protein-ligand component of the 16th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP16) challenged participants to predict both binding poses and affinities of small molecules to protein targets, with a focus on drug-like compounds from pharmaceutical discovery projects. Thirty research groups submitted predictions for 229 protein-ligand pose targets and 140 affinity targets across five protein systems. Among the submitted predictions, template-based pose-prediction methods did particularly well, with the best groups achieving mean LDDT-PLI values of 0.69 (scale of 0-1 with 1 best). For comparison, we also ran a set of automated baseline pose-prediction methods, including ones using deep neural networks. Of these, AlphaFold 3 did particularly well, with a mean LDDT-PLI of 0.8, thus outscoring the best CASP16 predictor. The CASP affinity predictions showed modest correlation with experimental data (maximum Kendall's τ = 0.42), well below the theoretical maximum possible given experimental uncertainty (~0.73). As seen in prior challenges, providing experimental structures did not improve affinity predictions in the second stage of the challenge, suggesting that the scoring functions used here are a key limiting factor. Overall, the accuracy achieved by CASP participants is similar to that observed in the prior Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) blinded prediction challenges. The present results highlight the progress and persistent challenges in computational protein-ligand modeling and provide valuable benchmarks for the field of computer-aided drug design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第16届结构预测关键评估(CASP16)的蛋白质配体组分要求参与者预测小分子与蛋白质靶标的结合姿态和亲和力,重点是药物发现项目中的类药物化合物。30个研究小组提交了对5种蛋白质系统中229种蛋白质配体姿势靶标和140种亲和靶标的预测。在提交的预测中,基于模板的姿势预测方法做得特别好,最佳组的平均LDDT-PLI值为0.69(0-1,1最佳)。为了比较,我们还运行了一组自动基线姿势预测方法,包括使用深度神经网络的方法。其中,AlphaFold 3表现特别好,平均LDDT-PLI为0.8,因此超过了最好的CASP16预测器。CASP亲和预测与实验数据显示出适度的相关性(最大肯德尔τ = 0.42),远低于给定实验不确定性的理论最大值(~0.73)。正如在之前的挑战中所看到的,在挑战的第二阶段,提供实验结构并没有提高亲和预测,这表明这里使用的评分函数是一个关键的限制因素。总体而言,CASP参与者获得的准确性与先前药物设计数据资源(D3R)盲法预测挑战中观察到的准确性相似。目前的结果突出了计算蛋白质配体建模的进展和持续的挑战,并为计算机辅助药物设计领域提供了有价值的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Pharmaceutical Protein-Ligand Pose and Affinity Predictions in CASP16.

The protein-ligand component of the 16th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP16) challenged participants to predict both binding poses and affinities of small molecules to protein targets, with a focus on drug-like compounds from pharmaceutical discovery projects. Thirty research groups submitted predictions for 229 protein-ligand pose targets and 140 affinity targets across five protein systems. Among the submitted predictions, template-based pose-prediction methods did particularly well, with the best groups achieving mean LDDT-PLI values of 0.69 (scale of 0-1 with 1 best). For comparison, we also ran a set of automated baseline pose-prediction methods, including ones using deep neural networks. Of these, AlphaFold 3 did particularly well, with a mean LDDT-PLI of 0.8, thus outscoring the best CASP16 predictor. The CASP affinity predictions showed modest correlation with experimental data (maximum Kendall's τ = 0.42), well below the theoretical maximum possible given experimental uncertainty (~0.73). As seen in prior challenges, providing experimental structures did not improve affinity predictions in the second stage of the challenge, suggesting that the scoring functions used here are a key limiting factor. Overall, the accuracy achieved by CASP participants is similar to that observed in the prior Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) blinded prediction challenges. The present results highlight the progress and persistent challenges in computational protein-ligand modeling and provide valuable benchmarks for the field of computer-aided drug design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PROTEINS : Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics publishes original reports of significant experimental and analytic research in all areas of protein research: structure, function, computation, genetics, and design. The journal encourages reports that present new experimental or computational approaches for interpreting and understanding data from biophysical chemistry, structural studies of proteins and macromolecular assemblies, alterations of protein structure and function engineered through techniques of molecular biology and genetics, functional analyses under physiologic conditions, as well as the interactions of proteins with receptors, nucleic acids, or other specific ligands or substrates. Research in protein and peptide biochemistry directed toward synthesizing or characterizing molecules that simulate aspects of the activity of proteins, or that act as inhibitors of protein function, is also within the scope of PROTEINS. In addition to full-length reports, short communications (usually not more than 4 printed pages) and prediction reports are welcome. Reviews are typically by invitation; authors are encouraged to submit proposed topics for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信