{"title":"心理学家在学术健康环境中政策参与的独特技能。","authors":"Amber A Hewitt","doi":"10.1007/s10880-025-10098-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychologists working in medical and academic health settings bring unique skills that make them well-suited for policy advocacy. Their training in trust-building, translating evidence, and understanding context can be applied to influence policies that impact access, quality, and equity in healthcare. This article explains how clinical and counseling skills align with policy engagement and shows their relevance through examples such as Medicaid reform, telehealth parity, and racial equity impact assessments. It introduces conceptual frameworks and practical strategies to demonstrate how psychologists can participate in coalition building, communication, and policy evaluation. Training recommendations emphasize the importance of incorporating advocacy skills into graduate programs, offering mentorship, and providing ongoing professional development to equip psychologists for leadership in evolving healthcare systems. Advocacy is presented not just as a supplement to practice, but as a natural part of psychologists' professional identity. By embedding advocacy into education and practice, psychologists can promote health equity and help ensure policies are based on both scientific evidence and lived experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychologists' Unique Skills for Policy Engagement in Academic Health Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Amber A Hewitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10880-025-10098-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Psychologists working in medical and academic health settings bring unique skills that make them well-suited for policy advocacy. Their training in trust-building, translating evidence, and understanding context can be applied to influence policies that impact access, quality, and equity in healthcare. This article explains how clinical and counseling skills align with policy engagement and shows their relevance through examples such as Medicaid reform, telehealth parity, and racial equity impact assessments. It introduces conceptual frameworks and practical strategies to demonstrate how psychologists can participate in coalition building, communication, and policy evaluation. Training recommendations emphasize the importance of incorporating advocacy skills into graduate programs, offering mentorship, and providing ongoing professional development to equip psychologists for leadership in evolving healthcare systems. Advocacy is presented not just as a supplement to practice, but as a natural part of psychologists' professional identity. By embedding advocacy into education and practice, psychologists can promote health equity and help ensure policies are based on both scientific evidence and lived experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10098-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10098-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychologists' Unique Skills for Policy Engagement in Academic Health Settings.
Psychologists working in medical and academic health settings bring unique skills that make them well-suited for policy advocacy. Their training in trust-building, translating evidence, and understanding context can be applied to influence policies that impact access, quality, and equity in healthcare. This article explains how clinical and counseling skills align with policy engagement and shows their relevance through examples such as Medicaid reform, telehealth parity, and racial equity impact assessments. It introduces conceptual frameworks and practical strategies to demonstrate how psychologists can participate in coalition building, communication, and policy evaluation. Training recommendations emphasize the importance of incorporating advocacy skills into graduate programs, offering mentorship, and providing ongoing professional development to equip psychologists for leadership in evolving healthcare systems. Advocacy is presented not just as a supplement to practice, but as a natural part of psychologists' professional identity. By embedding advocacy into education and practice, psychologists can promote health equity and help ensure policies are based on both scientific evidence and lived experience.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.