考虑农村社区和COVID-19的创伤医院网络扩展随机规划模型

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Eduardo Pérez, Alakshendra Joshi, Sabhasachi Saha, Francis A Méndez-Mediavilla
{"title":"考虑农村社区和COVID-19的创伤医院网络扩展随机规划模型","authors":"Eduardo Pérez, Alakshendra Joshi, Sabhasachi Saha, Francis A Méndez-Mediavilla","doi":"10.1007/s10729-025-09719-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trauma care services are a vital part of all healthcare-based networks as timely accessibility is important for citizens. Trauma care access is even more relevant when unexpected events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, overload the capacity of the hospitals. Research literature has highlighted that access to trauma care is not even for all populations, especially when comparing rural and urban groups. Traditionally, the focus in trauma systems was on the designation and verification of individual hospitals as trauma centers, rather than on the overall configuration of the system. Recognition of the benefits of an inclusive trauma system has precipitated a more integrated approach. The optimal geographic configuration of trauma care centers is key to maximizing accessibility while promoting the efficient use of resources. This research reports on the development of a two-stage stochastic optimization model for geospatial expansion of a trauma network in a delimited area. The stochastic optimization model recommends the siting of new trauma care centers according to the geographic distribution of the injured population. The model has the potential to benefit both patients and institutions, by facilitating prompt access and promoting the efficient use of resources. The findings indicate that the model significantly improves trauma care coverage, particularly in rural counties, thereby enhancing equitable access to critical healthcare services.</p>","PeriodicalId":12903,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A stochastic programming model for trauma hospital network expansion considering rural communities and COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Pérez, Alakshendra Joshi, Sabhasachi Saha, Francis A Méndez-Mediavilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10729-025-09719-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Trauma care services are a vital part of all healthcare-based networks as timely accessibility is important for citizens. Trauma care access is even more relevant when unexpected events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, overload the capacity of the hospitals. Research literature has highlighted that access to trauma care is not even for all populations, especially when comparing rural and urban groups. Traditionally, the focus in trauma systems was on the designation and verification of individual hospitals as trauma centers, rather than on the overall configuration of the system. Recognition of the benefits of an inclusive trauma system has precipitated a more integrated approach. The optimal geographic configuration of trauma care centers is key to maximizing accessibility while promoting the efficient use of resources. This research reports on the development of a two-stage stochastic optimization model for geospatial expansion of a trauma network in a delimited area. The stochastic optimization model recommends the siting of new trauma care centers according to the geographic distribution of the injured population. The model has the potential to benefit both patients and institutions, by facilitating prompt access and promoting the efficient use of resources. The findings indicate that the model significantly improves trauma care coverage, particularly in rural counties, thereby enhancing equitable access to critical healthcare services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-025-09719-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-025-09719-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤护理服务是所有医疗保健网络的重要组成部分,因为及时获得对公民很重要。当COVID-19大流行等意外事件使医院的能力超负荷时,获得创伤护理就更加重要了。研究文献强调,并不是所有人群都能获得创伤护理,尤其是在比较农村和城市人群时。传统上,创伤系统的重点是指定和验证个别医院作为创伤中心,而不是系统的整体配置。认识到包容性创伤系统的好处,促成了一种更综合的方法。创伤护理中心的最佳地理配置是最大限度地提高可达性的关键,同时促进资源的有效利用。本研究报告了一个两阶段的随机优化模型的发展创伤网络的地理空间扩展在划定的区域。随机优化模型根据受伤人群的地理分布推荐新的创伤护理中心的选址。这种模式有可能使患者和医疗机构都受益,因为它促进了及时获取和资源的有效利用。研究结果表明,该模式显著提高了创伤护理覆盖面,特别是在农村县,从而提高了获得关键医疗服务的公平机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A stochastic programming model for trauma hospital network expansion considering rural communities and COVID-19.

Trauma care services are a vital part of all healthcare-based networks as timely accessibility is important for citizens. Trauma care access is even more relevant when unexpected events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, overload the capacity of the hospitals. Research literature has highlighted that access to trauma care is not even for all populations, especially when comparing rural and urban groups. Traditionally, the focus in trauma systems was on the designation and verification of individual hospitals as trauma centers, rather than on the overall configuration of the system. Recognition of the benefits of an inclusive trauma system has precipitated a more integrated approach. The optimal geographic configuration of trauma care centers is key to maximizing accessibility while promoting the efficient use of resources. This research reports on the development of a two-stage stochastic optimization model for geospatial expansion of a trauma network in a delimited area. The stochastic optimization model recommends the siting of new trauma care centers according to the geographic distribution of the injured population. The model has the potential to benefit both patients and institutions, by facilitating prompt access and promoting the efficient use of resources. The findings indicate that the model significantly improves trauma care coverage, particularly in rural counties, thereby enhancing equitable access to critical healthcare services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Science
Health Care Management Science HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Science publishes papers dealing with health care delivery, health care management, and health care policy. Papers should have a decision focus and make use of quantitative methods including management science, operations research, analytics, machine learning, and other emerging areas. Articles must clearly articulate the relevance and the realized or potential impact of the work. Applied research will be considered and is of particular interest if there is evidence that it was implemented or informed a decision-making process. Papers describing routine applications of known methods are discouraged. Authors are encouraged to disclose all data and analyses thereof, and to provide computational code when appropriate. Editorial statements for the individual departments are provided below. Health Care Analytics Departmental Editors: Margrét Bjarnadóttir, University of Maryland Nan Kong, Purdue University With the explosion in computing power and available data, we have seen fast changes in the analytics applied in the healthcare space. The Health Care Analytics department welcomes papers applying a broad range of analytical approaches, including those rooted in machine learning, survival analysis, and complex event analysis, that allow healthcare professionals to find opportunities for improvement in health system management, patient engagement, spending, and diagnosis. We especially encourage papers that combine predictive and prescriptive analytics to improve decision making and health care outcomes. The contribution of papers can be across multiple dimensions including new methodology, novel modeling techniques and health care through real-world cohort studies. Papers that are methodologically focused need in addition to show practical relevance. Similarly papers that are application focused should clearly demonstrate improvements over the status quo and available approaches by applying rigorous analytics. Health Care Operations Management Departmental Editors: Nilay Tanik Argon, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Bob Batt, University of Wisconsin The department invites high-quality papers on the design, control, and analysis of operations at healthcare systems. We seek papers on classical operations management issues (such as scheduling, routing, queuing, transportation, patient flow, and quality) as well as non-traditional problems driven by everchanging healthcare practice. Empirical, experimental, and analytical (model based) methodologies are all welcome. Papers may draw theory from across disciplines, and should provide insight into improving operations from the perspective of patients, service providers, organizations (municipal/government/industry), and/or society. Health Care Management Science Practice Departmental Editor: Vikram Tiwari, Vanderbilt University Medical Center The department seeks research from academicians and practitioners that highlights Management Science based solutions directly relevant to the practice of healthcare. Relevance is judged by the impact on practice, as well as the degree to which researchers engaged with practitioners in understanding the problem context and in developing the solution. Validity, that is, the extent to which the results presented do or would apply in practice is a key evaluation criterion. In addition to meeting the journal’s standards of originality and substantial contribution to knowledge creation, research that can be replicated in other organizations is encouraged. Papers describing unsuccessful applied research projects may be considered if there are generalizable learning points addressing why the project was unsuccessful. Health Care Productivity Analysis Departmental Editor: Jonas Schreyögg, University of Hamburg The department invites papers with rigorous methods and significant impact for policy and practice. Papers typically apply theory and techniques to measuring productivity in health care organizations and systems. The journal welcomes state-of-the-art parametric as well as non-parametric techniques such as data envelopment analysis, stochastic frontier analysis or partial frontier analysis. The contribution of papers can be manifold including new methodology, novel combination of existing methods or application of existing methods to new contexts. Empirical papers should produce results generalizable beyond a selected set of health care organizations. All papers should include a section on implications for management or policy to enhance productivity. Public Health Policy and Medical Decision Making Departmental Editors: Ebru Bish, University of Alabama Julie L. Higle, University of Southern California The department invites high quality papers that use data-driven methods to address important problems that arise in public health policy and medical decision-making domains. We welcome submissions that develop and apply mathematical and computational models in support of data-driven and model-based analyses for these problems. The Public Health Policy and Medical Decision-Making Department is particularly interested in papers that: Study high-impact problems involving health policy, treatment planning and design, and clinical applications; Develop original data-driven models, including those that integrate disease modeling with screening and/or treatment guidelines; Use model-based analyses as decision making-tools to identify optimal solutions, insights, recommendations. Articles must clearly articulate the relevance of the work to decision and/or policy makers and the potential impact on patients and/or society. Papers will include articulated contributions within the methodological domain, which may include modeling, analytical, or computational methodologies. Emerging Topics Departmental Editor: Alec Morton, University of Strathclyde Emerging Topics will handle papers which use innovative quantitative methods to shed light on frontier issues in healthcare management and policy. Such papers may deal with analytic challenges arising from novel health technologies or new organizational forms. Papers falling under this department may also deal with the analysis of new forms of data which are increasingly captured as health systems become more and more digitized.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信