DOAC和HAS-BLED评分在预测亚洲接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的非瓣膜性房颤患者大出血中的作用

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf251
Yi-Hsin Chan, Yi-Wei Kao, Shao-Wei Chen, Tze-Fan Chao
{"title":"DOAC和HAS-BLED评分在预测亚洲接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的非瓣膜性房颤患者大出血中的作用","authors":"Yi-Hsin Chan, Yi-Wei Kao, Shao-Wei Chen, Tze-Fan Chao","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) score was recently developed to predict bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulants. However, limited data show inconsistent results comparing its performance to the conventional HAS-BLED score in Asian populations with non-valvular AF receiving DOACs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 21,142 patients with non-valvular AF receiving DOACs from a multicenter database in Taiwan (June 2012-December 2021). The primary endpoint was major bleeding events. Major bleeding events were defined according to the ISTH criteria. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated for each score, with differences assessed using DeLong test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21,142 AF patients (mean age 75.9±11.0 years; 41% female) treated with DOAC were included in the analysis. Major bleeding events occurred in 681 patients in one-year follow-up (3.66%/year). There were 82(0.43%/year) intracranial hemorrhage event occurred. Both the DOAC and HAS-BLED scores are associated with a significant risk of major bleeding event, with only modest predictive performance (AUC <0.7). The DOAC score showed a slightly but statistically significantly higher AUC compared with the HAS-BLED score (AUC:0.670, [95 %CI:0.650-0.689]) vs. 0.642, [0.623-0.663]; P<.001). Results from several reclassification analyses favored the DOAC score. Both the two scores showed a good calibration for the low to intermediate risk categories, while the two bleeding risk scores both overestimate the risk of major bleeding risk for the high risk categories. Subgroup analyses indicated that the superiority of DOAC score over HAS-BLED score is primarily driven by elderly patients (≥75 years) and prediction in risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DOAC score, which employs a more granular scoring system compared to the HAS-BLED score, may enable finer bleeding risk discrimination among Asian patients with non-valvular AF receiving DOAC therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of DOAC and HAS-BLED scores in predicting major bleeding in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving direct oral anticoagulants.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Hsin Chan, Yi-Wei Kao, Shao-Wei Chen, Tze-Fan Chao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euaf251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) score was recently developed to predict bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulants. However, limited data show inconsistent results comparing its performance to the conventional HAS-BLED score in Asian populations with non-valvular AF receiving DOACs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 21,142 patients with non-valvular AF receiving DOACs from a multicenter database in Taiwan (June 2012-December 2021). The primary endpoint was major bleeding events. Major bleeding events were defined according to the ISTH criteria. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated for each score, with differences assessed using DeLong test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21,142 AF patients (mean age 75.9±11.0 years; 41% female) treated with DOAC were included in the analysis. Major bleeding events occurred in 681 patients in one-year follow-up (3.66%/year). There were 82(0.43%/year) intracranial hemorrhage event occurred. Both the DOAC and HAS-BLED scores are associated with a significant risk of major bleeding event, with only modest predictive performance (AUC <0.7). The DOAC score showed a slightly but statistically significantly higher AUC compared with the HAS-BLED score (AUC:0.670, [95 %CI:0.650-0.689]) vs. 0.642, [0.623-0.663]; P<.001). Results from several reclassification analyses favored the DOAC score. Both the two scores showed a good calibration for the low to intermediate risk categories, while the two bleeding risk scores both overestimate the risk of major bleeding risk for the high risk categories. Subgroup analyses indicated that the superiority of DOAC score over HAS-BLED score is primarily driven by elderly patients (≥75 years) and prediction in risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DOAC score, which employs a more granular scoring system compared to the HAS-BLED score, may enable finer bleeding risk discrimination among Asian patients with non-valvular AF receiving DOAC therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europace\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf251\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf251","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:最近开发了直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)评分来预测心房颤动(AF)患者接受口服抗凝剂的出血风险。然而,有限的数据显示,在接受DOACs的亚洲非瓣膜性房颤患者中,其表现与传统的HAS-BLED评分结果不一致。方法:我们从台湾的一个多中心数据库(2012年6月- 2021年12月)中招募了21142例接受DOACs治疗的非瓣膜性房颤患者。主要终点是大出血事件。根据ISTH标准定义大出血事件。计算每个评分的受试者工作特征曲线(auc)下面积,采用DeLong检验评估差异。结果:经DOAC治疗的房颤患者共21142例(平均年龄75.9±11.0岁,女性41%)纳入分析。随访1年发生大出血事件681例(3.66%/年)。发生颅内出血82例(0.43%/年)。DOAC和HAS-BLED评分均与大出血事件的显著风险相关,仅具有中等的预测性能(AUC结论:与HAS-BLED评分相比,DOAC评分采用更细颗粒的评分系统,可以在接受DOAC治疗的亚洲非瓣膜性房颤患者中进行更精细的出血风险区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of DOAC and HAS-BLED scores in predicting major bleeding in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving direct oral anticoagulants.

Background and aims: The direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) score was recently developed to predict bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulants. However, limited data show inconsistent results comparing its performance to the conventional HAS-BLED score in Asian populations with non-valvular AF receiving DOACs.

Methods: We enrolled 21,142 patients with non-valvular AF receiving DOACs from a multicenter database in Taiwan (June 2012-December 2021). The primary endpoint was major bleeding events. Major bleeding events were defined according to the ISTH criteria. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated for each score, with differences assessed using DeLong test.

Results: A total of 21,142 AF patients (mean age 75.9±11.0 years; 41% female) treated with DOAC were included in the analysis. Major bleeding events occurred in 681 patients in one-year follow-up (3.66%/year). There were 82(0.43%/year) intracranial hemorrhage event occurred. Both the DOAC and HAS-BLED scores are associated with a significant risk of major bleeding event, with only modest predictive performance (AUC <0.7). The DOAC score showed a slightly but statistically significantly higher AUC compared with the HAS-BLED score (AUC:0.670, [95 %CI:0.650-0.689]) vs. 0.642, [0.623-0.663]; P<.001). Results from several reclassification analyses favored the DOAC score. Both the two scores showed a good calibration for the low to intermediate risk categories, while the two bleeding risk scores both overestimate the risk of major bleeding risk for the high risk categories. Subgroup analyses indicated that the superiority of DOAC score over HAS-BLED score is primarily driven by elderly patients (≥75 years) and prediction in risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Conclusions: The DOAC score, which employs a more granular scoring system compared to the HAS-BLED score, may enable finer bleeding risk discrimination among Asian patients with non-valvular AF receiving DOAC therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信