全球学校供餐计划对儿童健康和福祉结果的影响:范围审查。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Amy Locke, M James, Hope Jones, Rachel Davies, Francesca Williams, Sinead Brophy
{"title":"全球学校供餐计划对儿童健康和福祉结果的影响:范围审查。","authors":"Amy Locke, M James, Hope Jones, Rachel Davies, Francesca Williams, Sinead Brophy","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>School feeding programmes (SFPs) are widely implemented to address child poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition, yet evidence on their influence on children's health outcomes is limited. With ongoing debate around universal versus targeted provision, this scoping review aims to map global literature on SFPs, identify which health and well-being outcomes are reported, and explore how these outcomes vary by programme type (targeted vs universal).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Four electronic databases-Medline, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar-were searched in December 2023 and July 2025. Reference lists of included papers were also screened.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Included studies examined the impact of SFPs on physical, emotional, psychological and social health outcomes in children aged 5-16. Only English-language studies published between 2009 and 2025 were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted using a structured template and reviewed by multiple authors. Due to the heterogeneity in study designs and reported outcomes, a narrative synthesis approach was used to group findings thematically, following established guidance for narrative synthesis in systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 papers were included in the final review, spanning 13 countries and published between 2009 and 2025. SFPs were associated with healthier weight status, improved dietary intake, better social engagement and reductions in stigma. Targeted programmes addressed food insecurity but were more often linked to stigma and poorer mental health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Universal SFP were effective at improving children's health outcomes such as healthy weight, improved behaviour and social support. Overall, both targeted and universal SFP positively impact children's health outcomes and address health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e093244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of Global School Feeding Programmes on Children's Health and Wellbeing Outcomes: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Locke, M James, Hope Jones, Rachel Davies, Francesca Williams, Sinead Brophy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>School feeding programmes (SFPs) are widely implemented to address child poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition, yet evidence on their influence on children's health outcomes is limited. With ongoing debate around universal versus targeted provision, this scoping review aims to map global literature on SFPs, identify which health and well-being outcomes are reported, and explore how these outcomes vary by programme type (targeted vs universal).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Four electronic databases-Medline, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar-were searched in December 2023 and July 2025. Reference lists of included papers were also screened.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Included studies examined the impact of SFPs on physical, emotional, psychological and social health outcomes in children aged 5-16. Only English-language studies published between 2009 and 2025 were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted using a structured template and reviewed by multiple authors. Due to the heterogeneity in study designs and reported outcomes, a narrative synthesis approach was used to group findings thematically, following established guidance for narrative synthesis in systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 papers were included in the final review, spanning 13 countries and published between 2009 and 2025. SFPs were associated with healthier weight status, improved dietary intake, better social engagement and reductions in stigma. Targeted programmes addressed food insecurity but were more often linked to stigma and poorer mental health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Universal SFP were effective at improving children's health outcomes such as healthy weight, improved behaviour and social support. Overall, both targeted and universal SFP positively impact children's health outcomes and address health disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"e093244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:广泛实施学校供餐方案,以解决儿童贫困、粮食不安全和营养不良问题,但有关这些方案对儿童健康结果影响的证据有限。由于关于普遍提供与有针对性提供的辩论正在进行,本次范围审查旨在绘制关于可持续发展计划的全球文献图,确定报告了哪些健康和福祉结果,并探讨这些结果如何因规划类型而异(有针对性的与普遍的)。设计:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行范围评价。该协议已在开放科学框架上预先注册。数据来源:检索时间为2023年12月和2025年7月,检索时间为medline、PubMed、Web of Science和谷歌scholar四个电子数据库。还筛选了纳入论文的参考文献清单。入选标准:纳入的研究考察了SFPs对5-16岁儿童身体、情感、心理和社会健康结果的影响。仅包括2009年至2025年间发表的英语研究。数据提取和合成:使用结构化模板提取数据,并由多位作者审阅。由于研究设计和报告结果的异质性,采用叙述综合方法按主题对研究结果进行分组,遵循系统综述中叙述综合的既定指导。结果:最终评审共纳入44篇论文,涵盖13个国家,发表时间为2009年至2025年。SFPs与健康的体重状况、改善的饮食摄入、更好的社会参与和减少耻辱感有关。有针对性的方案解决了粮食不安全问题,但往往与耻辱和较差的心理健康结果联系在一起。结论:通用SFP可有效改善儿童健康结果,如健康体重、改善行为和社会支持。总体而言,有针对性的和普遍的SFP对儿童的健康结果和解决健康差距都产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of Global School Feeding Programmes on Children's Health and Wellbeing Outcomes: A Scoping Review.

Objectives: School feeding programmes (SFPs) are widely implemented to address child poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition, yet evidence on their influence on children's health outcomes is limited. With ongoing debate around universal versus targeted provision, this scoping review aims to map global literature on SFPs, identify which health and well-being outcomes are reported, and explore how these outcomes vary by programme type (targeted vs universal).

Design: Scoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework.

Data sources: Four electronic databases-Medline, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar-were searched in December 2023 and July 2025. Reference lists of included papers were also screened.

Eligibility criteria: Included studies examined the impact of SFPs on physical, emotional, psychological and social health outcomes in children aged 5-16. Only English-language studies published between 2009 and 2025 were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted using a structured template and reviewed by multiple authors. Due to the heterogeneity in study designs and reported outcomes, a narrative synthesis approach was used to group findings thematically, following established guidance for narrative synthesis in systematic reviews.

Results: A total of 44 papers were included in the final review, spanning 13 countries and published between 2009 and 2025. SFPs were associated with healthier weight status, improved dietary intake, better social engagement and reductions in stigma. Targeted programmes addressed food insecurity but were more often linked to stigma and poorer mental health outcomes.

Conclusions: Universal SFP were effective at improving children's health outcomes such as healthy weight, improved behaviour and social support. Overall, both targeted and universal SFP positively impact children's health outcomes and address health disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信