残疾医生公平职业发展的障碍、促进因素和解决方案:综合评价。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Megan E L Brown, Bryan Burford, Gillian Vance
{"title":"残疾医生公平职业发展的障碍、促进因素和解决方案:综合评价。","authors":"Megan E L Brown, Bryan Burford, Gillian Vance","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disabled resident doctors face persistent structural, cultural and institutional barriers to career progression. This integrative review synthesises empirical and grey literature to identify the challenges disabled doctors encounter, the practices that support their careers and the potential solutions applicable to healthcare, in particular National Health Service (NHS), settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Integrative literature review using a content analysis approach to data analysis. Included sources were published in English and examined disabled doctors' career progression or included disabled doctors as a separate subgroup. Opinion pieces without empirical grounding and articles not available in full text were excluded.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>International postgraduate medical education, with consideration for transferability and applicability to the UK NHS.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Focused on the experiences and careers of disabled resident doctors, at any stage of their career, prior to completion of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Equity guidelines, 53 sources were included and analysed. Structural ableism, inaccessible systems and stigma around disclosure were consistently identified as barriers to career progression. Facilitators included mentorship, affirming supervisory relationships and identity-affirming networks. Promising practices included universal design approaches, anticipatory rather than reactive approaches to making adjustments and integration of disability equity into organisational governance. However, most initiatives remain unevaluated, and UK-specific evidence is limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While awareness of barriers is growing, evidence-based solutions remain underdeveloped and unevenly implemented. To build a sustainable and representative medical workforce, workforce policy and planning must not only remove barriers to progression for disabled doctors, but also embed disability inclusion into the structures and cultures that shape medical career paths.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e106639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers, facilitators and solutions to equitable career progression for disabled doctors: an integrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Megan E L Brown, Bryan Burford, Gillian Vance\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disabled resident doctors face persistent structural, cultural and institutional barriers to career progression. This integrative review synthesises empirical and grey literature to identify the challenges disabled doctors encounter, the practices that support their careers and the potential solutions applicable to healthcare, in particular National Health Service (NHS), settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Integrative literature review using a content analysis approach to data analysis. Included sources were published in English and examined disabled doctors' career progression or included disabled doctors as a separate subgroup. Opinion pieces without empirical grounding and articles not available in full text were excluded.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>International postgraduate medical education, with consideration for transferability and applicability to the UK NHS.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Focused on the experiences and careers of disabled resident doctors, at any stage of their career, prior to completion of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Equity guidelines, 53 sources were included and analysed. Structural ableism, inaccessible systems and stigma around disclosure were consistently identified as barriers to career progression. Facilitators included mentorship, affirming supervisory relationships and identity-affirming networks. Promising practices included universal design approaches, anticipatory rather than reactive approaches to making adjustments and integration of disability equity into organisational governance. However, most initiatives remain unevaluated, and UK-specific evidence is limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While awareness of barriers is growing, evidence-based solutions remain underdeveloped and unevenly implemented. To build a sustainable and representative medical workforce, workforce policy and planning must not only remove barriers to progression for disabled doctors, but also embed disability inclusion into the structures and cultures that shape medical career paths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"e106639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106639\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:残疾住院医生在职业发展中面临着持续的结构、文化和制度障碍。这篇综合评论综合了经验和灰色文献,以确定残疾医生遇到的挑战,支持他们职业生涯的做法和适用于医疗保健的潜在解决方案,特别是国家卫生服务(NHS),设置。设计:综合文献综述,采用内容分析方法进行数据分析。纳入的资料以英文出版,并检查残疾医生的职业发展,或将残疾医生作为一个单独的亚组纳入。没有经验根据的观点和没有全文的文章被排除在外。设置:国际研究生医学教育,考虑可转移性和适用性到英国国民健康保险制度。参与者:重点关注残疾住院医生在其职业生涯的任何阶段,在完成培训之前的经历和职业生涯。结果:根据系统评价和meta分析-公平指南的首选报告项目,纳入并分析了53个来源。结构性残疾歧视、难以接近的制度和对信息披露的耻辱一直被认为是职业发展的障碍。促进因素包括师徒关系、确认监督关系和身份确认网络。有希望的做法包括通用设计方法,预先而不是被动地进行调整,并将残疾平等纳入组织治理。然而,大多数倡议仍未得到评估,英国特有的证据有限。结论:虽然对障碍的认识正在提高,但基于证据的解决方案仍然不发达,实施不均衡。为了建立一支可持续和具有代表性的医疗队伍,劳动力政策和规划不仅必须消除残疾医生晋升的障碍,而且还必须将残疾包容融入塑造医疗职业道路的结构和文化中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers, facilitators and solutions to equitable career progression for disabled doctors: an integrative review.

Objectives: Disabled resident doctors face persistent structural, cultural and institutional barriers to career progression. This integrative review synthesises empirical and grey literature to identify the challenges disabled doctors encounter, the practices that support their careers and the potential solutions applicable to healthcare, in particular National Health Service (NHS), settings.

Design: Integrative literature review using a content analysis approach to data analysis. Included sources were published in English and examined disabled doctors' career progression or included disabled doctors as a separate subgroup. Opinion pieces without empirical grounding and articles not available in full text were excluded.

Setting: International postgraduate medical education, with consideration for transferability and applicability to the UK NHS.

Participants: Focused on the experiences and careers of disabled resident doctors, at any stage of their career, prior to completion of training.

Results: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Equity guidelines, 53 sources were included and analysed. Structural ableism, inaccessible systems and stigma around disclosure were consistently identified as barriers to career progression. Facilitators included mentorship, affirming supervisory relationships and identity-affirming networks. Promising practices included universal design approaches, anticipatory rather than reactive approaches to making adjustments and integration of disability equity into organisational governance. However, most initiatives remain unevaluated, and UK-specific evidence is limited.

Conclusions: While awareness of barriers is growing, evidence-based solutions remain underdeveloped and unevenly implemented. To build a sustainable and representative medical workforce, workforce policy and planning must not only remove barriers to progression for disabled doctors, but also embed disability inclusion into the structures and cultures that shape medical career paths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信