2007年至2019年美国房颤和心房扑动门诊患者抗凝药物使用的种族差异和趋势

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Vincent Kan, Kate Lapane, David McManus, Jonggyu Baek, Chad Darling, Matthew Alcusky
{"title":"2007年至2019年美国房颤和心房扑动门诊患者抗凝药物使用的种族差异和趋势","authors":"Vincent Kan, Kate Lapane, David McManus, Jonggyu Baek, Chad Darling, Matthew Alcusky","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13397-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of stroke. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) since 2010 has transformed anticoagulation therapy, offering an alternative to warfarin with improved safety profiles. Despite the increased adoption of DOACs, disparities in their use among different racial and ethnic groups in the United States remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a repeated cross-sectional design, analyzing data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2007 to 2019. The study population included adults diagnosed with AF or atrial flutter (AFL). We analyzed the temporal trends of DOAC and warfarin use from 2007 to 2019. We examined the prevalence of DOAC versus warfarin use and assessed associations between race/ethnicity, patient characteristics, and DOAC utilization from 2011 to 2019. Multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2011 to 2019, NAMCS recorded 3,224 visits involving AF or AFL, representing a weighted estimate of 103.6 million visits. DOAC use increased significantly, with apixaban becoming the predominant anticoagulant by 2016. The rate of DOAC adoption was slower for non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White patients over time (aPR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.90). Patients with Medicaid insurance were also less likely to use DOACs (aPR 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the shift from warfarin to DOACs for AF and AFL treatment, significant racial and socioeconomic disparities persist. Non-Hispanic Black patients adopted to DOAC use more slowly than non-Hispanic White patients, widening the treatment gap over time. Those with Medicaid insurance are less likely to use DOACs compared to those with private insurance. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to ensure equitable access to advanced anticoagulant therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1300"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial disparities and trends in anticoagulant use among ambulatory care patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the United States from 2007 to 2019.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Kan, Kate Lapane, David McManus, Jonggyu Baek, Chad Darling, Matthew Alcusky\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-13397-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of stroke. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) since 2010 has transformed anticoagulation therapy, offering an alternative to warfarin with improved safety profiles. Despite the increased adoption of DOACs, disparities in their use among different racial and ethnic groups in the United States remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a repeated cross-sectional design, analyzing data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2007 to 2019. The study population included adults diagnosed with AF or atrial flutter (AFL). We analyzed the temporal trends of DOAC and warfarin use from 2007 to 2019. We examined the prevalence of DOAC versus warfarin use and assessed associations between race/ethnicity, patient characteristics, and DOAC utilization from 2011 to 2019. Multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2011 to 2019, NAMCS recorded 3,224 visits involving AF or AFL, representing a weighted estimate of 103.6 million visits. DOAC use increased significantly, with apixaban becoming the predominant anticoagulant by 2016. The rate of DOAC adoption was slower for non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White patients over time (aPR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.90). Patients with Medicaid insurance were also less likely to use DOACs (aPR 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the shift from warfarin to DOACs for AF and AFL treatment, significant racial and socioeconomic disparities persist. Non-Hispanic Black patients adopted to DOAC use more slowly than non-Hispanic White patients, widening the treatment gap over time. Those with Medicaid insurance are less likely to use DOACs compared to those with private insurance. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to ensure equitable access to advanced anticoagulant therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13397-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13397-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

房颤(AF)是最常见的持续性心律失常,显著增加卒中的风险。自2010年以来,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的引入改变了抗凝治疗,为华法林提供了一种安全性更高的替代方案。尽管doac的使用越来越多,但在美国不同种族和民族群体中使用doac的差异仍未得到充分研究。方法:本研究采用重复横断面设计,分析2007 - 2019年全国门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)的数据。研究人群包括诊断为房颤或心房扑动(AFL)的成年人。我们分析了2007 - 2019年DOAC和华法林使用的时间趋势。我们检查了2011年至2019年DOAC与华法林使用的流行情况,并评估了种族/民族、患者特征和DOAC使用之间的关系。采用多变量修正泊松回归模型计算相关性的校正患病率(aPR)。结果:从2011年到2019年,NAMCS记录了3224次涉及AF或AFL的就诊,加权估计为1.036亿次就诊。DOAC的使用显著增加,到2016年阿哌沙班成为主要的抗凝剂。随着时间的推移,与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,非西班牙裔黑人患者的DOAC采用率较慢(aPR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.90)。有医疗补助保险的患者也不太可能使用doac (aPR 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.46)。结论:尽管在房颤和AFL治疗中从华法林转向DOACs,但显著的种族和社会经济差异仍然存在。非西班牙裔黑人患者采用DOAC的速度比非西班牙裔白人患者慢,随着时间的推移,治疗差距越来越大。与那些有私人保险的人相比,那些有医疗补助保险的人不太可能使用doac。这些发现强调需要有针对性的策略来确保公平获得先进的抗凝治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial disparities and trends in anticoagulant use among ambulatory care patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the United States from 2007 to 2019.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of stroke. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) since 2010 has transformed anticoagulation therapy, offering an alternative to warfarin with improved safety profiles. Despite the increased adoption of DOACs, disparities in their use among different racial and ethnic groups in the United States remain understudied.

Methods: This study utilized a repeated cross-sectional design, analyzing data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2007 to 2019. The study population included adults diagnosed with AF or atrial flutter (AFL). We analyzed the temporal trends of DOAC and warfarin use from 2007 to 2019. We examined the prevalence of DOAC versus warfarin use and assessed associations between race/ethnicity, patient characteristics, and DOAC utilization from 2011 to 2019. Multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for the associations.

Results: From 2011 to 2019, NAMCS recorded 3,224 visits involving AF or AFL, representing a weighted estimate of 103.6 million visits. DOAC use increased significantly, with apixaban becoming the predominant anticoagulant by 2016. The rate of DOAC adoption was slower for non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White patients over time (aPR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.90). Patients with Medicaid insurance were also less likely to use DOACs (aPR 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.46).

Conclusion: Despite the shift from warfarin to DOACs for AF and AFL treatment, significant racial and socioeconomic disparities persist. Non-Hispanic Black patients adopted to DOAC use more slowly than non-Hispanic White patients, widening the treatment gap over time. Those with Medicaid insurance are less likely to use DOACs compared to those with private insurance. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to ensure equitable access to advanced anticoagulant therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信