尼日利亚西南部孕妇疫苗犹豫的决定因素:解释性顺序混合方法设计

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Olorunfemi Akinbode Ogundele, Oyinkansola Omoloja, Anne Osimokhua Zibiri, Ayokunle Victor Dinehin, Adeola Oluwaseyi Adewusi, John Nwabueze
{"title":"尼日利亚西南部孕妇疫苗犹豫的决定因素:解释性顺序混合方法设计","authors":"Olorunfemi Akinbode Ogundele, Oyinkansola Omoloja, Anne Osimokhua Zibiri, Ayokunle Victor Dinehin, Adeola Oluwaseyi Adewusi, John Nwabueze","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prevalence and determinants of vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in South-West Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted between January and March 2023. Participants for the quantitative phase were selected using a systematic sampling technique, while those for the qualitative phase were purposively selected. A modified parent attitude about childhood vaccines questionnaire was used for data collection and analysed using IBM SPSS V.25.0. Qualitative data were collected through focus group discussions and analysed using NVivo V.14. Univariable, bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary health facility in South-West Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three hundred and forty-five pregnant women participated in the quantitative phase, while 24 pregnant women were involved in the qualitative phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 32%. Based on the domains, only 15.4% of the respondents were hesitant due to vaccination behaviour, 38.6% for safety and efficacy, and 49.6% were hesitant due to general attitude and trust for healthcare providers. Maternal age, number of children, religion and occupation showed significant association with vaccine hesitancy. Regarding the predictors of vaccine hesitancy, employed pregnant women (adjusted OR (aOR), 4.33; 95% CI: 1.60 to 9.70) and younger pregnant women (aOR, 2.53; 95% CI: 1.04 to 7.70) had a significantly higher odds of being vaccine-hesitant. The qualitative analyses revealed several major themes that contributed to vaccine hesitancy, including concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, distrust of healthcare providers and the government, and the spread of misinformation through social networks and peers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of pregnant women in this study were vaccine-hesitant. The major reasons for vaccine hesitancy are concerns about the safety of vaccines and lack of trust for healthcare providers. Policies and programmes should be aimed at improving vaccination behaviour, addressing safety concerns and building trust in vaccination systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e101767"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in South-West Nigeria: an explanatory sequential mixed method design.\",\"authors\":\"Olorunfemi Akinbode Ogundele, Oyinkansola Omoloja, Anne Osimokhua Zibiri, Ayokunle Victor Dinehin, Adeola Oluwaseyi Adewusi, John Nwabueze\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prevalence and determinants of vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in South-West Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted between January and March 2023. Participants for the quantitative phase were selected using a systematic sampling technique, while those for the qualitative phase were purposively selected. A modified parent attitude about childhood vaccines questionnaire was used for data collection and analysed using IBM SPSS V.25.0. Qualitative data were collected through focus group discussions and analysed using NVivo V.14. Univariable, bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary health facility in South-West Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three hundred and forty-five pregnant women participated in the quantitative phase, while 24 pregnant women were involved in the qualitative phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 32%. Based on the domains, only 15.4% of the respondents were hesitant due to vaccination behaviour, 38.6% for safety and efficacy, and 49.6% were hesitant due to general attitude and trust for healthcare providers. Maternal age, number of children, religion and occupation showed significant association with vaccine hesitancy. Regarding the predictors of vaccine hesitancy, employed pregnant women (adjusted OR (aOR), 4.33; 95% CI: 1.60 to 9.70) and younger pregnant women (aOR, 2.53; 95% CI: 1.04 to 7.70) had a significantly higher odds of being vaccine-hesitant. The qualitative analyses revealed several major themes that contributed to vaccine hesitancy, including concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, distrust of healthcare providers and the government, and the spread of misinformation through social networks and peers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of pregnant women in this study were vaccine-hesitant. The major reasons for vaccine hesitancy are concerns about the safety of vaccines and lack of trust for healthcare providers. Policies and programmes should be aimed at improving vaccination behaviour, addressing safety concerns and building trust in vaccination systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"e101767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101767\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估尼日利亚西南部孕妇中疫苗犹豫的患病率和决定因素。设计:一项解释性顺序混合方法研究于2023年1月至3月进行。定量阶段的参与者采用系统的抽样技术进行选择,而定性阶段的参与者则是有目的的选择。采用修改后的儿童疫苗家长态度问卷进行数据收集,并使用IBM SPSS V.25.0进行分析。通过焦点小组讨论收集定性数据,并使用NVivo V.14进行分析。进行单变量、双变量和多变量logistic回归分析。A .环境:尼日利亚西南部的一个三级卫生设施。参与者:345名孕妇参与定量阶段,24名孕妇参与定性阶段。结果:疫苗犹豫总体患病率为32%。基于这些领域,只有15.4%的受访者因疫苗接种行为而犹豫不决,38.6%的受访者因安全性和有效性而犹豫不决,49.6%的受访者因对医疗保健提供者的总体态度和信任而犹豫不决。母亲年龄、子女数目、宗教和职业与疫苗犹豫有显著关联。关于疫苗犹豫的预测因素,在职孕妇(调整OR (aOR), 4.33;95% CI: 1.60 ~ 9.70)和较年轻的孕妇(aOR, 2.53; 95% CI: 1.04 ~ 7.70)出现疫苗犹豫的几率明显更高。定性分析揭示了导致疫苗犹豫的几个主要主题,包括对疫苗安全性和有效性的担忧,对医疗保健提供者和政府的不信任,以及通过社交网络和同伴传播错误信息。结论:本研究中有相当比例的孕妇对接种疫苗犹豫不决。对疫苗犹豫不决的主要原因是对疫苗安全性的担忧以及对卫生保健提供者缺乏信任。政策和规划应旨在改善疫苗接种行为,解决安全问题并建立对疫苗接种系统的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determinants of vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in South-West Nigeria: an explanatory sequential mixed method design.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and determinants of vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in South-West Nigeria.

Design: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted between January and March 2023. Participants for the quantitative phase were selected using a systematic sampling technique, while those for the qualitative phase were purposively selected. A modified parent attitude about childhood vaccines questionnaire was used for data collection and analysed using IBM SPSS V.25.0. Qualitative data were collected through focus group discussions and analysed using NVivo V.14. Univariable, bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Setting: A tertiary health facility in South-West Nigeria.

Participants: Three hundred and forty-five pregnant women participated in the quantitative phase, while 24 pregnant women were involved in the qualitative phase.

Results: The overall prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 32%. Based on the domains, only 15.4% of the respondents were hesitant due to vaccination behaviour, 38.6% for safety and efficacy, and 49.6% were hesitant due to general attitude and trust for healthcare providers. Maternal age, number of children, religion and occupation showed significant association with vaccine hesitancy. Regarding the predictors of vaccine hesitancy, employed pregnant women (adjusted OR (aOR), 4.33; 95% CI: 1.60 to 9.70) and younger pregnant women (aOR, 2.53; 95% CI: 1.04 to 7.70) had a significantly higher odds of being vaccine-hesitant. The qualitative analyses revealed several major themes that contributed to vaccine hesitancy, including concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, distrust of healthcare providers and the government, and the spread of misinformation through social networks and peers.

Conclusion: A significant proportion of pregnant women in this study were vaccine-hesitant. The major reasons for vaccine hesitancy are concerns about the safety of vaccines and lack of trust for healthcare providers. Policies and programmes should be aimed at improving vaccination behaviour, addressing safety concerns and building trust in vaccination systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信