主动脉弓血管内修复手术去分支的中期结果。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Paolo Spath, Stefania Caputo, Enrico Gallitto, Antonino DI Leo, Gemmi Sufali, Rodolfo Pini, Andrea Vacirca, Gianluca Faggioli, Mauro Gargiulo
{"title":"主动脉弓血管内修复手术去分支的中期结果。","authors":"Paolo Spath, Stefania Caputo, Enrico Gallitto, Antonino DI Leo, Gemmi Sufali, Rodolfo Pini, Andrea Vacirca, Gianluca Faggioli, Mauro Gargiulo","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of surgical debranching of supra-aortic trunks(dSAT) for the endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective analysis (2014-2024) of patients undergoing dSAT associated with endovascular treatment involving thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in the aortic arch, was performed. Primary endpoints were defined on dSAT; secondary endpoints on patients. Subgroup analyses considered dSAT combined vs deferred to endovascular procedure. Cross-table analysis was performed for categorial variables and Kaplan-Meier for follow-up analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients (mean age:71, 78% male), were included. Pathologies included aortic arch(24%) and thoracic/thoracoabdominal(76%) diseases. A total of 87 dSAT were performed: a left common carotid artery(LCCA)-left subclavian artery(LSA) bypass in 57(70%) cases, a right-common carotid artery to LSA with reimplant of LCCA in 18(22%), bilateral carotid-subclavian bypasses in 5(6%), two(2%) direct reimplants(LCCA; vertebral artery). Seventy patients(85%) had a single and 12(15%) had a deferred endovascular repair. Technical success was 100%. 30-days dSAT related reinterventions were 7(8%)(one arterial dissection and 6 bleedings). Non-surgical dSAT complications were 4(5%)(3 left vocal cord paralysis; 1 chylothorax). Thirty-day mortality was 8%(7 patients), unrelated to dSAT. No cases of stroke were reported. Subgroup analysis showed absence of debranching related complications/reinterventions in deferred group. Median follow-up 20 months(IQR10-37). Follow-up debranching primary patency was 100% without reinterventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dSAT is a safe and effective procedure for endovascular treatment of aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. Patency is high and reinterventions/complications are mainly linked to bleedings and seem to have a positive trend when endovascular procedure is performed in deferred stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MID-TERM RESULTS OF SURGICAL DEBRANCHING FOR AORTIC ARCH ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Spath, Stefania Caputo, Enrico Gallitto, Antonino DI Leo, Gemmi Sufali, Rodolfo Pini, Andrea Vacirca, Gianluca Faggioli, Mauro Gargiulo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of surgical debranching of supra-aortic trunks(dSAT) for the endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective analysis (2014-2024) of patients undergoing dSAT associated with endovascular treatment involving thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in the aortic arch, was performed. Primary endpoints were defined on dSAT; secondary endpoints on patients. Subgroup analyses considered dSAT combined vs deferred to endovascular procedure. Cross-table analysis was performed for categorial variables and Kaplan-Meier for follow-up analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients (mean age:71, 78% male), were included. Pathologies included aortic arch(24%) and thoracic/thoracoabdominal(76%) diseases. A total of 87 dSAT were performed: a left common carotid artery(LCCA)-left subclavian artery(LSA) bypass in 57(70%) cases, a right-common carotid artery to LSA with reimplant of LCCA in 18(22%), bilateral carotid-subclavian bypasses in 5(6%), two(2%) direct reimplants(LCCA; vertebral artery). Seventy patients(85%) had a single and 12(15%) had a deferred endovascular repair. Technical success was 100%. 30-days dSAT related reinterventions were 7(8%)(one arterial dissection and 6 bleedings). Non-surgical dSAT complications were 4(5%)(3 left vocal cord paralysis; 1 chylothorax). Thirty-day mortality was 8%(7 patients), unrelated to dSAT. No cases of stroke were reported. Subgroup analysis showed absence of debranching related complications/reinterventions in deferred group. Median follow-up 20 months(IQR10-37). Follow-up debranching primary patency was 100% without reinterventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dSAT is a safe and effective procedure for endovascular treatment of aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. Patency is high and reinterventions/complications are mainly linked to bleedings and seem to have a positive trend when endovascular procedure is performed in deferred stage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:评价主动脉上干手术去分支(dSAT)在血管内治疗主动脉弓病变中的效果。方法:对2014-2024年接受dSAT相关血管内治疗的主动脉弓胸椎血管内修复(TEVAR)患者进行单中心回顾性分析。主要终点在dSAT上定义;次要终点是患者。亚组分析考虑dSAT联合或延迟血管内手术。分类变量采用交叉表分析,随访分析采用Kaplan-Meier分析。结果:共纳入82例患者,平均年龄71岁,其中男性78%。病理包括主动脉弓(24%)和胸/胸腹(76%)疾病。共进行了87例dSAT手术:左侧颈总动脉(LCCA)-左侧锁骨下动脉(LSA)旁路57例(70%),右侧颈总动脉- LSA再植入LCCA 18例(22%),双侧颈-锁骨下旁路5例(6%),2例(2%)直接再植入术(LCCA;椎动脉)。70例(85%)患者进行了一次血管内修复,12例(15%)患者进行了延期血管内修复。技术上的成功率是100%。30天dSAT相关再干预7例(8%)(1例动脉夹层和6例出血)。非手术dSAT并发症4例(5%),其中左声带麻痹3例,乳糜胸1例。30天死亡率为8%(7例),与dSAT无关。没有中风病例报告。亚组分析显示,延期组无脱支相关并发症/再干预。中位随访20个月(IQR10-37)。随访去分支原发通畅100%,无再干预。结论:dSAT是血管内治疗累及主动脉弓的主动脉病变安全有效的方法。通畅度高,再干预/并发症主要与出血有关,当血管内手术在延迟阶段进行时,似乎有积极的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MID-TERM RESULTS OF SURGICAL DEBRANCHING FOR AORTIC ARCH ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR.

Introduction: To evaluate the outcomes of surgical debranching of supra-aortic trunks(dSAT) for the endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies.

Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis (2014-2024) of patients undergoing dSAT associated with endovascular treatment involving thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in the aortic arch, was performed. Primary endpoints were defined on dSAT; secondary endpoints on patients. Subgroup analyses considered dSAT combined vs deferred to endovascular procedure. Cross-table analysis was performed for categorial variables and Kaplan-Meier for follow-up analysis.

Results: Eighty-two patients (mean age:71, 78% male), were included. Pathologies included aortic arch(24%) and thoracic/thoracoabdominal(76%) diseases. A total of 87 dSAT were performed: a left common carotid artery(LCCA)-left subclavian artery(LSA) bypass in 57(70%) cases, a right-common carotid artery to LSA with reimplant of LCCA in 18(22%), bilateral carotid-subclavian bypasses in 5(6%), two(2%) direct reimplants(LCCA; vertebral artery). Seventy patients(85%) had a single and 12(15%) had a deferred endovascular repair. Technical success was 100%. 30-days dSAT related reinterventions were 7(8%)(one arterial dissection and 6 bleedings). Non-surgical dSAT complications were 4(5%)(3 left vocal cord paralysis; 1 chylothorax). Thirty-day mortality was 8%(7 patients), unrelated to dSAT. No cases of stroke were reported. Subgroup analysis showed absence of debranching related complications/reinterventions in deferred group. Median follow-up 20 months(IQR10-37). Follow-up debranching primary patency was 100% without reinterventions.

Conclusions: The dSAT is a safe and effective procedure for endovascular treatment of aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. Patency is high and reinterventions/complications are mainly linked to bleedings and seem to have a positive trend when endovascular procedure is performed in deferred stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信