针对安圭拉鳗特有的反转录转座子序列,对环境DNA分析的重大改进

IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Itsuki T. Hirayama, Yuta Kunimasa, Aya Takeuchi, Toshifumi Minamoto
{"title":"针对安圭拉鳗特有的反转录转座子序列,对环境DNA分析的重大改进","authors":"Itsuki T. Hirayama,&nbsp;Yuta Kunimasa,&nbsp;Aya Takeuchi,&nbsp;Toshifumi Minamoto","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis faces challenges regarding sensitivity and quantification accuracy, particularly in areas with low target species densities or during seasons when eDNA release decreases. Multi-copy markers such as mitochondrial genomic DNA and ribosomal DNA (rDNA) have been widely used in eDNA analysis to address this issue. However, the copy number of the DNA markers per cell remains a potential bottleneck for eDNA sensitivity. In this study, we aimed to increase the sensitivity of eDNA assays by using retrotransposons, which are abundant in the genome, as novel target markers. We developed an assay targeting UnaSINE1, a short interspersed nucleotide element (SINE) characteristic of <i>Anguilla</i> eels, and compared its sensitivity and accuracy with that of an established mitochondrial 16S rRNA marker. Our results demonstrated that UnaSINE1 was detected at over 100 times the copy number of the mitochondrial marker in both genomic and eDNA samples. In the river surveys, the 16S marker was positive in 32 of the 81 samples, whereas the UnaSINE1 marker was positive in 62 samples, indicating that the use of the SINE marker remarkably reduced false negatives. Furthermore, both biological and technical replicates exhibited improved positive consistency and reduced variability in quantification, leading to more robust presence/absence determination and quantitative results. Utilizing retrotransposon sequences as markers requires additional effort for sequence acquisition and organization and may limit taxonomic resolution to the genus level. However, this approach significantly improves sensitivity without increasing the labor or cost of sampling and PCR analysis, making it highly practical for eDNA studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70197","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significant Improvement of Environmental DNA Assay by Targeting Retrotransposon Sequences Characteristic to Anguilla Eels\",\"authors\":\"Itsuki T. Hirayama,&nbsp;Yuta Kunimasa,&nbsp;Aya Takeuchi,&nbsp;Toshifumi Minamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis faces challenges regarding sensitivity and quantification accuracy, particularly in areas with low target species densities or during seasons when eDNA release decreases. Multi-copy markers such as mitochondrial genomic DNA and ribosomal DNA (rDNA) have been widely used in eDNA analysis to address this issue. However, the copy number of the DNA markers per cell remains a potential bottleneck for eDNA sensitivity. In this study, we aimed to increase the sensitivity of eDNA assays by using retrotransposons, which are abundant in the genome, as novel target markers. We developed an assay targeting UnaSINE1, a short interspersed nucleotide element (SINE) characteristic of <i>Anguilla</i> eels, and compared its sensitivity and accuracy with that of an established mitochondrial 16S rRNA marker. Our results demonstrated that UnaSINE1 was detected at over 100 times the copy number of the mitochondrial marker in both genomic and eDNA samples. In the river surveys, the 16S marker was positive in 32 of the 81 samples, whereas the UnaSINE1 marker was positive in 62 samples, indicating that the use of the SINE marker remarkably reduced false negatives. Furthermore, both biological and technical replicates exhibited improved positive consistency and reduced variability in quantification, leading to more robust presence/absence determination and quantitative results. Utilizing retrotransposon sequences as markers requires additional effort for sequence acquisition and organization and may limit taxonomic resolution to the genus level. However, this approach significantly improves sensitivity without increasing the labor or cost of sampling and PCR analysis, making it highly practical for eDNA studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70197\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境DNA (eDNA)分析面临敏感性和定量准确性方面的挑战,特别是在目标物种密度低的地区或eDNA释放减少的季节。多拷贝标记如线粒体基因组DNA和核糖体DNA (rDNA)已被广泛应用于eDNA分析以解决这一问题。然而,每个细胞DNA标记的拷贝数仍然是eDNA敏感性的潜在瓶颈。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过使用基因组中丰富的反转录转座子作为新的靶标记来提高eDNA检测的敏感性。我们开发了一种针对UnaSINE1的检测方法,UnaSINE1是安圭拉鳗鱼的一种短穿插核苷酸元件(sin),并将其与已建立的线粒体16S rRNA标记物的灵敏度和准确性进行了比较。我们的结果表明,UnaSINE1在基因组和eDNA样品中检测到的线粒体标记拷贝数超过100倍。在河流调查中,16S标记在81个样本中有32个呈阳性,而UnaSINE1标记在62个样本中呈阳性,这表明使用SINE标记显著减少了假阴性。此外,生物和技术重复在定量方面均表现出更好的阳性一致性和减少的可变性,从而导致更可靠的存在/不存在测定和定量结果。利用反转录转座子序列作为标记需要额外的努力来获取和组织序列,并可能限制分类分辨率到属水平。然而,这种方法在不增加采样和PCR分析的人工或成本的情况下显著提高了灵敏度,使其在eDNA研究中具有很高的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Significant Improvement of Environmental DNA Assay by Targeting Retrotransposon Sequences Characteristic to Anguilla Eels

Significant Improvement of Environmental DNA Assay by Targeting Retrotransposon Sequences Characteristic to Anguilla Eels

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis faces challenges regarding sensitivity and quantification accuracy, particularly in areas with low target species densities or during seasons when eDNA release decreases. Multi-copy markers such as mitochondrial genomic DNA and ribosomal DNA (rDNA) have been widely used in eDNA analysis to address this issue. However, the copy number of the DNA markers per cell remains a potential bottleneck for eDNA sensitivity. In this study, we aimed to increase the sensitivity of eDNA assays by using retrotransposons, which are abundant in the genome, as novel target markers. We developed an assay targeting UnaSINE1, a short interspersed nucleotide element (SINE) characteristic of Anguilla eels, and compared its sensitivity and accuracy with that of an established mitochondrial 16S rRNA marker. Our results demonstrated that UnaSINE1 was detected at over 100 times the copy number of the mitochondrial marker in both genomic and eDNA samples. In the river surveys, the 16S marker was positive in 32 of the 81 samples, whereas the UnaSINE1 marker was positive in 62 samples, indicating that the use of the SINE marker remarkably reduced false negatives. Furthermore, both biological and technical replicates exhibited improved positive consistency and reduced variability in quantification, leading to more robust presence/absence determination and quantitative results. Utilizing retrotransposon sequences as markers requires additional effort for sequence acquisition and organization and may limit taxonomic resolution to the genus level. However, this approach significantly improves sensitivity without increasing the labor or cost of sampling and PCR analysis, making it highly practical for eDNA studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信