弥合数字健康的实施差距:公平医疗创新的转化研究势在必行

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laiba Husain, Katherine Kitchens, Saroop Raja, Madiha Memon
{"title":"弥合数字健康的实施差距:公平医疗创新的转化研究势在必行","authors":"Laiba Husain,&nbsp;Katherine Kitchens,&nbsp;Saroop Raja,&nbsp;Madiha Memon","doi":"10.1111/cts.70375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital health technologies' potential to democratize healthcare access appears constrained by implementation challenges that may reproduce existing inequities. This paper examines systemic barriers potentially impeding translation, suggesting prevailing frameworks inadequately address structural determinants. Despite substantial investment, limited FDA approvals for digital-derived endpoints indicate possible regulatory-innovation disjunctures, while constrained funding and incomplete reimbursement structures systematically exclude essential services. We propose a precision implementation framework repositioning implementation science as integral to technological development, potentially challenging linear translational paradigms. This approach emphasizes examining sociotechnical systems, organizational readiness variations, and community-specific contexts. Whether digital health mitigates or exacerbates disparities likely depends on reconceptualizing implementation as socio-organizational transformation requiring regulatory harmonization, sustainable economic models, and equity-centered engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70375","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Implementation Gaps in Digital Health: A Translational Research Imperative for Equitable Healthcare Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Laiba Husain,&nbsp;Katherine Kitchens,&nbsp;Saroop Raja,&nbsp;Madiha Memon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Digital health technologies' potential to democratize healthcare access appears constrained by implementation challenges that may reproduce existing inequities. This paper examines systemic barriers potentially impeding translation, suggesting prevailing frameworks inadequately address structural determinants. Despite substantial investment, limited FDA approvals for digital-derived endpoints indicate possible regulatory-innovation disjunctures, while constrained funding and incomplete reimbursement structures systematically exclude essential services. We propose a precision implementation framework repositioning implementation science as integral to technological development, potentially challenging linear translational paradigms. This approach emphasizes examining sociotechnical systems, organizational readiness variations, and community-specific contexts. Whether digital health mitigates or exacerbates disparities likely depends on reconceptualizing implementation as socio-organizational transformation requiring regulatory harmonization, sustainable economic models, and equity-centered engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70375\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字卫生技术实现医疗保健普及的潜力似乎受到可能再现现有不平等现象的实施挑战的限制。本文探讨了可能阻碍翻译的系统性障碍,表明现行框架没有充分解决结构性决定因素。尽管投入了大量资金,但FDA对数字衍生端点的批准有限,这表明可能存在监管创新中断,而资金受限和不完整的报销结构系统性地排除了基本服务。我们提出了一个精确的实施框架,将实施科学重新定位为技术发展的一部分,潜在地挑战线性转化范式。这种方法强调检查社会技术系统、组织准备变化和社区特定环境。数字健康是缓解还是加剧了差距,可能取决于将实施重新定义为需要监管协调、可持续经济模式和以公平为中心的参与的社会组织转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bridging Implementation Gaps in Digital Health: A Translational Research Imperative for Equitable Healthcare Innovation

Bridging Implementation Gaps in Digital Health: A Translational Research Imperative for Equitable Healthcare Innovation

Digital health technologies' potential to democratize healthcare access appears constrained by implementation challenges that may reproduce existing inequities. This paper examines systemic barriers potentially impeding translation, suggesting prevailing frameworks inadequately address structural determinants. Despite substantial investment, limited FDA approvals for digital-derived endpoints indicate possible regulatory-innovation disjunctures, while constrained funding and incomplete reimbursement structures systematically exclude essential services. We propose a precision implementation framework repositioning implementation science as integral to technological development, potentially challenging linear translational paradigms. This approach emphasizes examining sociotechnical systems, organizational readiness variations, and community-specific contexts. Whether digital health mitigates or exacerbates disparities likely depends on reconceptualizing implementation as socio-organizational transformation requiring regulatory harmonization, sustainable economic models, and equity-centered engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信