{"title":"混合溶剂中绝对摩尔质量的测定。假设100% SEC质量回收率获得的∂n/∂c值的准确性","authors":"André M. Striegel","doi":"10.1007/s10337-025-04438-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate values of the specific refractive index increment (∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i>) are essential to the accurate determination of molar mass averages, distributions, and related macromolecular parameters by, among others, size-based separations with online static light scattering and differential refractive index (DRI) detection. Examined here is the 100% mass recovery method of calculating the ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> of dilute macromolecular solutions, when employing mixed solvents in a size-based separation (e.g., size-exclusion chromatography or SEC) with DRI detection. This method has been used successfully in the past for determining the ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> of various polyelectrolytes. It is quicker, generally simpler, and less sample-intensive than its offline, batch-mode DRI counterpart. Whether or not the 100% mass recovery method allows for the necessary solvent equilibration within the immediate vicinity of the polymer chain during a chromatographic run, so as to allow for accurate determination of ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> in SEC/DRI experiments, is evaluated here. This is done using a set of three narrow-dispersity linear polystyrene standards covering a 40-fold range in molar mass, dissolved in a 25:75 mix of tetrahydrofuran and <i>N</i>,<i>N-</i>dimethyl formamide. Results are compared to those previously obtained by the batch-mode method and from calculations involving the accurately known molar masses of the polymers and refractive indices of the solvents. The 100% mass recovery method of obtaining ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> values, while of great help for determining the ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> of, e.g., polyelectrolytes, does not appear able to overcome the obstacle of preferential solvation when analyzing macromolecules in a mix of non-isorefractive solvents with dissimilar second virial coefficients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":518,"journal":{"name":"Chromatographia","volume":"88 10","pages":"801 - 805"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10337-025-04438-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absolute Molar Mass Determination in Mixed Solvents. 3. Accuracy of ∂n/∂c Values Obtained by Assuming 100% SEC Mass Recovery\",\"authors\":\"André M. Striegel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10337-025-04438-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accurate values of the specific refractive index increment (∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i>) are essential to the accurate determination of molar mass averages, distributions, and related macromolecular parameters by, among others, size-based separations with online static light scattering and differential refractive index (DRI) detection. Examined here is the 100% mass recovery method of calculating the ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> of dilute macromolecular solutions, when employing mixed solvents in a size-based separation (e.g., size-exclusion chromatography or SEC) with DRI detection. This method has been used successfully in the past for determining the ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> of various polyelectrolytes. It is quicker, generally simpler, and less sample-intensive than its offline, batch-mode DRI counterpart. Whether or not the 100% mass recovery method allows for the necessary solvent equilibration within the immediate vicinity of the polymer chain during a chromatographic run, so as to allow for accurate determination of ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> in SEC/DRI experiments, is evaluated here. This is done using a set of three narrow-dispersity linear polystyrene standards covering a 40-fold range in molar mass, dissolved in a 25:75 mix of tetrahydrofuran and <i>N</i>,<i>N-</i>dimethyl formamide. Results are compared to those previously obtained by the batch-mode method and from calculations involving the accurately known molar masses of the polymers and refractive indices of the solvents. The 100% mass recovery method of obtaining ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> values, while of great help for determining the ∂<i>n</i>/∂<i>c</i> of, e.g., polyelectrolytes, does not appear able to overcome the obstacle of preferential solvation when analyzing macromolecules in a mix of non-isorefractive solvents with dissimilar second virial coefficients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chromatographia\",\"volume\":\"88 10\",\"pages\":\"801 - 805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10337-025-04438-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chromatographia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10337-025-04438-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chromatographia","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10337-025-04438-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Absolute Molar Mass Determination in Mixed Solvents. 3. Accuracy of ∂n/∂c Values Obtained by Assuming 100% SEC Mass Recovery
Accurate values of the specific refractive index increment (∂n/∂c) are essential to the accurate determination of molar mass averages, distributions, and related macromolecular parameters by, among others, size-based separations with online static light scattering and differential refractive index (DRI) detection. Examined here is the 100% mass recovery method of calculating the ∂n/∂c of dilute macromolecular solutions, when employing mixed solvents in a size-based separation (e.g., size-exclusion chromatography or SEC) with DRI detection. This method has been used successfully in the past for determining the ∂n/∂c of various polyelectrolytes. It is quicker, generally simpler, and less sample-intensive than its offline, batch-mode DRI counterpart. Whether or not the 100% mass recovery method allows for the necessary solvent equilibration within the immediate vicinity of the polymer chain during a chromatographic run, so as to allow for accurate determination of ∂n/∂c in SEC/DRI experiments, is evaluated here. This is done using a set of three narrow-dispersity linear polystyrene standards covering a 40-fold range in molar mass, dissolved in a 25:75 mix of tetrahydrofuran and N,N-dimethyl formamide. Results are compared to those previously obtained by the batch-mode method and from calculations involving the accurately known molar masses of the polymers and refractive indices of the solvents. The 100% mass recovery method of obtaining ∂n/∂c values, while of great help for determining the ∂n/∂c of, e.g., polyelectrolytes, does not appear able to overcome the obstacle of preferential solvation when analyzing macromolecules in a mix of non-isorefractive solvents with dissimilar second virial coefficients.
期刊介绍:
Separation sciences, in all their various forms such as chromatography, field-flow fractionation, and electrophoresis, provide some of the most powerful techniques in analytical chemistry and are applied within a number of important application areas, including archaeology, biotechnology, clinical, environmental, food, medical, petroleum, pharmaceutical, polymer and biopolymer research. Beyond serving analytical purposes, separation techniques are also used for preparative and process-scale applications. The scope and power of separation sciences is significantly extended by combination with spectroscopic detection methods (e.g., laser-based approaches, nuclear-magnetic resonance, Raman, chemiluminescence) and particularly, mass spectrometry, to create hyphenated techniques. In addition to exciting new developments in chromatography, such as ultra high-pressure systems, multidimensional separations, and high-temperature approaches, there have also been great advances in hybrid methods combining chromatography and electro-based separations, especially on the micro- and nanoscale. Integrated biological procedures (e.g., enzymatic, immunological, receptor-based assays) can also be part of the overall analytical process.