生成式人工智能占用(GAIA)量表的开发和验证:用于评估用户参与度和利用率的综合测量工具

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Puja Khatri , Harshleen Kaur Duggal , Asha Thomas , Vincenzo Corvello , Ewa Prałat , Atul Shiva
{"title":"生成式人工智能占用(GAIA)量表的开发和验证:用于评估用户参与度和利用率的综合测量工具","authors":"Puja Khatri ,&nbsp;Harshleen Kaur Duggal ,&nbsp;Asha Thomas ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Corvello ,&nbsp;Ewa Prałat ,&nbsp;Atul Shiva","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative Artificial Intelligence Appropriation (GAIA) encapsulates how users adopt Generative Artificial Intelligence tools, adapt them according to their needs, and integrate them into their work. The rapid adoption of generative AI tools has demonstrated their transformative potential to effect significant improvements in the field of business management and change the work habits of their users. Considering the multitude of applicative possibilities offered by the technology, in addition to its nascence, there are significant concerns regarding how the technology can be utilised, necessitating GAIA assessment in the workplace. Existing instruments prove inadequate in providing a comprehensive measurement of GAIA. In response, this research adopts a mixed-method approach, comprising qualitative and quantitative insights from multiple studies. Drawing on multiple samples, this study develops and validates a second-order, reflective-reflective GAIA measure, comprising dimensions of integrative appropriation, adoptive appropriations, customised appropriation, interface appropriation and ethical appropriation. The research encompasses four studies with a distinctive focus on item generation, scale purification, scale refinement and nomological validation. The GAIA scale developed herein offers a robust and comprehensive measure that can be used to explicate, assess, and improve GAIA in the workplace.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 103379"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the generative artificial intelligence appropriation (GAIA) Scale: A comprehensive measurement tool for assessing user engagement and utilisation\",\"authors\":\"Puja Khatri ,&nbsp;Harshleen Kaur Duggal ,&nbsp;Asha Thomas ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Corvello ,&nbsp;Ewa Prałat ,&nbsp;Atul Shiva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Generative Artificial Intelligence Appropriation (GAIA) encapsulates how users adopt Generative Artificial Intelligence tools, adapt them according to their needs, and integrate them into their work. The rapid adoption of generative AI tools has demonstrated their transformative potential to effect significant improvements in the field of business management and change the work habits of their users. Considering the multitude of applicative possibilities offered by the technology, in addition to its nascence, there are significant concerns regarding how the technology can be utilised, necessitating GAIA assessment in the workplace. Existing instruments prove inadequate in providing a comprehensive measurement of GAIA. In response, this research adopts a mixed-method approach, comprising qualitative and quantitative insights from multiple studies. Drawing on multiple samples, this study develops and validates a second-order, reflective-reflective GAIA measure, comprising dimensions of integrative appropriation, adoptive appropriations, customised appropriation, interface appropriation and ethical appropriation. The research encompasses four studies with a distinctive focus on item generation, scale purification, scale refinement and nomological validation. The GAIA scale developed herein offers a robust and comprehensive measure that can be used to explicate, assess, and improve GAIA in the workplace.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225002111\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225002111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能挪用(GAIA)封装了用户如何采用生成式人工智能工具,根据他们的需求进行调整,并将其集成到他们的工作中。生成式人工智能工具的迅速采用已经证明了它们的变革潜力,可以在商业管理领域产生重大改善,并改变用户的工作习惯。考虑到该技术提供的众多应用可能性,除了它的诞生之外,还有关于如何利用该技术的重大关切,需要在工作场所进行GAIA评估。事实证明,现有的仪器不足以提供GAIA的全面测量。因此,本研究采用混合方法,包括多项研究的定性和定量见解。利用多个样本,本研究开发并验证了一种二阶、反思性的GAIA测量方法,包括综合挪用、适应性挪用、定制挪用、界面挪用和伦理挪用等维度。该研究包括四项研究,重点是项目生成、量表纯化、量表改进和法理学验证。本文开发的GAIA量表提供了一个强大而全面的测量方法,可用于解释、评估和改善工作场所的GAIA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of the generative artificial intelligence appropriation (GAIA) Scale: A comprehensive measurement tool for assessing user engagement and utilisation
Generative Artificial Intelligence Appropriation (GAIA) encapsulates how users adopt Generative Artificial Intelligence tools, adapt them according to their needs, and integrate them into their work. The rapid adoption of generative AI tools has demonstrated their transformative potential to effect significant improvements in the field of business management and change the work habits of their users. Considering the multitude of applicative possibilities offered by the technology, in addition to its nascence, there are significant concerns regarding how the technology can be utilised, necessitating GAIA assessment in the workplace. Existing instruments prove inadequate in providing a comprehensive measurement of GAIA. In response, this research adopts a mixed-method approach, comprising qualitative and quantitative insights from multiple studies. Drawing on multiple samples, this study develops and validates a second-order, reflective-reflective GAIA measure, comprising dimensions of integrative appropriation, adoptive appropriations, customised appropriation, interface appropriation and ethical appropriation. The research encompasses four studies with a distinctive focus on item generation, scale purification, scale refinement and nomological validation. The GAIA scale developed herein offers a robust and comprehensive measure that can be used to explicate, assess, and improve GAIA in the workplace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信