{"title":"了解英语学生作家使用聊天语言时的元认知意识","authors":"Mark Feng Teng","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding metacognition in using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for academic writing is a research gap. This mixed-method study of combining survey data with interview insights aims to bridge this gap of understanding EFL learners' metacognitive awareness in utilizing ChatGPT for EFL academic writing feedback and their metacognitive practices and experiences in using ChatGPT to obtain feedback for writing. The research involved 452 EFL undergraduate students enrolled in a semester-long writing course. The quantitative analysis confirmed the validity of the metacognitive awareness scale, providing a robust measure for assessing learners' awareness in using ChatGPT for writing. Complementing these findings, the qualitative analysis of interview data offered a detailed understanding of students' metacognitive awareness. The results revealed varied levels of metacognitive awareness in GenAI use, ranging from simply copying words generated by ChatGPT to effectively leveraging the tool for writing feedback and improvement. These findings underscore the complex interplay between ChatGPT and human writers, emphasizing the need for ethical considerations in its use. The study highlights a need to foster metacognitive awareness to ensure students’ engagement with ChatGPT responsibly, using it as a tool for writing rather than as a substitute for genuine effort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103848"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding EFL student writers’ metacognitive awareness in utilizing ChatGPT\",\"authors\":\"Mark Feng Teng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2025.103848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding metacognition in using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for academic writing is a research gap. This mixed-method study of combining survey data with interview insights aims to bridge this gap of understanding EFL learners' metacognitive awareness in utilizing ChatGPT for EFL academic writing feedback and their metacognitive practices and experiences in using ChatGPT to obtain feedback for writing. The research involved 452 EFL undergraduate students enrolled in a semester-long writing course. The quantitative analysis confirmed the validity of the metacognitive awareness scale, providing a robust measure for assessing learners' awareness in using ChatGPT for writing. Complementing these findings, the qualitative analysis of interview data offered a detailed understanding of students' metacognitive awareness. The results revealed varied levels of metacognitive awareness in GenAI use, ranging from simply copying words generated by ChatGPT to effectively leveraging the tool for writing feedback and improvement. These findings underscore the complex interplay between ChatGPT and human writers, emphasizing the need for ethical considerations in its use. The study highlights a need to foster metacognitive awareness to ensure students’ engagement with ChatGPT responsibly, using it as a tool for writing rather than as a substitute for genuine effort.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25002581\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25002581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding EFL student writers’ metacognitive awareness in utilizing ChatGPT
Understanding metacognition in using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for academic writing is a research gap. This mixed-method study of combining survey data with interview insights aims to bridge this gap of understanding EFL learners' metacognitive awareness in utilizing ChatGPT for EFL academic writing feedback and their metacognitive practices and experiences in using ChatGPT to obtain feedback for writing. The research involved 452 EFL undergraduate students enrolled in a semester-long writing course. The quantitative analysis confirmed the validity of the metacognitive awareness scale, providing a robust measure for assessing learners' awareness in using ChatGPT for writing. Complementing these findings, the qualitative analysis of interview data offered a detailed understanding of students' metacognitive awareness. The results revealed varied levels of metacognitive awareness in GenAI use, ranging from simply copying words generated by ChatGPT to effectively leveraging the tool for writing feedback and improvement. These findings underscore the complex interplay between ChatGPT and human writers, emphasizing the need for ethical considerations in its use. The study highlights a need to foster metacognitive awareness to ensure students’ engagement with ChatGPT responsibly, using it as a tool for writing rather than as a substitute for genuine effort.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.