黄海两种软体动物滨鸟的食性差异和时间分配促进了它们的中途共存

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Furong Bai , He-Bo Peng , Chenjing Huang , Yang Wu , Hui Wang , Haozhan Feng , Mei Guo , Zhengwang Zhang , Weipan Lei , De Chen
{"title":"黄海两种软体动物滨鸟的食性差异和时间分配促进了它们的中途共存","authors":"Furong Bai ,&nbsp;He-Bo Peng ,&nbsp;Chenjing Huang ,&nbsp;Yang Wu ,&nbsp;Hui Wang ,&nbsp;Haozhan Feng ,&nbsp;Mei Guo ,&nbsp;Zhengwang Zhang ,&nbsp;Weipan Lei ,&nbsp;De Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Species coexistence, largely maintained through mechanisms of niche differentiation, is fundamental for sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. For migratory shorebirds, the limited availability of staging sites intensifies interspecific competition, making coexistence mechanisms critical for refueling and survival during migration. This study examined the coexistence mechanisms of two threatened shorebird species, the Great Knot (<em>Calidris tenuirostris</em>) and Red Knot (<em>Calidris canutus</em>), in Nanpu wetland, a key stopover site along the East Asian<img>Australasian Flyway. Using noninvasive DNA metabarcoding of 81 droppings, we identified 32 MOTUs, revealing that both species primarily feed on Bivalvia. The Great Knot exhibited a more diverse diet, with <em>Mactra quadrangularis</em> (FOO = 71.43 %, RRA = 69.41 %) as its primary food source, whereas the Red Knot specializes in feeding on <em>Potamocorbula laevis</em> (FOO = 93.48 %, RRA = 80.15 %). Long-term survey data collected from 2014 to 2024 revealed that the abundance of Great Knots peaked in late April, whereas the number of Red Knots peaked 12.6 days later, in mid-May. These findings highlight how dietary differentiation and temporal partitioning enable the coexistence of these threatened species, offering valuable insights for the development of targeted conservation strategies to support species with specialized diets in adapting to fluctuations in food resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article e03877"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary divergence and temporal partitioning facilitate the stopover coexistence of two molluscivorous shorebird species in the Yellow Sea\",\"authors\":\"Furong Bai ,&nbsp;He-Bo Peng ,&nbsp;Chenjing Huang ,&nbsp;Yang Wu ,&nbsp;Hui Wang ,&nbsp;Haozhan Feng ,&nbsp;Mei Guo ,&nbsp;Zhengwang Zhang ,&nbsp;Weipan Lei ,&nbsp;De Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Species coexistence, largely maintained through mechanisms of niche differentiation, is fundamental for sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. For migratory shorebirds, the limited availability of staging sites intensifies interspecific competition, making coexistence mechanisms critical for refueling and survival during migration. This study examined the coexistence mechanisms of two threatened shorebird species, the Great Knot (<em>Calidris tenuirostris</em>) and Red Knot (<em>Calidris canutus</em>), in Nanpu wetland, a key stopover site along the East Asian<img>Australasian Flyway. Using noninvasive DNA metabarcoding of 81 droppings, we identified 32 MOTUs, revealing that both species primarily feed on Bivalvia. The Great Knot exhibited a more diverse diet, with <em>Mactra quadrangularis</em> (FOO = 71.43 %, RRA = 69.41 %) as its primary food source, whereas the Red Knot specializes in feeding on <em>Potamocorbula laevis</em> (FOO = 93.48 %, RRA = 80.15 %). Long-term survey data collected from 2014 to 2024 revealed that the abundance of Great Knots peaked in late April, whereas the number of Red Knots peaked 12.6 days later, in mid-May. These findings highlight how dietary differentiation and temporal partitioning enable the coexistence of these threatened species, offering valuable insights for the development of targeted conservation strategies to support species with specialized diets in adapting to fluctuations in food resources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article e03877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425004780\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425004780","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物种共存是维持生物多样性和生态系统恢复力的基础,主要通过生态位分化机制来维持。对于候鸟来说,有限的迁徙地点加剧了种间竞争,使得共存机制对迁徙期间的补充和生存至关重要。研究了南浦湿地两种濒危滨鸟——大结(Calidris tenuirostris)和红结(Calidris canutus)的共存机制。南浦湿地是东亚-澳大拉斯鸟迁徙路线的重要中途停留点。通过对81份粪便进行非侵入性DNA元条形码编码,我们鉴定出32个motu,表明这两个物种主要以双壳类动物为食。大结表现出更多样化的饮食,其主要食物来源是Mactra quadrangularis (FOO = 71.43 %,RRA = 69.41 %),而红结则专门以Potamocorbula laevis (FOO = 93.48 %,RRA = 80.15 %)为食。从2014年到2024年收集的长期调查数据显示,大结的数量在4月下旬达到顶峰,而红结的数量在12.6天后的5月中旬达到顶峰。这些发现强调了饮食差异和时间分配如何使这些受威胁物种能够共存,为制定有针对性的保护策略提供了有价值的见解,以支持具有特殊饮食的物种适应食物资源的波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dietary divergence and temporal partitioning facilitate the stopover coexistence of two molluscivorous shorebird species in the Yellow Sea
Species coexistence, largely maintained through mechanisms of niche differentiation, is fundamental for sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. For migratory shorebirds, the limited availability of staging sites intensifies interspecific competition, making coexistence mechanisms critical for refueling and survival during migration. This study examined the coexistence mechanisms of two threatened shorebird species, the Great Knot (Calidris tenuirostris) and Red Knot (Calidris canutus), in Nanpu wetland, a key stopover site along the East AsianAustralasian Flyway. Using noninvasive DNA metabarcoding of 81 droppings, we identified 32 MOTUs, revealing that both species primarily feed on Bivalvia. The Great Knot exhibited a more diverse diet, with Mactra quadrangularis (FOO = 71.43 %, RRA = 69.41 %) as its primary food source, whereas the Red Knot specializes in feeding on Potamocorbula laevis (FOO = 93.48 %, RRA = 80.15 %). Long-term survey data collected from 2014 to 2024 revealed that the abundance of Great Knots peaked in late April, whereas the number of Red Knots peaked 12.6 days later, in mid-May. These findings highlight how dietary differentiation and temporal partitioning enable the coexistence of these threatened species, offering valuable insights for the development of targeted conservation strategies to support species with specialized diets in adapting to fluctuations in food resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信