影响急性主动脉夹层死亡率的因素:一项多中心队列研究

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Joshua G. Kovoor , John M. Glynatsis , Nikolaos C. Glynatsis , Domenico Perrotta , Elyssa Chan , Timothy Daniell , Stephen Bacchi , Brandon Stretton , Daksh Tyagi , Joseph N. Hewitt , Angelyn L.W. Khong , Diana U. Siriwardena , David X.H. Ling , Christopher D. Ovenden , Rohan Arasu , Jonathan Henry W. Jacobsen , Suzanne Edwards , Matthew Marshall-Webb , Pramesh Kovoor , Benjamin A.J. Reddi , Aashray K. Gupta
{"title":"影响急性主动脉夹层死亡率的因素:一项多中心队列研究","authors":"Joshua G. Kovoor ,&nbsp;John M. Glynatsis ,&nbsp;Nikolaos C. Glynatsis ,&nbsp;Domenico Perrotta ,&nbsp;Elyssa Chan ,&nbsp;Timothy Daniell ,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi ,&nbsp;Brandon Stretton ,&nbsp;Daksh Tyagi ,&nbsp;Joseph N. Hewitt ,&nbsp;Angelyn L.W. Khong ,&nbsp;Diana U. Siriwardena ,&nbsp;David X.H. Ling ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Ovenden ,&nbsp;Rohan Arasu ,&nbsp;Jonathan Henry W. Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Suzanne Edwards ,&nbsp;Matthew Marshall-Webb ,&nbsp;Pramesh Kovoor ,&nbsp;Benjamin A.J. Reddi ,&nbsp;Aashray K. Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is an emergency associated with high mortality. Timely diagnosis is challenging, and delays may affect patient outcomes. We aimed to identify clinical and temporal factors associated with mortality after AAD.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study across four tertiary hospitals of type A and type B AADs diagnosed over a 20-year period. The outcomes of the study were in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and mid-term (6-month) mortality. Univariate linear and bivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between mortality and demographic and clinical factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 149 AAD patients. Of these, 103 (69.1 %) were Stanford type A and 46 (30.9 %) Stanford type B. In-hospital mortality was 29.1 % (<em>n</em> = 30) for type A vs 10.9 % (<em>n</em> = 5) for type B. For type A patients, every one-year increase in age increased odds of in-hospital mortality by 4 % (<em>p</em> = 0.0076), and odds of in-hospital mortality were 10.9 times greater with conservative management than surgical (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Patients with type A dissection had odds of in-hospital mortality 3.0 times greater than type B (<em>p</em> = 0.0005). 30-day mortality rate was 29.1 % (<em>n</em> = 30) for type A dissection vs 10.9 % (<em>n</em> = 5) for type B. 6-month mortality rate was 30.1 % (<em>n</em> = 31) for type A dissection vs 10.9 % (<em>n</em> = 5) for type B. Predictors of 30-day and 6-month mortality were similar to those of in-hospital mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Even with tertiary care AAD carries a high burden of mortality. Those with type A dissections, increased age, and non-surgical management are at an increased risk of mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting acute aortic dissection mortality: A multicentre cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Joshua G. Kovoor ,&nbsp;John M. Glynatsis ,&nbsp;Nikolaos C. Glynatsis ,&nbsp;Domenico Perrotta ,&nbsp;Elyssa Chan ,&nbsp;Timothy Daniell ,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi ,&nbsp;Brandon Stretton ,&nbsp;Daksh Tyagi ,&nbsp;Joseph N. Hewitt ,&nbsp;Angelyn L.W. Khong ,&nbsp;Diana U. Siriwardena ,&nbsp;David X.H. Ling ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Ovenden ,&nbsp;Rohan Arasu ,&nbsp;Jonathan Henry W. Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Suzanne Edwards ,&nbsp;Matthew Marshall-Webb ,&nbsp;Pramesh Kovoor ,&nbsp;Benjamin A.J. Reddi ,&nbsp;Aashray K. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is an emergency associated with high mortality. Timely diagnosis is challenging, and delays may affect patient outcomes. We aimed to identify clinical and temporal factors associated with mortality after AAD.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study across four tertiary hospitals of type A and type B AADs diagnosed over a 20-year period. The outcomes of the study were in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and mid-term (6-month) mortality. Univariate linear and bivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between mortality and demographic and clinical factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 149 AAD patients. Of these, 103 (69.1 %) were Stanford type A and 46 (30.9 %) Stanford type B. In-hospital mortality was 29.1 % (<em>n</em> = 30) for type A vs 10.9 % (<em>n</em> = 5) for type B. For type A patients, every one-year increase in age increased odds of in-hospital mortality by 4 % (<em>p</em> = 0.0076), and odds of in-hospital mortality were 10.9 times greater with conservative management than surgical (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Patients with type A dissection had odds of in-hospital mortality 3.0 times greater than type B (<em>p</em> = 0.0005). 30-day mortality rate was 29.1 % (<em>n</em> = 30) for type A dissection vs 10.9 % (<em>n</em> = 5) for type B. 6-month mortality rate was 30.1 % (<em>n</em> = 31) for type A dissection vs 10.9 % (<em>n</em> = 5) for type B. Predictors of 30-day and 6-month mortality were similar to those of in-hospital mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Even with tertiary care AAD carries a high burden of mortality. Those with type A dissections, increased age, and non-surgical management are at an increased risk of mortality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262025000403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262025000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性主动脉夹层(AAD)是一种高死亡率的急症。及时诊断具有挑战性,延误可能会影响患者的预后。我们的目的是确定与AAD后死亡率相关的临床和时间因素。方法:我们对四家三级医院20年间诊断为a型和B型AADs的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。研究结果为住院死亡率、30天死亡率和中期(6个月)死亡率。进行单因素线性和双因素logistic回归分析,以评估死亡率与人口统计学和临床因素之间的关系。结果纳入149例AAD患者。其中,103例(69.1%)为斯坦福A型,46例(30.9%)为斯坦福b型。A型患者的住院死亡率为29.1% (n = 30), b型患者为10.9% (n = 5)。对于A型患者,年龄每增加一年,住院死亡率增加4% (p = 0.0076),保守治疗的住院死亡率是手术治疗的10.9倍(p < 0.0001)。A型夹层患者的住院死亡率是B型夹层患者的3.0倍(p = 0.0005)。A型夹层30天死亡率为29.1% (n = 30), b型为10.9% (n = 5)。6个月死亡率为30.1% (n = 31), b型为10.9% (n = 5)。30天和6个月死亡率的预测指标与院内死亡率相似。结论:即使接受三级治疗,AAD的死亡率也很高。A型夹层、年龄增长和非手术治疗的患者死亡风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting acute aortic dissection mortality: A multicentre cohort study

Background

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is an emergency associated with high mortality. Timely diagnosis is challenging, and delays may affect patient outcomes. We aimed to identify clinical and temporal factors associated with mortality after AAD.

Methodology

We performed a retrospective cohort study across four tertiary hospitals of type A and type B AADs diagnosed over a 20-year period. The outcomes of the study were in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and mid-term (6-month) mortality. Univariate linear and bivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between mortality and demographic and clinical factors.

Results

The study included 149 AAD patients. Of these, 103 (69.1 %) were Stanford type A and 46 (30.9 %) Stanford type B. In-hospital mortality was 29.1 % (n = 30) for type A vs 10.9 % (n = 5) for type B. For type A patients, every one-year increase in age increased odds of in-hospital mortality by 4 % (p = 0.0076), and odds of in-hospital mortality were 10.9 times greater with conservative management than surgical (p < 0.0001). Patients with type A dissection had odds of in-hospital mortality 3.0 times greater than type B (p = 0.0005). 30-day mortality rate was 29.1 % (n = 30) for type A dissection vs 10.9 % (n = 5) for type B. 6-month mortality rate was 30.1 % (n = 31) for type A dissection vs 10.9 % (n = 5) for type B. Predictors of 30-day and 6-month mortality were similar to those of in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Even with tertiary care AAD carries a high burden of mortality. Those with type A dissections, increased age, and non-surgical management are at an increased risk of mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信