{"title":"双翅目和异翅目昆虫的运动能力:科学计量学综述","authors":"Laís Rodrigues Santos Navarro , Marciel Elio Rodrigues , Camila Righetto Cassano","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2025.104125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individual movement is a central process for the long-term viability of species, as it allows access to key resources for survival and reproduction. Movement is closely associated with the response of species to landscape changes, with more vagile species typically being less affected. In Odonata, movement capacity is strongly related to body morphology, such as wing and body size. In general, species in the suborder Anisoptera have larger wings and bodies than species in the suborder Zygoptera and are likely to move over greater distances. In this paper, we synthesize knowledge about the movement capacity of adult Odonata based on a literature review. We also assess whether travel distances differ between the suborders (Anisoptera and Zygoptera), and whether these movements are consistent with the spatial scales used in landscape studies (i.e., the spatial extent at which landscape metrics are measured). We found 34 articles published between 1978 and 2025, from which we obtained movement data for 32 species (17 Anisoptera and 15 Zygoptera). Most studies were developed in the northern hemisphere, with an increase since the early 2000s. Individual movement is usually assessed by mark-recapture, but telemetry has been applied for large-bodied species. Despite the literature suggesting a higher movement capacity in Anisoptera than in Zygoptera, we observed no significant difference between the two suborders. Our results showed a median distance of 731.5 m (range: 16 to 1790 m) for Zygoptera and 224 m (range: 89 to 1910 m) for Anisoptera. Landscape studies were rare, and some spatial scales used were small compared to the maximum travel capacity of Odonata. Based on these results, we emphasize the scarcity of data on dragonfly movements, especially in tropical regions. Understanding these factors is essential to identify needs and define conservation strategies, especially for species most sensitive to anthropogenic changes, threatened and low movement capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55564,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Movement capacity in zygoptera and anisoptera (Odonata): a scientometric review\",\"authors\":\"Laís Rodrigues Santos Navarro , Marciel Elio Rodrigues , Camila Righetto Cassano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actao.2025.104125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Individual movement is a central process for the long-term viability of species, as it allows access to key resources for survival and reproduction. Movement is closely associated with the response of species to landscape changes, with more vagile species typically being less affected. In Odonata, movement capacity is strongly related to body morphology, such as wing and body size. In general, species in the suborder Anisoptera have larger wings and bodies than species in the suborder Zygoptera and are likely to move over greater distances. In this paper, we synthesize knowledge about the movement capacity of adult Odonata based on a literature review. We also assess whether travel distances differ between the suborders (Anisoptera and Zygoptera), and whether these movements are consistent with the spatial scales used in landscape studies (i.e., the spatial extent at which landscape metrics are measured). We found 34 articles published between 1978 and 2025, from which we obtained movement data for 32 species (17 Anisoptera and 15 Zygoptera). Most studies were developed in the northern hemisphere, with an increase since the early 2000s. Individual movement is usually assessed by mark-recapture, but telemetry has been applied for large-bodied species. Despite the literature suggesting a higher movement capacity in Anisoptera than in Zygoptera, we observed no significant difference between the two suborders. Our results showed a median distance of 731.5 m (range: 16 to 1790 m) for Zygoptera and 224 m (range: 89 to 1910 m) for Anisoptera. Landscape studies were rare, and some spatial scales used were small compared to the maximum travel capacity of Odonata. Based on these results, we emphasize the scarcity of data on dragonfly movements, especially in tropical regions. Understanding these factors is essential to identify needs and define conservation strategies, especially for species most sensitive to anthropogenic changes, threatened and low movement capacity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X25000694\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X25000694","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Movement capacity in zygoptera and anisoptera (Odonata): a scientometric review
Individual movement is a central process for the long-term viability of species, as it allows access to key resources for survival and reproduction. Movement is closely associated with the response of species to landscape changes, with more vagile species typically being less affected. In Odonata, movement capacity is strongly related to body morphology, such as wing and body size. In general, species in the suborder Anisoptera have larger wings and bodies than species in the suborder Zygoptera and are likely to move over greater distances. In this paper, we synthesize knowledge about the movement capacity of adult Odonata based on a literature review. We also assess whether travel distances differ between the suborders (Anisoptera and Zygoptera), and whether these movements are consistent with the spatial scales used in landscape studies (i.e., the spatial extent at which landscape metrics are measured). We found 34 articles published between 1978 and 2025, from which we obtained movement data for 32 species (17 Anisoptera and 15 Zygoptera). Most studies were developed in the northern hemisphere, with an increase since the early 2000s. Individual movement is usually assessed by mark-recapture, but telemetry has been applied for large-bodied species. Despite the literature suggesting a higher movement capacity in Anisoptera than in Zygoptera, we observed no significant difference between the two suborders. Our results showed a median distance of 731.5 m (range: 16 to 1790 m) for Zygoptera and 224 m (range: 89 to 1910 m) for Anisoptera. Landscape studies were rare, and some spatial scales used were small compared to the maximum travel capacity of Odonata. Based on these results, we emphasize the scarcity of data on dragonfly movements, especially in tropical regions. Understanding these factors is essential to identify needs and define conservation strategies, especially for species most sensitive to anthropogenic changes, threatened and low movement capacity.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oecologica is venue for the publication of original research articles in ecology. We encourage studies in all areas of ecology, including ecosystem ecology, community ecology, population ecology, conservation ecology and evolutionary ecology. There is no bias with respect to taxon, biome or geographic area. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome, but combinations are particularly sought. Priority is given to papers based on explicitly stated hypotheses. Acta Oecologica also accepts review papers.