A.G. Moreira , C.S.L. de Carvalho , I.M. Gomide , I.K. Umezu , A.L. Costa
{"title":"CANFLEX燃料束CFD分析:不同级别建模细节的评估","authors":"A.G. Moreira , C.S.L. de Carvalho , I.M. Gomide , I.K. Umezu , A.L. Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear energy plays a key role in sustainable development, with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations enhancing reactor safety and performance. In CANDU reactors, accurate fuel bundle modeling is crucial for reliable thermal-hydraulic analysis. While previous studies have investigated 37-rod and CANFLEX bundles, research on the 43-rod CANFLEX bundle in an Advanced CANDU Reactor-700 (ACR-700) remains limited, particularly using intermediate-scale modeling. This study addresses this gap by evaluating two CFD models in the ACR-700. The Porous Model treats the fuel bundle as a porous medium and a porous jump condition is applied in the transition between regions. The Rod Model represents the coolant flow around a simplified fuel bundle with no connecting pads, with end-plates also treated as porous jumps to reduce computational cost. Steady-state simulations were conducted in ANSYS R19.3 using <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>ω</mi></mrow></math></span> SST turbulence model. The results indicate that the Porous Model captures global pressure drop and coolant temperature evolution while maintaining low computational cost. The Rod Model provides three-dimensional flow and thermal contours, capturing local effects while preserving agreement with design data. Both models showed mesh convergence, with Grid Convergence Index (GCI) analysis confirming the reliability of the Rod Model’s pressure predictions, that showed good agreement with experimental data, serving as an initial validation of the model’s accuracy. The findings contribute to the development of modeling strategies for CANDU reactors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 106056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CANFLEX fuel bundle CFD analysis: Evaluation of different levels of modeling detailing\",\"authors\":\"A.G. Moreira , C.S.L. de Carvalho , I.M. Gomide , I.K. Umezu , A.L. Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nuclear energy plays a key role in sustainable development, with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations enhancing reactor safety and performance. In CANDU reactors, accurate fuel bundle modeling is crucial for reliable thermal-hydraulic analysis. While previous studies have investigated 37-rod and CANFLEX bundles, research on the 43-rod CANFLEX bundle in an Advanced CANDU Reactor-700 (ACR-700) remains limited, particularly using intermediate-scale modeling. This study addresses this gap by evaluating two CFD models in the ACR-700. The Porous Model treats the fuel bundle as a porous medium and a porous jump condition is applied in the transition between regions. The Rod Model represents the coolant flow around a simplified fuel bundle with no connecting pads, with end-plates also treated as porous jumps to reduce computational cost. Steady-state simulations were conducted in ANSYS R19.3 using <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>ω</mi></mrow></math></span> SST turbulence model. The results indicate that the Porous Model captures global pressure drop and coolant temperature evolution while maintaining low computational cost. The Rod Model provides three-dimensional flow and thermal contours, capturing local effects while preserving agreement with design data. Both models showed mesh convergence, with Grid Convergence Index (GCI) analysis confirming the reliability of the Rod Model’s pressure predictions, that showed good agreement with experimental data, serving as an initial validation of the model’s accuracy. The findings contribute to the development of modeling strategies for CANDU reactors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025004548\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025004548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
CANFLEX fuel bundle CFD analysis: Evaluation of different levels of modeling detailing
Nuclear energy plays a key role in sustainable development, with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations enhancing reactor safety and performance. In CANDU reactors, accurate fuel bundle modeling is crucial for reliable thermal-hydraulic analysis. While previous studies have investigated 37-rod and CANFLEX bundles, research on the 43-rod CANFLEX bundle in an Advanced CANDU Reactor-700 (ACR-700) remains limited, particularly using intermediate-scale modeling. This study addresses this gap by evaluating two CFD models in the ACR-700. The Porous Model treats the fuel bundle as a porous medium and a porous jump condition is applied in the transition between regions. The Rod Model represents the coolant flow around a simplified fuel bundle with no connecting pads, with end-plates also treated as porous jumps to reduce computational cost. Steady-state simulations were conducted in ANSYS R19.3 using SST turbulence model. The results indicate that the Porous Model captures global pressure drop and coolant temperature evolution while maintaining low computational cost. The Rod Model provides three-dimensional flow and thermal contours, capturing local effects while preserving agreement with design data. Both models showed mesh convergence, with Grid Convergence Index (GCI) analysis confirming the reliability of the Rod Model’s pressure predictions, that showed good agreement with experimental data, serving as an initial validation of the model’s accuracy. The findings contribute to the development of modeling strategies for CANDU reactors.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.