CANFLEX燃料束CFD分析:不同级别建模细节的评估

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
A.G. Moreira , C.S.L. de Carvalho , I.M. Gomide , I.K. Umezu , A.L. Costa
{"title":"CANFLEX燃料束CFD分析:不同级别建模细节的评估","authors":"A.G. Moreira ,&nbsp;C.S.L. de Carvalho ,&nbsp;I.M. Gomide ,&nbsp;I.K. Umezu ,&nbsp;A.L. Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear energy plays a key role in sustainable development, with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations enhancing reactor safety and performance. In CANDU reactors, accurate fuel bundle modeling is crucial for reliable thermal-hydraulic analysis. While previous studies have investigated 37-rod and CANFLEX bundles, research on the 43-rod CANFLEX bundle in an Advanced CANDU Reactor-700 (ACR-700) remains limited, particularly using intermediate-scale modeling. This study addresses this gap by evaluating two CFD models in the ACR-700. The Porous Model treats the fuel bundle as a porous medium and a porous jump condition is applied in the transition between regions. The Rod Model represents the coolant flow around a simplified fuel bundle with no connecting pads, with end-plates also treated as porous jumps to reduce computational cost. Steady-state simulations were conducted in ANSYS R19.3 using <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>ω</mi></mrow></math></span> SST turbulence model. The results indicate that the Porous Model captures global pressure drop and coolant temperature evolution while maintaining low computational cost. The Rod Model provides three-dimensional flow and thermal contours, capturing local effects while preserving agreement with design data. Both models showed mesh convergence, with Grid Convergence Index (GCI) analysis confirming the reliability of the Rod Model’s pressure predictions, that showed good agreement with experimental data, serving as an initial validation of the model’s accuracy. The findings contribute to the development of modeling strategies for CANDU reactors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 106056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CANFLEX fuel bundle CFD analysis: Evaluation of different levels of modeling detailing\",\"authors\":\"A.G. Moreira ,&nbsp;C.S.L. de Carvalho ,&nbsp;I.M. Gomide ,&nbsp;I.K. Umezu ,&nbsp;A.L. Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nuclear energy plays a key role in sustainable development, with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations enhancing reactor safety and performance. In CANDU reactors, accurate fuel bundle modeling is crucial for reliable thermal-hydraulic analysis. While previous studies have investigated 37-rod and CANFLEX bundles, research on the 43-rod CANFLEX bundle in an Advanced CANDU Reactor-700 (ACR-700) remains limited, particularly using intermediate-scale modeling. This study addresses this gap by evaluating two CFD models in the ACR-700. The Porous Model treats the fuel bundle as a porous medium and a porous jump condition is applied in the transition between regions. The Rod Model represents the coolant flow around a simplified fuel bundle with no connecting pads, with end-plates also treated as porous jumps to reduce computational cost. Steady-state simulations were conducted in ANSYS R19.3 using <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>ω</mi></mrow></math></span> SST turbulence model. The results indicate that the Porous Model captures global pressure drop and coolant temperature evolution while maintaining low computational cost. The Rod Model provides three-dimensional flow and thermal contours, capturing local effects while preserving agreement with design data. Both models showed mesh convergence, with Grid Convergence Index (GCI) analysis confirming the reliability of the Rod Model’s pressure predictions, that showed good agreement with experimental data, serving as an initial validation of the model’s accuracy. The findings contribute to the development of modeling strategies for CANDU reactors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025004548\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025004548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核能在可持续发展中发挥着关键作用,计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟提高了反应堆的安全性和性能。在CANDU反应堆中,精确的燃料束建模对于可靠的热工分析至关重要。虽然之前的研究已经研究了37棒和CANFLEX束,但在Advanced CANDU Reactor-700 (ACR-700)中对43棒CANFLEX束的研究仍然有限,特别是使用中等规模的建模。本研究通过评估ACR-700中的两种CFD模型来解决这一差距。多孔模型将燃料束视为多孔介质,在区域间的过渡中采用多孔跳变条件。棒模型代表了一个简化的燃料束周围的冷却剂流动,没有连接垫,端板也被处理为多孔跳跃,以减少计算成本。采用k−ω海温湍流模型在ANSYS R19.3中进行稳态模拟。结果表明,多孔模型在保持较低的计算成本的同时,能够捕捉到整体压降和冷却剂温度的变化。杆模型提供三维流动和热轮廓,捕捉局部效应,同时保持与设计数据的一致性。两种模型均具有网格收敛性,网格收敛指数(GCI)分析证实了杆模型压力预测的可靠性,与实验数据吻合良好,初步验证了模型的准确性。这些发现有助于CANDU反应堆建模策略的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CANFLEX fuel bundle CFD analysis: Evaluation of different levels of modeling detailing
Nuclear energy plays a key role in sustainable development, with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations enhancing reactor safety and performance. In CANDU reactors, accurate fuel bundle modeling is crucial for reliable thermal-hydraulic analysis. While previous studies have investigated 37-rod and CANFLEX bundles, research on the 43-rod CANFLEX bundle in an Advanced CANDU Reactor-700 (ACR-700) remains limited, particularly using intermediate-scale modeling. This study addresses this gap by evaluating two CFD models in the ACR-700. The Porous Model treats the fuel bundle as a porous medium and a porous jump condition is applied in the transition between regions. The Rod Model represents the coolant flow around a simplified fuel bundle with no connecting pads, with end-plates also treated as porous jumps to reduce computational cost. Steady-state simulations were conducted in ANSYS R19.3 using kω SST turbulence model. The results indicate that the Porous Model captures global pressure drop and coolant temperature evolution while maintaining low computational cost. The Rod Model provides three-dimensional flow and thermal contours, capturing local effects while preserving agreement with design data. Both models showed mesh convergence, with Grid Convergence Index (GCI) analysis confirming the reliability of the Rod Model’s pressure predictions, that showed good agreement with experimental data, serving as an initial validation of the model’s accuracy. The findings contribute to the development of modeling strategies for CANDU reactors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信