寻求外部认可还是追求内部满足:社交媒体中社会比较对数字绿色意愿的影响机制

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zhiping Hou , Benyue Liu , Yong Li , Shengxiang She
{"title":"寻求外部认可还是追求内部满足:社交媒体中社会比较对数字绿色意愿的影响机制","authors":"Zhiping Hou ,&nbsp;Benyue Liu ,&nbsp;Yong Li ,&nbsp;Shengxiang She","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the proliferation of social media, digital green behavior has increasingly become an important means of environmental communication. However, the mechanisms behind individuals' motivations to showcase green behavior on social media and their subsequent behavioral impacts have not been systematically explored. This study focuses on the formation and transformation process of digital green intention in the social media environment, developing a two-stage theoretical model and conducting three experiments. The findings are as follows (1) Upward (vs. downward): social comparison more readily stimulates externally recognition-oriented (vs. internally satisfaction-oriented) digital green intention. (2) Social norm perception significantly moderates the relationship between social comparison and digital green intention (3) Externally recognition-oriented (vs. internally satisfaction-oriented). digital green intention more effectively promotes conspicuous (vs. altruistic) prosocial behavior. (4) Green self-efficacy plays a significant mediating role in the path through which digital green intention influences altruistic prosocial behavior, but the mediating effect is not significant in the path leading to conspicuous prosocial behavior. (5) Social norm perception moderates the relationship between digital green intention and conspicuous prosocial behavior, but the moderating effect is not significant in the path affecting altruistic prosocial behavior. This study extends the theoretical boundary of digital green behavior research and provides differentiated governance insights for optimizing social media platform designs, formulating green communication strategies, and implementing environmental policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102789"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeking external recognition or pursuing internal satisfaction: The mechanism of social comparison in social media on digital green intention\",\"authors\":\"Zhiping Hou ,&nbsp;Benyue Liu ,&nbsp;Yong Li ,&nbsp;Shengxiang She\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the proliferation of social media, digital green behavior has increasingly become an important means of environmental communication. However, the mechanisms behind individuals' motivations to showcase green behavior on social media and their subsequent behavioral impacts have not been systematically explored. This study focuses on the formation and transformation process of digital green intention in the social media environment, developing a two-stage theoretical model and conducting three experiments. The findings are as follows (1) Upward (vs. downward): social comparison more readily stimulates externally recognition-oriented (vs. internally satisfaction-oriented) digital green intention. (2) Social norm perception significantly moderates the relationship between social comparison and digital green intention (3) Externally recognition-oriented (vs. internally satisfaction-oriented). digital green intention more effectively promotes conspicuous (vs. altruistic) prosocial behavior. (4) Green self-efficacy plays a significant mediating role in the path through which digital green intention influences altruistic prosocial behavior, but the mediating effect is not significant in the path leading to conspicuous prosocial behavior. (5) Social norm perception moderates the relationship between digital green intention and conspicuous prosocial behavior, but the moderating effect is not significant in the path affecting altruistic prosocial behavior. This study extends the theoretical boundary of digital green behavior research and provides differentiated governance insights for optimizing social media platform designs, formulating green communication strategies, and implementing environmental policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002725\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002725","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着社交媒体的普及,数字绿色行为日益成为环境传播的重要手段。然而,个人在社交媒体上展示绿色行为的动机及其随后的行为影响背后的机制尚未得到系统的探讨。本研究着眼于社交媒体环境下数字绿色意向的形成和转化过程,建立了两阶段理论模型,并进行了三次实验。研究发现:(1)向上(相对于向下):社会比较更容易激发外部认可导向(相对于内部满意导向)的数字绿色意愿。(2)社会规范知觉显著调节社会比较与数字绿色意向之间的关系(3)外部认可导向(vs.内部满意导向)。数字绿色意向更有效地促进了炫耀性(相对于利他性)亲社会行为。(4)绿色自我效能感在数字绿色意愿影响利他性亲社会行为的路径中起显著中介作用,但在导致显著性亲社会行为的路径中中介作用不显著。(5)社会规范知觉调节数字绿色意愿与显著性亲社会行为的关系,但在影响利他性亲社会行为的路径上调节作用不显著。本研究拓展了数字绿色行为研究的理论边界,为优化社交媒体平台设计、制定绿色传播策略和实施环境政策提供了差异化的治理见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seeking external recognition or pursuing internal satisfaction: The mechanism of social comparison in social media on digital green intention
With the proliferation of social media, digital green behavior has increasingly become an important means of environmental communication. However, the mechanisms behind individuals' motivations to showcase green behavior on social media and their subsequent behavioral impacts have not been systematically explored. This study focuses on the formation and transformation process of digital green intention in the social media environment, developing a two-stage theoretical model and conducting three experiments. The findings are as follows (1) Upward (vs. downward): social comparison more readily stimulates externally recognition-oriented (vs. internally satisfaction-oriented) digital green intention. (2) Social norm perception significantly moderates the relationship between social comparison and digital green intention (3) Externally recognition-oriented (vs. internally satisfaction-oriented). digital green intention more effectively promotes conspicuous (vs. altruistic) prosocial behavior. (4) Green self-efficacy plays a significant mediating role in the path through which digital green intention influences altruistic prosocial behavior, but the mediating effect is not significant in the path leading to conspicuous prosocial behavior. (5) Social norm perception moderates the relationship between digital green intention and conspicuous prosocial behavior, but the moderating effect is not significant in the path affecting altruistic prosocial behavior. This study extends the theoretical boundary of digital green behavior research and provides differentiated governance insights for optimizing social media platform designs, formulating green communication strategies, and implementing environmental policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信