{"title":"国内和美国经济政策的不确定性是否会增加中国宏观金融风险的连通性?","authors":"Chunyang Hu , Yang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While economic policy uncertainty (EPU) has been shown to increase systemic risk within financial institutions, there is limited knowledge about the role of EPU in influencing the risk connectedness (spillover) between financial markets and macroeconomic sectors. This paper provides a systematic analysis and comparison of how China’s macro-financial risk connectedness in responds to an increase in domestic and US EPU. The results suggest that: (i) an increase in domestic EPU leads to a significant rise in macro-financial total risk connectedness for at least two years; (ii) specifically, the increase in domestic EPU causes financial markets to act more as transmitters of risk, while macroeconomic sectors act more as receivers of risk; (iii) categorical EPUs exhibit a similar pattern to the overall EPU, with China’s monetary policy uncertainty (MPU) having the largest effects; (iv) US EPU also increases China’s macro-financial risk connectedness, though the impact is lower in magnitude and shorter in duration; (v) however, during the US–China trade conflict, a rise in US TPU causes a more significant and persistent increase in China’s macro-financial risk connectedness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 103138"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do domestic and US economic policy uncertainty increase China’s macro-financial risk connectedness?\",\"authors\":\"Chunyang Hu , Yang Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While economic policy uncertainty (EPU) has been shown to increase systemic risk within financial institutions, there is limited knowledge about the role of EPU in influencing the risk connectedness (spillover) between financial markets and macroeconomic sectors. This paper provides a systematic analysis and comparison of how China’s macro-financial risk connectedness in responds to an increase in domestic and US EPU. The results suggest that: (i) an increase in domestic EPU leads to a significant rise in macro-financial total risk connectedness for at least two years; (ii) specifically, the increase in domestic EPU causes financial markets to act more as transmitters of risk, while macroeconomic sectors act more as receivers of risk; (iii) categorical EPUs exhibit a similar pattern to the overall EPU, with China’s monetary policy uncertainty (MPU) having the largest effects; (iv) US EPU also increases China’s macro-financial risk connectedness, though the impact is lower in magnitude and shorter in duration; (v) however, during the US–China trade conflict, a rise in US TPU causes a more significant and persistent increase in China’s macro-financial risk connectedness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003940\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do domestic and US economic policy uncertainty increase China’s macro-financial risk connectedness?
While economic policy uncertainty (EPU) has been shown to increase systemic risk within financial institutions, there is limited knowledge about the role of EPU in influencing the risk connectedness (spillover) between financial markets and macroeconomic sectors. This paper provides a systematic analysis and comparison of how China’s macro-financial risk connectedness in responds to an increase in domestic and US EPU. The results suggest that: (i) an increase in domestic EPU leads to a significant rise in macro-financial total risk connectedness for at least two years; (ii) specifically, the increase in domestic EPU causes financial markets to act more as transmitters of risk, while macroeconomic sectors act more as receivers of risk; (iii) categorical EPUs exhibit a similar pattern to the overall EPU, with China’s monetary policy uncertainty (MPU) having the largest effects; (iv) US EPU also increases China’s macro-financial risk connectedness, though the impact is lower in magnitude and shorter in duration; (v) however, during the US–China trade conflict, a rise in US TPU causes a more significant and persistent increase in China’s macro-financial risk connectedness.
期刊介绍:
Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance