{"title":"基于模糊逻辑的半干旱草地放牧能力模拟提高可持续性","authors":"Azin Zarei , Ali Goharnejad , Pejman Tahmasebi , Hamid Mohammadi Nasrabadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of grazing capacity is critical for sustainable rangeland management, yet remains challenging in semi-arid systems due to spatial heterogeneity and data uncertainty. This study applied an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) to predict grazing capacity in semi-steppe rangelands of northwest Iran and eastern Turkey. Four ecologically relevant inputs—slope, forage production, water supply distance, and soil resistance to erosion—were used as predictors. Forage production was derived from NDVI–biomass calibration (R2 = 0.72, RMSE = 58.3 kg/ha), and unsuitable areas (slope > 60 %, biomass < 50 kg/ha) were excluded. The ANFIS model was implemented in MATLAB using Gaussian membership functions (three per input), a cluster radius of 0.35, and 16 fuzzy rules. Model evaluation showed strong performance on training data (NRMSE = 4.7 %) but a substantially higher error on testing data (NRMSE = 19.2 %), indicating potential overfitting and spatial heterogeneity effects. Spatial outputs classified the study area into five grazing capacity categories, with higher capacities in western and southern zones and lower capacities in central regions. Comparison with vegetation-type classifications highlighted differences arising from ANFIS’s integration of multiple drivers beyond forage biomass. While results demonstrate the promise of neuro-fuzzy approaches for handling uncertain datasets and capturing spatial variability, we emphasize that outputs should be interpreted as indicative patterns rather than prescriptive management recommendations. Future work should integrate field validation, benchmark against simpler models, and incorporate dynamic factors such as drought and livestock species differences to enhance ecological realism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 127096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing sustainability in semi-arid rangelands through grazing capacity simulation using fuzzy logic\",\"authors\":\"Azin Zarei , Ali Goharnejad , Pejman Tahmasebi , Hamid Mohammadi Nasrabadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate estimation of grazing capacity is critical for sustainable rangeland management, yet remains challenging in semi-arid systems due to spatial heterogeneity and data uncertainty. This study applied an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) to predict grazing capacity in semi-steppe rangelands of northwest Iran and eastern Turkey. Four ecologically relevant inputs—slope, forage production, water supply distance, and soil resistance to erosion—were used as predictors. Forage production was derived from NDVI–biomass calibration (R2 = 0.72, RMSE = 58.3 kg/ha), and unsuitable areas (slope > 60 %, biomass < 50 kg/ha) were excluded. The ANFIS model was implemented in MATLAB using Gaussian membership functions (three per input), a cluster radius of 0.35, and 16 fuzzy rules. Model evaluation showed strong performance on training data (NRMSE = 4.7 %) but a substantially higher error on testing data (NRMSE = 19.2 %), indicating potential overfitting and spatial heterogeneity effects. Spatial outputs classified the study area into five grazing capacity categories, with higher capacities in western and southern zones and lower capacities in central regions. Comparison with vegetation-type classifications highlighted differences arising from ANFIS’s integration of multiple drivers beyond forage biomass. While results demonstrate the promise of neuro-fuzzy approaches for handling uncertain datasets and capturing spatial variability, we emphasize that outputs should be interpreted as indicative patterns rather than prescriptive management recommendations. Future work should integrate field validation, benchmark against simpler models, and incorporate dynamic factors such as drought and livestock species differences to enhance ecological realism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125002730\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125002730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing sustainability in semi-arid rangelands through grazing capacity simulation using fuzzy logic
Accurate estimation of grazing capacity is critical for sustainable rangeland management, yet remains challenging in semi-arid systems due to spatial heterogeneity and data uncertainty. This study applied an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) to predict grazing capacity in semi-steppe rangelands of northwest Iran and eastern Turkey. Four ecologically relevant inputs—slope, forage production, water supply distance, and soil resistance to erosion—were used as predictors. Forage production was derived from NDVI–biomass calibration (R2 = 0.72, RMSE = 58.3 kg/ha), and unsuitable areas (slope > 60 %, biomass < 50 kg/ha) were excluded. The ANFIS model was implemented in MATLAB using Gaussian membership functions (three per input), a cluster radius of 0.35, and 16 fuzzy rules. Model evaluation showed strong performance on training data (NRMSE = 4.7 %) but a substantially higher error on testing data (NRMSE = 19.2 %), indicating potential overfitting and spatial heterogeneity effects. Spatial outputs classified the study area into five grazing capacity categories, with higher capacities in western and southern zones and lower capacities in central regions. Comparison with vegetation-type classifications highlighted differences arising from ANFIS’s integration of multiple drivers beyond forage biomass. While results demonstrate the promise of neuro-fuzzy approaches for handling uncertain datasets and capturing spatial variability, we emphasize that outputs should be interpreted as indicative patterns rather than prescriptive management recommendations. Future work should integrate field validation, benchmark against simpler models, and incorporate dynamic factors such as drought and livestock species differences to enhance ecological realism.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.