骨科成像中的不确定性量化和可解释的人工智能:及时的行动呼吁

Q2 Medicine
Ahmad P. Tafti , Qiangqiang Gu , Johannes F. Plate
{"title":"骨科成像中的不确定性量化和可解释的人工智能:及时的行动呼吁","authors":"Ahmad P. Tafti ,&nbsp;Qiangqiang Gu ,&nbsp;Johannes F. Plate","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) has made a big leap in orthopaedic imaging, with deep learning models achieving remarkable accuracy in tasks such as knee osteoarthritis classification and grading, fracture detection, and implant assessment. Yet accuracy in AI models alone is insufficient for clinical trust, adoption, and uptake. Orthopaedic decision-making often carries high risk settings, where any misclassification or overconfidence can have significant consequences for treatment recommendations and patient outcomes. Despite this reality, most current AI models operate as “close boxes”, providing predictions without clarifying their reasoning or quantifying uncertainty. This forum article argues that the integration of uncertainty quantification and explainable AI is no longer optional, but a timely call to action for the orthopaedic community. Uncertainty quantification methods can highlight when predictions are unreliable, prompting confirmatory testing or human oversight, while explainable AI techniques provide transparency into model reasoning, enabling surgeons and radiologists to better interpret AI outputs. Together, these advances are essential components of trustworthy AI, bridging the gap between technical innovation and real-world orthopaedic practice. By embracing uncertainty-aware and explainable AI models, orthopaedic imaging can move beyond accuracy toward accountability, responsibility, and safer integration into clinical workflows. The time to act is now.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 103208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty quantification and explainable AI in orthopaedic imaging: A timely call to action\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad P. Tafti ,&nbsp;Qiangqiang Gu ,&nbsp;Johannes F. Plate\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) has made a big leap in orthopaedic imaging, with deep learning models achieving remarkable accuracy in tasks such as knee osteoarthritis classification and grading, fracture detection, and implant assessment. Yet accuracy in AI models alone is insufficient for clinical trust, adoption, and uptake. Orthopaedic decision-making often carries high risk settings, where any misclassification or overconfidence can have significant consequences for treatment recommendations and patient outcomes. Despite this reality, most current AI models operate as “close boxes”, providing predictions without clarifying their reasoning or quantifying uncertainty. This forum article argues that the integration of uncertainty quantification and explainable AI is no longer optional, but a timely call to action for the orthopaedic community. Uncertainty quantification methods can highlight when predictions are unreliable, prompting confirmatory testing or human oversight, while explainable AI techniques provide transparency into model reasoning, enabling surgeons and radiologists to better interpret AI outputs. Together, these advances are essential components of trustworthy AI, bridging the gap between technical innovation and real-world orthopaedic practice. By embracing uncertainty-aware and explainable AI models, orthopaedic imaging can move beyond accuracy toward accountability, responsibility, and safer integration into clinical workflows. The time to act is now.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225003066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225003066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在骨科成像领域取得了巨大飞跃,深度学习模型在膝关节骨关节炎分类和分级、骨折检测和植入物评估等任务中取得了惊人的准确性。然而,仅凭人工智能模型的准确性不足以获得临床信任、采用和吸收。骨科决策通常带有高风险设置,其中任何错误分类或过度自信都可能对治疗建议和患者结果产生重大影响。尽管存在这样的现实,但目前大多数人工智能模型都像“封闭的盒子”一样运行,提供预测,而不澄清其推理或量化不确定性。这篇论坛文章认为,不确定性量化和可解释人工智能的整合不再是可有可无的,而是对骨科界的及时行动呼吁。不确定性量化方法可以突出预测何时不可靠,从而提示验证测试或人为监督,而可解释的人工智能技术为模型推理提供了透明度,使外科医生和放射科医生能够更好地解释人工智能输出。总之,这些进步是值得信赖的人工智能的重要组成部分,弥合了技术创新与现实世界骨科实践之间的差距。通过采用不确定性感知和可解释的人工智能模型,骨科成像可以超越准确性,走向问责制、责任和更安全的临床工作流程整合。现在是行动的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncertainty quantification and explainable AI in orthopaedic imaging: A timely call to action
Artificial intelligence (AI) has made a big leap in orthopaedic imaging, with deep learning models achieving remarkable accuracy in tasks such as knee osteoarthritis classification and grading, fracture detection, and implant assessment. Yet accuracy in AI models alone is insufficient for clinical trust, adoption, and uptake. Orthopaedic decision-making often carries high risk settings, where any misclassification or overconfidence can have significant consequences for treatment recommendations and patient outcomes. Despite this reality, most current AI models operate as “close boxes”, providing predictions without clarifying their reasoning or quantifying uncertainty. This forum article argues that the integration of uncertainty quantification and explainable AI is no longer optional, but a timely call to action for the orthopaedic community. Uncertainty quantification methods can highlight when predictions are unreliable, prompting confirmatory testing or human oversight, while explainable AI techniques provide transparency into model reasoning, enabling surgeons and radiologists to better interpret AI outputs. Together, these advances are essential components of trustworthy AI, bridging the gap between technical innovation and real-world orthopaedic practice. By embracing uncertainty-aware and explainable AI models, orthopaedic imaging can move beyond accuracy toward accountability, responsibility, and safer integration into clinical workflows. The time to act is now.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信