设计和验证一个人工智能支持的工具,以加强英语教育中的批判性探究

Wan Yee Winsy Lai , Paul Kim , Ju Seong Lee
{"title":"设计和验证一个人工智能支持的工具,以加强英语教育中的批判性探究","authors":"Wan Yee Winsy Lai ,&nbsp;Paul Kim ,&nbsp;Ju Seong Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As Generative AI (GenAI) technologies advance rapidly, educational settings face an urgent need for targeted interventions to cultivate learners’ critical, higher-order inquiry skills, so they can effectively navigate, assess, and apply AI-generated content. The urgency of this imperative is magnified for EFL learners in test-driven educational contexts that foster passive learning behaviors, discourage questioning, and inhibit critical thinking. To address these issues, we developed an AI-powered tool designed to evaluate questions based on Bloom’s Taxonomy, a six-level framework of cognitive processes, ranging from basic recall questions (Level 1) to advanced questions that trigger creative and evaluative thinking (Level 5). In study 1, the reliability of the tool was confirmed through multiple inter-rater tests with strong agreement. In study 2, we implemented an intervention program that integrated Bloom’s Taxonomy, targeted readings, group discussions, and sharing to enhance inquiry skills among EFL undergraduate students. Four statistical analyses in SPSS 29.0—including ICC for inter-rater reliability, Pearson correlation, and regression—were conducted to validate the AI-powered inquiry evaluation tool. Across 174 questions, students’ average inquiry level improved from 3.3 to 4.1 (on a five-level scale), showing a significant 0.8-level increase and meaningful enhancement in question quality. The study provides solid evidence of the reliability and validity of the AI-powered inquiry evaluation tool as an objective, real-time method that enhances the efficiency, consistency, and scalability of assessments, offering valuable guidance for EFL practitioners, curriculum designers, researchers, educators, and institutions in integrating evidence-based, inquiry-driven tools into EFL programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and validating an AI-supported tool for enhancing critical inquiry in EFL education\",\"authors\":\"Wan Yee Winsy Lai ,&nbsp;Paul Kim ,&nbsp;Ju Seong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As Generative AI (GenAI) technologies advance rapidly, educational settings face an urgent need for targeted interventions to cultivate learners’ critical, higher-order inquiry skills, so they can effectively navigate, assess, and apply AI-generated content. The urgency of this imperative is magnified for EFL learners in test-driven educational contexts that foster passive learning behaviors, discourage questioning, and inhibit critical thinking. To address these issues, we developed an AI-powered tool designed to evaluate questions based on Bloom’s Taxonomy, a six-level framework of cognitive processes, ranging from basic recall questions (Level 1) to advanced questions that trigger creative and evaluative thinking (Level 5). In study 1, the reliability of the tool was confirmed through multiple inter-rater tests with strong agreement. In study 2, we implemented an intervention program that integrated Bloom’s Taxonomy, targeted readings, group discussions, and sharing to enhance inquiry skills among EFL undergraduate students. Four statistical analyses in SPSS 29.0—including ICC for inter-rater reliability, Pearson correlation, and regression—were conducted to validate the AI-powered inquiry evaluation tool. Across 174 questions, students’ average inquiry level improved from 3.3 to 4.1 (on a five-level scale), showing a significant 0.8-level increase and meaningful enhancement in question quality. The study provides solid evidence of the reliability and validity of the AI-powered inquiry evaluation tool as an objective, real-time method that enhances the efficiency, consistency, and scalability of assessments, offering valuable guidance for EFL practitioners, curriculum designers, researchers, educators, and institutions in integrating evidence-based, inquiry-driven tools into EFL programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着生成式人工智能(GenAI)技术的快速发展,教育环境迫切需要有针对性的干预措施,以培养学习者的关键、高阶探究技能,使他们能够有效地导航、评估和应用人工智能生成的内容。在应试教育环境中,这种迫切性对英语学习者来说被放大了,这种环境助长了被动学习行为,阻碍了提问,抑制了批判性思维。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一个人工智能驱动的工具,旨在根据布鲁姆分类法(Bloom’s Taxonomy)评估问题,布鲁姆分类法是一个六级认知过程框架,从基本的回忆问题(1级)到触发创造性和评估性思维的高级问题(5级)。在研究1中,该工具的可靠性通过多个评估者之间的检验得到了证实,并具有很强的一致性。在研究2中,我们实施了一项干预计划,将布鲁姆分类法、有针对性的阅读、小组讨论和分享结合起来,以提高英语本科生的探究技能。在SPSS 29.0中进行了四项统计分析,包括评估者间信度的ICC, Pearson相关性和回归,以验证人工智能驱动的查询评估工具。在174个问题中,学生的平均探究水平从3.3提高到4.1(5个等级),显著提高了0.8个等级,问题质量有意义的提高。该研究提供了确凿的证据,证明了人工智能驱动的探究性评估工具作为一种客观、实时的方法的可靠性和有效性,它提高了评估的效率、一致性和可扩展性,为EFL从业者、课程设计师、研究人员、教育工作者和机构在将基于证据的、探究性驱动的工具整合到EFL课程中提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing and validating an AI-supported tool for enhancing critical inquiry in EFL education
As Generative AI (GenAI) technologies advance rapidly, educational settings face an urgent need for targeted interventions to cultivate learners’ critical, higher-order inquiry skills, so they can effectively navigate, assess, and apply AI-generated content. The urgency of this imperative is magnified for EFL learners in test-driven educational contexts that foster passive learning behaviors, discourage questioning, and inhibit critical thinking. To address these issues, we developed an AI-powered tool designed to evaluate questions based on Bloom’s Taxonomy, a six-level framework of cognitive processes, ranging from basic recall questions (Level 1) to advanced questions that trigger creative and evaluative thinking (Level 5). In study 1, the reliability of the tool was confirmed through multiple inter-rater tests with strong agreement. In study 2, we implemented an intervention program that integrated Bloom’s Taxonomy, targeted readings, group discussions, and sharing to enhance inquiry skills among EFL undergraduate students. Four statistical analyses in SPSS 29.0—including ICC for inter-rater reliability, Pearson correlation, and regression—were conducted to validate the AI-powered inquiry evaluation tool. Across 174 questions, students’ average inquiry level improved from 3.3 to 4.1 (on a five-level scale), showing a significant 0.8-level increase and meaningful enhancement in question quality. The study provides solid evidence of the reliability and validity of the AI-powered inquiry evaluation tool as an objective, real-time method that enhances the efficiency, consistency, and scalability of assessments, offering valuable guidance for EFL practitioners, curriculum designers, researchers, educators, and institutions in integrating evidence-based, inquiry-driven tools into EFL programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信