{"title":"功能运动测试在预测跑步时Trendelenburg步态模式中的有效性:一项横断面研究","authors":"Farideh Babakhani, Mohamadreza Hatefi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.09.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Dropping the pelvic of the swinging leg or Trendelenburg sign during running is known as a biomechanical risk factor for lower extremity non-contact injuries. Numerous performance tests have been introduced to identify individuals who exhibit the Trendelenburg sign, including the single-leg squat (SLSQ), pelvic drop (PD), and single-leg stand (SLS) However, it is still unclear whether these tests are relevant for predicting the Trendelenburg sign during running.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>twelve males with Trendelenburg sign during running (age, 26.49 ± 4.46 years, weight, 78.15 ± 8.66 kg, height, 178.09 ± 6.76 cm) voluntarily participated in this research. The correlation between dropped pelvic and frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) during running was investigated with SLSQ, PD, and SLS functional tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a significant relationship between dropped pelvic during running and the SLSQ test (p = 0.043, r = 0.570 [-0.91 to 0.840]). However, there was no statistical significance between SLS and PD tests and the Trendelenburg sign during running (p ≥ 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings suggest that the SLSQ test can be used as a simple and practical screening tool to identify individuals at risk of Trendelenburg gait during running, which may assist in injury prevention programs. Notably, the authors argue that the lack of correlation between other tasks is due to differences in the physical demands of the movements, which should be taken into account when selecting the appropriate test to assess movement performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 606-610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of functional movement tests in predicting the Trendelenburg gait pattern during running: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Farideh Babakhani, Mohamadreza Hatefi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.09.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Dropping the pelvic of the swinging leg or Trendelenburg sign during running is known as a biomechanical risk factor for lower extremity non-contact injuries. Numerous performance tests have been introduced to identify individuals who exhibit the Trendelenburg sign, including the single-leg squat (SLSQ), pelvic drop (PD), and single-leg stand (SLS) However, it is still unclear whether these tests are relevant for predicting the Trendelenburg sign during running.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>twelve males with Trendelenburg sign during running (age, 26.49 ± 4.46 years, weight, 78.15 ± 8.66 kg, height, 178.09 ± 6.76 cm) voluntarily participated in this research. The correlation between dropped pelvic and frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) during running was investigated with SLSQ, PD, and SLS functional tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a significant relationship between dropped pelvic during running and the SLSQ test (p = 0.043, r = 0.570 [-0.91 to 0.840]). However, there was no statistical significance between SLS and PD tests and the Trendelenburg sign during running (p ≥ 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings suggest that the SLSQ test can be used as a simple and practical screening tool to identify individuals at risk of Trendelenburg gait during running, which may assist in injury prevention programs. Notably, the authors argue that the lack of correlation between other tasks is due to differences in the physical demands of the movements, which should be taken into account when selecting the appropriate test to assess movement performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 606-610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在跑步过程中,摆动腿或Trendelenburg体征的骨盆下垂被认为是下肢非接触性损伤的生物力学风险因素。已经引入了许多性能测试来识别表现出Trendelenburg症状的个体,包括单腿深蹲(SLSQ)、骨盆下降(PD)和单腿站立(SLS)。然而,这些测试是否与预测跑步时的Trendelenburg症状有关尚不清楚。方法12例跑步过程中出现Trendelenburg征的男性(年龄26.49±4.46岁,体重78.15±8.66 kg,身高178.09±6.76 cm)自愿参加本研究。采用SLSQ、PD和SLS功能测试,研究跑步时骨盆下垂与正面平面投影角(FPPA)的相关性。结果跑步时盆腔下垂与SLSQ测试有显著相关性(p = 0.043, r = 0.570[-0.91 ~ 0.840])。但SLS、PD检验与跑步时Trendelenburg体征差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05)。结论SLSQ测试可作为一种简单实用的筛查工具,用于识别跑步过程中有Trendelenburg步态风险的个体,有助于制定损伤预防计划。值得注意的是,作者认为其他任务之间缺乏相关性是由于运动的物理需求的差异,在选择适当的测试来评估运动表现时应考虑到这一点。
Validity of functional movement tests in predicting the Trendelenburg gait pattern during running: A cross-sectional study
Introduction
Dropping the pelvic of the swinging leg or Trendelenburg sign during running is known as a biomechanical risk factor for lower extremity non-contact injuries. Numerous performance tests have been introduced to identify individuals who exhibit the Trendelenburg sign, including the single-leg squat (SLSQ), pelvic drop (PD), and single-leg stand (SLS) However, it is still unclear whether these tests are relevant for predicting the Trendelenburg sign during running.
Method
twelve males with Trendelenburg sign during running (age, 26.49 ± 4.46 years, weight, 78.15 ± 8.66 kg, height, 178.09 ± 6.76 cm) voluntarily participated in this research. The correlation between dropped pelvic and frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) during running was investigated with SLSQ, PD, and SLS functional tests.
Results
There was a significant relationship between dropped pelvic during running and the SLSQ test (p = 0.043, r = 0.570 [-0.91 to 0.840]). However, there was no statistical significance between SLS and PD tests and the Trendelenburg sign during running (p ≥ 0.05).
Conclusion
The findings suggest that the SLSQ test can be used as a simple and practical screening tool to identify individuals at risk of Trendelenburg gait during running, which may assist in injury prevention programs. Notably, the authors argue that the lack of correlation between other tasks is due to differences in the physical demands of the movements, which should be taken into account when selecting the appropriate test to assess movement performance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina