COVID-19后三年的功能和认知结果

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Melanie Li , Thomas Wisniewski , Floyd Silva , Salma Hammam , Zariya Alvarez , Nadir Bilici , Leomaris Caba Caceres , Natasha De La Cruz , Celia Engelson , Julia Greenberg , Bavica Gummadi , Jessica Hunter , Daniella Iglesias Hernandez , Sohail Karimi , Jon Links , Miguel Rodriguez , Alok Vedvyas , Hanna Vinitsky , Amin Yakubov , Yulin Ge , Jennifer A. Frontera
{"title":"COVID-19后三年的功能和认知结果","authors":"Melanie Li ,&nbsp;Thomas Wisniewski ,&nbsp;Floyd Silva ,&nbsp;Salma Hammam ,&nbsp;Zariya Alvarez ,&nbsp;Nadir Bilici ,&nbsp;Leomaris Caba Caceres ,&nbsp;Natasha De La Cruz ,&nbsp;Celia Engelson ,&nbsp;Julia Greenberg ,&nbsp;Bavica Gummadi ,&nbsp;Jessica Hunter ,&nbsp;Daniella Iglesias Hernandez ,&nbsp;Sohail Karimi ,&nbsp;Jon Links ,&nbsp;Miguel Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Alok Vedvyas ,&nbsp;Hanna Vinitsky ,&nbsp;Amin Yakubov ,&nbsp;Yulin Ge ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Frontera","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is paucity of data on long-term functional and cognitive outcomes after COVID-19 compared to COVID-negative controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an observational cohort study of patients ≥ 1 year after COVID-19 compared to contemporaneous COVID-19 negative controls (SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG negative with no history of COVID-19). Functional (modified Rankin Scale [mRS], Barthel Index), cognitive (telephone MoCA [t-MoCA]), and patient-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms were compared between groups using multivariable logistic regression analysis. In a subgroup of COVID-19 patients who were followed longitudinally, trajectories of recovery were assessed using the paired samples Sign test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 145 participants, N = 115 COVID-19 patients (median age 62, 51 % female, 33 % hospitalized for COVID-19, median 2.9 years from index infection), and N = 30 non-COVID-19 controls (median age 75, 70 % female) were enrolled. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported in 76 % of COVID-19 patients versus 7 % of controls (aOR 15.0, 95 %CI 3.09–72.47, P &lt; 0.001). Abnormal mRS&gt; 0 occurred in 42 % of COVID-19 patients compared to 11 % of controls (P = 0.002). However, this difference was not significant after adjusting for age, sex, COVID-19 hospitalization and history of mood disorder (aOR 2.10, 95 %CI 0.52–8.51). Rates of abnormal t-MoCA≤ 18 (40 % of COVID-19 versus 41 % of controls, P = 1.00) and Barthel scores&lt; 100 (19 % of COVID-19 versus 14 % in controls, P = 0.785) were similar. Among N = 26 COVID-19 patients with repeated measures, mRS significantly improved between 6-months to 3-years post-COVID (+1.3 points, p = 0.004), while no changes were observed in t-MoCA or Barthel.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Three years after COVID-19, neuropsychiatric symptoms were significantly more frequent compared to controls, however no differences in functional or cognitive status were detected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 109180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional and cognitive outcomes three years after COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Li ,&nbsp;Thomas Wisniewski ,&nbsp;Floyd Silva ,&nbsp;Salma Hammam ,&nbsp;Zariya Alvarez ,&nbsp;Nadir Bilici ,&nbsp;Leomaris Caba Caceres ,&nbsp;Natasha De La Cruz ,&nbsp;Celia Engelson ,&nbsp;Julia Greenberg ,&nbsp;Bavica Gummadi ,&nbsp;Jessica Hunter ,&nbsp;Daniella Iglesias Hernandez ,&nbsp;Sohail Karimi ,&nbsp;Jon Links ,&nbsp;Miguel Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Alok Vedvyas ,&nbsp;Hanna Vinitsky ,&nbsp;Amin Yakubov ,&nbsp;Yulin Ge ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Frontera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is paucity of data on long-term functional and cognitive outcomes after COVID-19 compared to COVID-negative controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an observational cohort study of patients ≥ 1 year after COVID-19 compared to contemporaneous COVID-19 negative controls (SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG negative with no history of COVID-19). Functional (modified Rankin Scale [mRS], Barthel Index), cognitive (telephone MoCA [t-MoCA]), and patient-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms were compared between groups using multivariable logistic regression analysis. In a subgroup of COVID-19 patients who were followed longitudinally, trajectories of recovery were assessed using the paired samples Sign test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 145 participants, N = 115 COVID-19 patients (median age 62, 51 % female, 33 % hospitalized for COVID-19, median 2.9 years from index infection), and N = 30 non-COVID-19 controls (median age 75, 70 % female) were enrolled. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported in 76 % of COVID-19 patients versus 7 % of controls (aOR 15.0, 95 %CI 3.09–72.47, P &lt; 0.001). Abnormal mRS&gt; 0 occurred in 42 % of COVID-19 patients compared to 11 % of controls (P = 0.002). However, this difference was not significant after adjusting for age, sex, COVID-19 hospitalization and history of mood disorder (aOR 2.10, 95 %CI 0.52–8.51). Rates of abnormal t-MoCA≤ 18 (40 % of COVID-19 versus 41 % of controls, P = 1.00) and Barthel scores&lt; 100 (19 % of COVID-19 versus 14 % in controls, P = 0.785) were similar. Among N = 26 COVID-19 patients with repeated measures, mRS significantly improved between 6-months to 3-years post-COVID (+1.3 points, p = 0.004), while no changes were observed in t-MoCA or Barthel.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Three years after COVID-19, neuropsychiatric symptoms were significantly more frequent compared to controls, however no differences in functional or cognitive status were detected.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725004639\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725004639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与COVID-19阴性对照相比,缺乏COVID-19后长期功能和认知结果的数据。方法对感染COVID-19≥ 1年的患者与同期COVID-19阴性对照(SARS-CoV-2核衣壳IgG阴性,无COVID-19病史)进行观察性队列研究。功能量表(改良Rankin量表[mRS]、Barthel指数)、认知量表(电话MoCA量表[t-MoCA])和患者报告的神经精神症状采用多变量logistic回归分析。在纵向随访的COVID-19患者亚组中,使用配对样本Sign检验评估恢复轨迹。结果在145名参与者中,N = 纳入115名COVID-19患者(中位年龄62岁,女性占51% %,33 %因COVID-19住院,离指数感染的中位时间为2.9年),N = 纳入30名非COVID-19对照组(中位年龄75岁,女性占70% %)。76 %的COVID-19患者报告了神经精神症状,对照组为7 % (aOR 15.0, 95 %CI 3.09-72.47, P <; 0.001)。42 %的COVID-19患者出现mRS>; 0异常,而对照组为11 % (P = 0.002)。然而,在调整了年龄、性别、COVID-19住院和情绪障碍史后,这种差异不显著(aOR 2.10, 95 %CI 0.52-8.51)。t-MoCA异常率≤ 18(40 % COVID-19和41 %的控制、P = 1.00)和Barthel scores< 100(19 % COVID-19和14 %控制、P = 0.785)是相同的。在N = 26例重复测量的COVID-19患者中,mRS在covid后6个月至3年内显著改善(+1.3点,p = 0.004),而t-MoCA或Barthel未见变化。结论新冠肺炎后3年,神经精神症状明显高于对照组,但功能或认知状态未见差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional and cognitive outcomes three years after COVID-19

Background

There is paucity of data on long-term functional and cognitive outcomes after COVID-19 compared to COVID-negative controls.

Methods

We conducted an observational cohort study of patients ≥ 1 year after COVID-19 compared to contemporaneous COVID-19 negative controls (SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG negative with no history of COVID-19). Functional (modified Rankin Scale [mRS], Barthel Index), cognitive (telephone MoCA [t-MoCA]), and patient-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms were compared between groups using multivariable logistic regression analysis. In a subgroup of COVID-19 patients who were followed longitudinally, trajectories of recovery were assessed using the paired samples Sign test.

Results

Of 145 participants, N = 115 COVID-19 patients (median age 62, 51 % female, 33 % hospitalized for COVID-19, median 2.9 years from index infection), and N = 30 non-COVID-19 controls (median age 75, 70 % female) were enrolled. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported in 76 % of COVID-19 patients versus 7 % of controls (aOR 15.0, 95 %CI 3.09–72.47, P < 0.001). Abnormal mRS> 0 occurred in 42 % of COVID-19 patients compared to 11 % of controls (P = 0.002). However, this difference was not significant after adjusting for age, sex, COVID-19 hospitalization and history of mood disorder (aOR 2.10, 95 %CI 0.52–8.51). Rates of abnormal t-MoCA≤ 18 (40 % of COVID-19 versus 41 % of controls, P = 1.00) and Barthel scores< 100 (19 % of COVID-19 versus 14 % in controls, P = 0.785) were similar. Among N = 26 COVID-19 patients with repeated measures, mRS significantly improved between 6-months to 3-years post-COVID (+1.3 points, p = 0.004), while no changes were observed in t-MoCA or Barthel.

Conclusions

Three years after COVID-19, neuropsychiatric symptoms were significantly more frequent compared to controls, however no differences in functional or cognitive status were detected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信