ESG评级差异和机构投资者持股比例差异对企业可持续发展的影响

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Tian Shang , Gongyu Song , Yijia Yu , Yi Wei
{"title":"ESG评级差异和机构投资者持股比例差异对企业可持续发展的影响","authors":"Tian Shang ,&nbsp;Gongyu Song ,&nbsp;Yijia Yu ,&nbsp;Yi Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.108538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper conducts an empirical analysis based on data from non-financial listed companies in China from 2010 to 2023, exploring in depth the impact mechanism of ESG rating discrepancies and institutional investors' shareholding on corporate sustainable development. The research findings indicate that ESG rating discrepancies significantly hinder corporate sustainable development, while institutional investors' shareholding demonstrates a notable positive effect on sustainable development. Further analysis reveals that institutional investors' shareholding plays an important moderating role between ESG rating discrepancies and corporate sustainable development, with a significant difference in this moderating effect between high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises. Additionally, the degree of impact of ESG rating discrepancies on corporate sustainable development shows significant differences between high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 108538"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of discrepancies in ESG ratings and institutional investors' shareholding on corporate sustainability development\",\"authors\":\"Tian Shang ,&nbsp;Gongyu Song ,&nbsp;Yijia Yu ,&nbsp;Yi Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.108538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper conducts an empirical analysis based on data from non-financial listed companies in China from 2010 to 2023, exploring in depth the impact mechanism of ESG rating discrepancies and institutional investors' shareholding on corporate sustainable development. The research findings indicate that ESG rating discrepancies significantly hinder corporate sustainable development, while institutional investors' shareholding demonstrates a notable positive effect on sustainable development. Further analysis reveals that institutional investors' shareholding plays an important moderating role between ESG rating discrepancies and corporate sustainable development, with a significant difference in this moderating effect between high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises. Additionally, the degree of impact of ESG rating discrepancies on corporate sustainable development shows significant differences between high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325017921\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325017921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于2010 - 2023年中国非金融类上市公司数据进行实证分析,深入探讨ESG评级差异和机构投资者持股对企业可持续发展的影响机制。研究发现,ESG评级差异显著阻碍企业可持续发展,而机构投资者持股对企业可持续发展具有显著的正向影响。进一步分析发现,机构投资者持股在ESG评级差异与企业可持续发展之间起着重要的调节作用,且这种调节作用在高新技术企业与非高新技术企业之间存在显著差异。此外,ESG评级差异对企业可持续发展的影响程度在高新技术企业和非高新技术企业之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of discrepancies in ESG ratings and institutional investors' shareholding on corporate sustainability development
This paper conducts an empirical analysis based on data from non-financial listed companies in China from 2010 to 2023, exploring in depth the impact mechanism of ESG rating discrepancies and institutional investors' shareholding on corporate sustainable development. The research findings indicate that ESG rating discrepancies significantly hinder corporate sustainable development, while institutional investors' shareholding demonstrates a notable positive effect on sustainable development. Further analysis reveals that institutional investors' shareholding plays an important moderating role between ESG rating discrepancies and corporate sustainable development, with a significant difference in this moderating effect between high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises. Additionally, the degree of impact of ESG rating discrepancies on corporate sustainable development shows significant differences between high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信