Karina Cruz-Vázquez, Emiliano Morones-García, Juan-Luis François
{"title":"米兹顿多用途核微反应堆的中子评估:设计方案和性能","authors":"Karina Cruz-Vázquez, Emiliano Morones-García, Juan-Luis François","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mizton is a multipurpose nuclear microreactor developed by a research group of the School of Engineering of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, currently in the conceptual design stage. The reference microreactor design has a thermal power of 15 MW, using heat pipes with sodium as a coolant, 19.75 % <sup>235</sup>U enriched uranium nitride (UN) TRISO particles as fuel, a monolith of SiC and a secondary reflector of Zr<sub>3</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>. This research proposes an alternative design with a monolith of graphite, a secondary reflector of ZrC, and a fuel of uranium–plutonium nitride; four models were analyzed in total. The Monte Carlo code Serpent, version 2.1.32 and the JEFF-3.1 cross-section library were used for neutronic simulations. For each of the models, the behavior of the effective neutron multiplication factor and the effect on the reactivity of the variation of the density of the monolith were analyzed. Furthermore, the primary safety parameters such as the Doppler coefficient, the control rods’ worth, the delayed neutron fraction and the neutron generation time were also calculated. In addition, the fuel evolution over a given period at full power was analyzed for each of the models studied. According to the results, the alternative design achieved higher effective neutron multiplication factor values than the reference design. For all the models, the control rods inserted enough reactivity for the safe shutdown, the Doppler coefficient was negative, and the effect on the reactivity of the variation of the monolith density was negligible. The alternative design with enriched UN fuel achieved a longer operating cycle of approximately 9.9 years and reached a burnup of 19,224 MWd/tU.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 111903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutronic assessment of the Mizton multipurpose nuclear microreactor: Design alternatives and performance\",\"authors\":\"Karina Cruz-Vázquez, Emiliano Morones-García, Juan-Luis François\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mizton is a multipurpose nuclear microreactor developed by a research group of the School of Engineering of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, currently in the conceptual design stage. The reference microreactor design has a thermal power of 15 MW, using heat pipes with sodium as a coolant, 19.75 % <sup>235</sup>U enriched uranium nitride (UN) TRISO particles as fuel, a monolith of SiC and a secondary reflector of Zr<sub>3</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>. This research proposes an alternative design with a monolith of graphite, a secondary reflector of ZrC, and a fuel of uranium–plutonium nitride; four models were analyzed in total. The Monte Carlo code Serpent, version 2.1.32 and the JEFF-3.1 cross-section library were used for neutronic simulations. For each of the models, the behavior of the effective neutron multiplication factor and the effect on the reactivity of the variation of the density of the monolith were analyzed. Furthermore, the primary safety parameters such as the Doppler coefficient, the control rods’ worth, the delayed neutron fraction and the neutron generation time were also calculated. In addition, the fuel evolution over a given period at full power was analyzed for each of the models studied. According to the results, the alternative design achieved higher effective neutron multiplication factor values than the reference design. For all the models, the control rods inserted enough reactivity for the safe shutdown, the Doppler coefficient was negative, and the effect on the reactivity of the variation of the monolith density was negligible. The alternative design with enriched UN fuel achieved a longer operating cycle of approximately 9.9 years and reached a burnup of 19,224 MWd/tU.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925007200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925007200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neutronic assessment of the Mizton multipurpose nuclear microreactor: Design alternatives and performance
Mizton is a multipurpose nuclear microreactor developed by a research group of the School of Engineering of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, currently in the conceptual design stage. The reference microreactor design has a thermal power of 15 MW, using heat pipes with sodium as a coolant, 19.75 % 235U enriched uranium nitride (UN) TRISO particles as fuel, a monolith of SiC and a secondary reflector of Zr3Si2. This research proposes an alternative design with a monolith of graphite, a secondary reflector of ZrC, and a fuel of uranium–plutonium nitride; four models were analyzed in total. The Monte Carlo code Serpent, version 2.1.32 and the JEFF-3.1 cross-section library were used for neutronic simulations. For each of the models, the behavior of the effective neutron multiplication factor and the effect on the reactivity of the variation of the density of the monolith were analyzed. Furthermore, the primary safety parameters such as the Doppler coefficient, the control rods’ worth, the delayed neutron fraction and the neutron generation time were also calculated. In addition, the fuel evolution over a given period at full power was analyzed for each of the models studied. According to the results, the alternative design achieved higher effective neutron multiplication factor values than the reference design. For all the models, the control rods inserted enough reactivity for the safe shutdown, the Doppler coefficient was negative, and the effect on the reactivity of the variation of the monolith density was negligible. The alternative design with enriched UN fuel achieved a longer operating cycle of approximately 9.9 years and reached a burnup of 19,224 MWd/tU.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.