探索病人选择标准与家庭医院护理的相关性:专家调查的结果。

Kerstin Denecke, Octavio Rivera-Romero
{"title":"探索病人选择标准与家庭医院护理的相关性:专家调查的结果。","authors":"Kerstin Denecke, Octavio Rivera-Romero","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospital at home (HaH) models involve treating patients at home for conditions that typically require hospitalisation. This paper reports on an expert survey to validate patient selection criteria from the literature. Feedback from 20 experts led to consensus on four criteria: medical condition, clinical suitability, living conditions and social support. No consensus was reached on the criteria demographics, technological readiness and literacy. Five other characteristics were identified. These criteria emphasise the importance of selecting patients on the basis of clinical need, safety, and ability to receive care at home, while taking into account potential inequalities. Future efforts should focus on improving digital readiness, integrating multidisciplinary perspectives, and ensuring equitable access to HaH services.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Relevance of Patient Selection Criteria for Hospital at Home Care: Results from an Expert Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Kerstin Denecke, Octavio Rivera-Romero\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI251502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hospital at home (HaH) models involve treating patients at home for conditions that typically require hospitalisation. This paper reports on an expert survey to validate patient selection criteria from the literature. Feedback from 20 experts led to consensus on four criteria: medical condition, clinical suitability, living conditions and social support. No consensus was reached on the criteria demographics, technological readiness and literacy. Five other characteristics were identified. These criteria emphasise the importance of selecting patients on the basis of clinical need, safety, and ability to receive care at home, while taking into account potential inequalities. Future efforts should focus on improving digital readiness, integrating multidisciplinary perspectives, and ensuring equitable access to HaH services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"volume\":\"332 \",\"pages\":\"88-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭医院(HaH)模式涉及在家中治疗患者通常需要住院治疗的病症。本文报告了一项专家调查,以验证从文献中选择患者的标准。来自20位专家的反馈意见导致就四项标准达成共识:医疗状况、临床适宜性、生活条件和社会支持。没有就人口统计、技术准备和识字的标准达成协商一致意见。另外还确定了五个特征。这些标准强调了根据临床需要、安全性和在家接受护理的能力来选择患者的重要性,同时考虑到潜在的不平等。未来的工作应侧重于提高数字化准备程度,整合多学科观点,并确保公平获得卫生保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Relevance of Patient Selection Criteria for Hospital at Home Care: Results from an Expert Survey.

Hospital at home (HaH) models involve treating patients at home for conditions that typically require hospitalisation. This paper reports on an expert survey to validate patient selection criteria from the literature. Feedback from 20 experts led to consensus on four criteria: medical condition, clinical suitability, living conditions and social support. No consensus was reached on the criteria demographics, technological readiness and literacy. Five other characteristics were identified. These criteria emphasise the importance of selecting patients on the basis of clinical need, safety, and ability to receive care at home, while taking into account potential inequalities. Future efforts should focus on improving digital readiness, integrating multidisciplinary perspectives, and ensuring equitable access to HaH services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信