SNOMED CT失败的原因。健康信息学的医学视角。

Petter Hurlen
{"title":"SNOMED CT失败的原因。健康信息学的医学视角。","authors":"Petter Hurlen","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper addresses the lack of evidence-based Health informatics, using SNOMED CT as an example. After 60 years, there is still no evidence that SNOMED CT provides benefits to individual patients and no evidence that it can replace the medical languag safely. The terminology assumes that medical concepts are universal, stable and autonomous. This does not apply to the clinical understanding of diseases and diagnoses as found in evidence-based medicine, possibly explaining the lack of success. SNOMED CT should be used with caution and not replace professional languages in clinical work without evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"315-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why SNOMED CT Fails to Succeed. A Medical Perspective on Health Informatics.\",\"authors\":\"Petter Hurlen\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI251553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper addresses the lack of evidence-based Health informatics, using SNOMED CT as an example. After 60 years, there is still no evidence that SNOMED CT provides benefits to individual patients and no evidence that it can replace the medical languag safely. The terminology assumes that medical concepts are universal, stable and autonomous. This does not apply to the clinical understanding of diseases and diagnoses as found in evidence-based medicine, possibly explaining the lack of success. SNOMED CT should be used with caution and not replace professional languages in clinical work without evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"volume\":\"332 \",\"pages\":\"315-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以SNOMED CT为例,解决了缺乏循证卫生信息学的问题。60年后,仍然没有证据表明SNOMED CT对个别患者有益,也没有证据表明它可以安全地取代医学语言。该术语假定医学概念是普遍的、稳定的和自主的。这并不适用于循证医学中对疾病和诊断的临床理解,这可能解释了缺乏成功的原因。在临床工作中慎用SNOMED CT,无证据不能替代专业语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why SNOMED CT Fails to Succeed. A Medical Perspective on Health Informatics.

This paper addresses the lack of evidence-based Health informatics, using SNOMED CT as an example. After 60 years, there is still no evidence that SNOMED CT provides benefits to individual patients and no evidence that it can replace the medical languag safely. The terminology assumes that medical concepts are universal, stable and autonomous. This does not apply to the clinical understanding of diseases and diagnoses as found in evidence-based medicine, possibly explaining the lack of success. SNOMED CT should be used with caution and not replace professional languages in clinical work without evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信